I think what Viola is saying is that many churches seem to put their pastor up as the head, or the denomination, or the doctrinal statement, or
a particular system of theology, or the Bible.
If you have ever tried to discuss theology with someone who holds strongly to
a particular system of theology, you know that this is how many of these discussions go.
Not exact matches
Each continues,
of course, to console himself with the delusion that his special
system of theology or his
particular interpretation
of the meaning
of the Word
of God constitutes a universal frame
of reference within which the other person is or ought to be included and that consequently communication between them ought to be possible.
Unlike philosophy
of religion and
theology, however, the history
of religions does not «indorse» any
particular system offered by the diverse religions
of the world, nor does it advocate, as many ultra-liberals think it ought, any new universal synthetic religion.
System - building may also be morally misguided, for it tends «to preclude the possibility
of a more sensitive encounter with realities at the edge
of our being» (FFS 129f), and these are precisely the realities to which
theology in
particular ought to attend.