Sentences with phrase «particular men who»

If you set your standards too high when judging whether specific men are suitable as «boyfriend material» or not then you may well be excluding particular men who in practice would make a very good boyfriend for you.

But the possibility of such sonship to God of course exists for all men, and one can not point to particular men who have the special quality of being sons of God.

Holy matrimony deals first with God and God's church, but it deals also with a particular woman and a particular man who come together «in the presence of God and these witnesses» to ask for our blessing to have sex, make a home together, conceive and nurture children, be faithful and ask forgiveness when unfaithful, disagree over the budget, argue over politics, and have sex.

A few days ago, a senior member of the NPP on one of the TV stations said that, there is a particular man who had brought in 1 million cedis to support their [NPP] campaign and that man has not been sorted out yet.

Not exact matches

For instance, a team out of Ohio State University has demonstrated that men in particular who post a ton of selfies are more likely to display psychopathic tendencies.

For example, they can show a particular Cheetos ad only to single men aged 17 to 41 who live in New York, are Yankee fans and enjoy the «World of Warcraft» video game.

The founders of our nation, such as Thomas Paine, recognized the distinction between principles and men - between the virtues of a nation and the individuals who lead it at any particular time.

By adjusting the gap, this razor can be used by men who shave in any particular way or angle (including against the grain).

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

In sexual matters, when he leered at female passersby he was sometimes simply a «leg - man» or more often the Kinda - Guy - Who (indulges in particular practices).

And somehow I had deceived myself that my particular kind of greed was more pardonable than that of men who fill their sprawling garages with antique motor cars or drape themselves in the costliest lines of designer suits.

We have to ask these particular questions since women who happen to be married to ministers are still around in rather large numbers, while men who happen to be married to ministers are still relatively few.

I know pacifism isn't the issue pre se here but I find many principles of either pacifism or NVR are giving with examples that seem to fit that particular belief and men are lauded who successfully utilized it - but rarely are those circumstances repeated.

The times I have gone out and given blessing bags to the homeless and prayed with them have always ended up blessing me in the end... one in particular was an elderly man who when we gave him a hug... oh man you could tell that was the one thing he really needed... He just began to weep... I would suggest getting outside your comfort zone and do it... I promise you you will not regret it!

However, if we are humbly though critically ready to put up with the fellowship in its particular local manifestation, where and as we find it, we shall help to renew and strengthen it, at the same time discovering for ourselves the deepening of Christian discipleship and finding that we are enriched by other men and women who, like ourselves, are seeking to live in the Christian way, informed by the Christian faith, and supported by Christian worship.

God is not only disclosed in him, nor is revelation confined to «biblical times»; but Jesus is the supreme disclosure which opens my eyes to God in the present, and while remaining a man who lived in a particular historical situation, he will always be the unique focus of my perception of and response to God.

Lots of good men and women of all colors who aren't of particular political persuasion.

The same writer says on page 38: «Jesus is the supreme disclosure which opens my eyes to God in the present, and while remaining a man who lived in a particular historical situation, he will always be the unique focus of my perception of and response to God.»

For this anthropology man is the creature of possibility who needs confirmation by others and by himself in order that he may be and become the particular man that he is.

Christianity teaches that this particular individual, and so every individual, whatever in other respects this individual may be, man, woman, serving - maid, minister of state, merchant, barber, student, etc. — this individual exists before God — this individual who perhaps would be vain for having once in his life talked with the King, this man who is not a little proud of living on intimate terms with that person or the other, this man exists before God, can talk with God any moment he will, sure to be heard by Him; in short, this man is invited to live on the most intimate terms with God!

It's obnoxious and ignorant of this man to waste money on taking away something many find comfort in, just as obnoxious as it is to attempt to push a particular theory of God on anyone who is not asking to be redirected.

Furthermore the loving offerings and sufferings of holy men and women across the ages can, through the Church, bear fruit in particular ways and can be applied for particular needs that may not have been explicitly known about by those who actually made those Christocentric sacrifices.

«Christ, the Son who is of one being with the Father, is therefore the one who reveals God's plan for all creation and for man in particular.

There have been men who have been slaves to a particular sexual addiction for 40 YEARS who have found freedom, IN CHRIST!

Man is a finite cognitive being who is immanently present to himself precisely because, on the occasion of any particular finite being that manifests itself to him as he encounters it in experience, his cognition is intrinsically orientated and tends towards being in general.

But as every sensitive person ought to know and as every councilor (and every priest who has «heard confessions») does know, man's root problem is not in these particular acts.

With those who contend that «God is dead» I am at one in attesting the demise of a particular form of theistic belief which not only is unreasonable to contemporary men, but has also proved incapable of doing justice to the historic witness of the Christian community.

It is the business of men of faith to see to it that they employ the forms which, in a particular cultural environment, will give the clearest and most exact description of the content of their faith to the people who live in that environment.

Thus each group shouts that their particular invisible man is the right one, too often killing others who disagree.

