Sentences with phrase «particular judicial ruling»

The most unexpected aspect of this rather unique level of media attention is that it does not directly concern any particular judicial ruling by a Court, which, since it decided its first case in 1954, has issued more than 28,000 judgments and orders.

Though the elected representatives of the people may complain about particular judicial rulings and try to influence those rulings through judicial appointments and party platforms, none challenge the authority of the ruling principle itself.

Not exact matches

Judicial majorities do tend toward more narrow rulings, except of course when they have something more significant to say beyond the particular legal questions set before them.

The particular issue is when an agency action is a rule - making decision, so stays within the agency, or an individual judicial action and so can be brought to the courts.

The number of law school courses offered in judicial opinion writing has increased, 1 along with the total number of elective courses in legal writing.2 The growth of judicial opinion writing courses, in particular, may be due to the rise in popularity of judicial externships.3 Several schools have added a classroom component to externships in response to rules of the American Association of Law Schools (AALS) 4 and the American Bar Association (ABA).5

Finally, employers operating in multiple jurisdictions will be best served by drafting their employment agreements to reflect not only differences in applicable employment standards, but also judicial rulings in the particular province.

Indeed, the Northern District of California recently issued a rule mandating the disclosure of TPLF in all class and representative actions, providing an important precedent for making the practice more transparent in that particular judicial district.

Citing the Canadian Judicial Council's «Statement of Principles on Self - Represented Litigants and Accused Persons», the Court went on to make a ruling that included an explanation of law and in particular procedure and limitations.

This takes us to the essence of Justice Stratas» reasoning here which is that in legal proceedings (judicial reviews in particular) under our Westminister system of government, an attorney general enjoys a presumptive right to intervene on the basis that public rights are vested in the Crown and an attorney general enforces those rights and represents the public interest: «Giving Attorneys General a broader right to apply to intervene in order to advance the public interest — as Rule 110 (c) does — is consistent with these foundational principles and constitutional arrangements.

[2] The determination of which category and, accordingly, which specific Rules apply to an individual judicial officer, depends upon the facts of the particular judicial service.

Nothing Dunsmuir says about the rule of law suggests that constitutional compliance dictates how many standards of review are required; the only requirement is that «there be judicial review in order to ensure, in particular, that decision - makers do not exercise authority they do not have» (emphasis in original).

(5) The judge, while a judge or a judicial candidate, has made a public statement, other than in a court proceeding, judicial decision, or opinion, that commits or appears to commit the judge to reach a particular result or rule in a particular way in the proceeding or controversy.

Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion stated the rule was not «narrowly tailored» to preserve judicial impartiality because it focused on issues instead of on particular litigants.

(b) to improve the knowledge of the European Union's primary and secondary law among judges, prosecutors and judicial staff, including fostering the knowledge of the procedures before the European Court of Justice, in particular the procedure for obtaining a preliminary ruling on the validity and / or interpretation of provisions of European law;

Part IV takes up the judicial regulation of the business of law and canvasses measures taken in relation to (1) entry restrictions, (2) post-entry limits on competition (in particular, in the areas of advertising, fees, and unauthorized practice of law) and, (3) post-entry conduct rules (specifically relating to conflicts of interest and lawyer withdrawals from the record).

The Rules contemplate active judicial management of litigation and, in particular, judicial regulation of the role of expert witnesses at trial.

For this purpose, the child shall in particular be provided the opportunity to be heard in any judicial and administrative proceedings affecting the child, either directly, or through a representative or an appropriate body, in a manner consistent with the procedural rules of national law.