Sentences with phrase «particular plaintiffs in this case»

A second judge argued that the statute was even unconstitutional as applied to the particular plaintiffs in this case, who included several defendants who wished to publish swinger ads in the magazine illustrated with sexually - explicit pictures but did not want to sacrifice their anonymity.

Not exact matches

The plaintiff in this particular case is Franciscan, which is a religion - affiliated health care provider.

In the legal world, the first point is referred to as «standing,» that is, whether plaintiffs have a right to bring a particular case to court.

The case doesn't advocate for any particular solution to reduce emissions but if the plaintiffs win, it would mean winding down oil and gas production in the state.

Of particular interest are the statements in Paragraph 5.7 which may provide a connecting thread to the ECJ's Rottmann and Lounes case - law on the consequences of naturalisation as a Dutch citizens on the plaintiff's continuing retention of UK nationality.

In denying the plaintiff's request for a new trial, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that instructions incorporating a legal analysis on the shifting burdens of proof in employment discriminbation cases established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 is appropriate when a trial court judge «translate [s] it into everyday parlance and fit [s] it to the facts and circumstancews of a particular case.&raquIn denying the plaintiff's request for a new trial, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that instructions incorporating a legal analysis on the shifting burdens of proof in employment discriminbation cases established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 is appropriate when a trial court judge «translate [s] it into everyday parlance and fit [s] it to the facts and circumstancews of a particular case.&raquin employment discriminbation cases established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 is appropriate when a trial court judge «translate [s] it into everyday parlance and fit [s] it to the facts and circumstancews of a particular case.&raquin 1973 is appropriate when a trial court judge «translate [s] it into everyday parlance and fit [s] it to the facts and circumstancews of a particular case.»

Both the trial judge and the Court of Appeal held that the case was adversarial, and was not being brought for the benefit of or in the interests of the plan as a whole, but for the particular class of plan members representative by the plaintiffs.

The particular circumstances of the case, which include the relative ages of the plaintiff and defendant, the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant, and the repetitive nature of the abuse, will be considered in relationship to the establishment of the egregiousness of the defendant's conduct and the severity of the plaintiff's resulting emotional distress.

This case holds that specific jurisdiction over a defendant arising solely from the fact that it sold a defective product in a particular state or country which it caused an injury to be limited to plaintiffs who actually purchased the product or suffered an injury in that state.

[44] In my view, there are a number of cases provided to me by the plaintiff which are of particular value.

In both cases, the plaintiffs suffered serious distress, but could not prove that their health problems were due to pollution from a particular industry.

Of particular concern in this case was that the plaintiff had been referred to as a liar, and is a member of the bar,

[23] In this case particular weight is given to the plaintiff's age, his stoicism in the circumstances of the accident, and the emotional suffering of such a young plaintifIn this case particular weight is given to the plaintiff's age, his stoicism in the circumstances of the accident, and the emotional suffering of such a young plaintifin the circumstances of the accident, and the emotional suffering of such a young plaintiff.

So make sure you find an injury lawyer in Kansas City who has plenty of experience representing plaintiffs in injury cases in your particular state.

On the other hand, damages that are punitive are not intended to compensate a plaintiff for a particular loss, so they may be taxed as income, in certain cases.

He stated that more evidence was necessary to «do justice between the parties» because: 1) the case turned on credibility, the Plaintiff's in particular; the Plaintiff denied consenting to the tooth removal, even though the Defendants» records suggested otherwise.

It is interesting in that particular case that the Plaintiff decided to call three physicians and give evidence himself, as opposed to calling evidence of treatment providers and others that could corroborate the change in function but ultimately, the Court concluded that the Plaintiff himself by giving evidence can corroborate the change of function and therefore corroborate the evidence of the medical doctors who were called to support the Plaintiff's injuries and that those injuries met the threshold.

In addition, Travis represents plaintiffs and defendants in complex business matters with a particular emphasis on technology, marketing and media disputes, copyrights and trademarks, along with fiduciary litigation, partnership and shareholder disputes and other «business divorce» caseIn addition, Travis represents plaintiffs and defendants in complex business matters with a particular emphasis on technology, marketing and media disputes, copyrights and trademarks, along with fiduciary litigation, partnership and shareholder disputes and other «business divorce» casein complex business matters with a particular emphasis on technology, marketing and media disputes, copyrights and trademarks, along with fiduciary litigation, partnership and shareholder disputes and other «business divorce» cases.

[22] Having regard to the range of non-pecuniary damages awarded in the cases cited by the parties, and the particular circumstances of the plaintiff, I find an award of $ 7,000 is appropriate.

Without an evidentiary bridge to the specific circumstances of the plaintiff, statistical evidence is of little assistance, which is why such general trends are not determinative in particular cases.

And to those that worry that Philip Morris eviscerates optimal deterrence, consider cases like those presented in the Supreme Court's TXO decision, where an augmented damages award could be justified based on potential harm to the particular plaintiff on account of the tortfeasor's concealment or deceit.

While the plaintiff failed to make out an «invasion of seclusion» in this particular case, there appeared to be no hesitation in applying the tort to Telus» conduct.

In this particular case, it appeared that the harm suffered or likely to be suffered by the plaintiff was rather low, and suffered before the alleged distribution to third - parties occurred,

«In particular, in the first medical action, there are no limitation period issues and the case is purely about the medical care rendered to the plaintifIn particular, in the first medical action, there are no limitation period issues and the case is purely about the medical care rendered to the plaintifin the first medical action, there are no limitation period issues and the case is purely about the medical care rendered to the plaintiff.

[93] The assessment of non-pecuniary damages depends on the particular circumstances of the plaintiff in each case.