No one knows who actually wrote it, but «the word of god» was carefully edited by a group of men in the year 325, in order to include only the content that supported their particular philosophy.

Two rabbis in particular provided special guidance for me: Nachmanides (Rabbi Moshe ben Nachman), a thirteenth - century Spanish scholar, philosopher, physician, and poet, a renaissance man who brought a kabbalistic or mystical orientation to the text, and Samson Raphael Hirsch, a nineteenth - century German Orthodox rabbi who expressed an uncanny ecological perspective.

But once a pertinent change of character has been obtained, Hartshorne feels that further punishment of a particular man is ethically unjustified — even though it may have some political justification as society's best means of appeasing the anger of those who have been victimized by the «guilty party.

The setting is important not only for understanding men like the prophet Amos or the Apostle Paul who speak directly to particular problems they face, but it is also vitally important for authors who write about historical events.

Paul Tillich, who has done so much to clarify the relationship between theology and psychiatry, rightly insists that the religious dimension of healing is related to, but goes beyond, the cure of particular neuroses.3 What Tillich calls «ontological anxiety» and «personal guilt» arise within man's «ultimate concern.»

Craig maybe the definition of teaching men under authority is limited to that particular area within the church.But that does nt stop God from working outside those constraints.Mother Etta and no doubt other women felt compelled to preach the gospel such as women missionaries.Mother Etta preached the gospel and many were saved people were healed just as in the day of the disciples it is the same Jesus that saves and delivered from from sin and disease not the fact that it was a man who spoke behind the altar.Why do you find it hard to see that God can use women just like he uses men to witness for him.The call to witness for Christ is for everyone not just men and not just in a church situation.When we limit God to a narrow view it limits the effectiveness of the gospel.

The countless experiments and results, facts and data of any particular element, to me, is like working out the dynamics of a bicycle created by the hands of a man who poured countless hours forming its structure.

There is no particular point in producing pressures of evil against a man or woman who moves harmlessly and respectably with the normal currents of contemporary human living.

In particular we should look to the examples of the holy men and women over the history of the Church, for «in him who died and rose again for our salvation, the examples of faith that have marked these two thousand years of our salvation history are brought into the fullness of light» (ibid).

For there can be no «common good» if there are only the particular goods of particular men and women who are each acting out their own particular willfulness.

«Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will among men, and that is just what they did except there were so many of them that there was a fair amount of crowding and jockeying for position, with the result that one particular angel, a girl about nine years old who was smaller than most of them, ended up so far out on the fringes of things that not even by craning her neck and standing on tiptoe could she see what was going on.

By «truth» is meant at least that in the Word, become flesh in a man Who was born and lived in a particular time and in a cultural environment and religious heritage which He reflected, we are given an authentic and sufficient view of the nature and purpose of the universe and are enabled to call God «Father.»

Or conversely, «I and the Father are one, and yet I am this particular lowly man, poor, forsaken, delivered into the hands of men — blessed is he who shall not be offended in me.

If such be the case, then Hegel is right when in his chapter on «The Good and the Conscience,» he characterizes man merely as the particular and regards this character as «a moral form of the evil» which is to be annulled in the teleology of the moral, so that the individual who remains in this stage is either sinning or subjected to temptation (Anfechtung).

«Christ, the Son who is of one being with the Father, is therefore the one who reveals God's plan for all creation and for man in particular...» [He] fully reveals man to man himself and makes his supreme calling clear... By his incarnation the Son of God united himself in some sense with every man».

A good friend recently asked me if I could put together a few ideas for finger foods that she could easily serve up to guests, but men in particular, as she lives with a few hockey / football loving males who spend a lot of time glued to their TV sets in the early fall watching Sunday sports.

When Harry Guggenheim is drawn out on his philosophies about racing, he speaks with the conviction of a hardheaded, not overly imaginative man who is delighted to find in this particular sport an element of life lacking in the day - to - day conduct of other businesses.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

The only man responsible for change at Arsenal is Kreonke but isn't a football fan he is busy counting cows at his ranch, if you give someone a contract to do a job and the job isn't done well who takes responsibility the one who give the contract to a particular person or the one who performed the contract?

we have become so reliant upon one individual to run the whole operation that our once relevant scouting department has become so stagnant that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once... when this occurs the management team, who by this juncture is little more than a congregation of spefically chosen «yes» men, making it incredibly difficult for new ideas to emerge and / or transfers / contract renegotiations to be dealt with in a timely and effective manner... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

negatives -LRB--)-- terrible result — wengers team selection (arteta + ozil in particular)-- generally poor work - rate across the pitch and nothing like the backbone we showed against man city — handing dortmund initiative to top the group (we all know what finishing 2nd means)-- lack of hunger + desire — welbeck misses — still no joel campbell (who in my personal opinion is a big game / stage player)-- in all our «set - piece» training we totally forgot about the bread and butter of football which is making an impact in open play