There is a physical prehension of the datum according to
a particular subjective form.
Not exact matches
The solution remains mathematically deficient in an important sense until the mathematician has spelled it out, i.e., has set it out in an explicit, discursive
form which stands on its own merits, independent of the
particular subjective experience whose objective content the mathematician has sought to display in the explicit formulae.
It is the function of a
particular kind of complex integration of physical and conceptual feelings which yields the higher intellectual feelings with the
subjective form of consciousness.
Furthermore, the
particular experiences interpreted as religious on the basis of the categoreal feelings and
subjective forms considered in this essay will differ accordingly from those expounded on the basis of an alternative value judgment.
The
subjective form in a
particular actual entity, he tells us, unlike the abstract eternal object, is an «element in the private definiteness of that actuality» (PR 444), and the
subjective form can not be torn apart from its
particular subject without becoming a mere universal (PR 354, 356).
This final integration of
subjective form does not obviate the role of the individual
subjective form of a
particular occasion, however, since «the consequent nature of God is composed of a multiplicity of elements with individual self - realization» (PR 531; italics added).
On the other hand, B may prehend A in such a way that the fact that it is A which it is prehending is of paramount importance for the
subjective form of B rather than the
particular aspect of A by which A is objectified.
Specifically, the
particular complex
form of final
subjective response centrally depends on the settled characters of antecedent experiencers.
«Consciousness» for Whitehead has a more restricted use applying to the
subjective form of
particular types of intellectual feelings; thus something much broader in Whitehead's conceptuality must be found.
Some end is in view, and it is partly in the light of that end that the prehensions have the
particular force they have and the
subjective forms that are associated with them.
How this interaction takes place is determined by the
subjective form, which is the
particular mood or attitude by which the subject prehends a
particular datum.
This unique perspective of subject upon object is its «
subjective form» (PR 35), or
particular affective tonality with reference only to this object as apprehended by this subject.
But to say, in any realist sense, that this is the «best» book of the year is pretty ridiculous, as even the best read critics in a
particular genre or
form have read only a fraction of those written, and even then the decision process is hugely
subjective.
In a way, each of Gallace's paintings is somehow two paintings at once: rigorously abstract (not in the sense that an abstract painting is abstract, but in the sense that a syllogism is abstract — a
form or template whose
particular contents can be filled in) and generic, yet also haunted by feelings, memories, and reverberations that may be profoundly
subjective and therefore private and in part incommunicable.
There
particular personalities (one
subjective and sensitive, the other cerebral and pragmatic)
form a necessary duality in the process, and in the work that results.
With a
particular interest in the
subjective and objective readings of reality and the various relationships we
form with technology, their works challenge our prescriptions of knowledge, control, and what it means to be human in an age of advanced technology.