Throughout the biennale proceedings I was repeatedly reminded of one
particular thought from an interview earlier this year with ACCRA [dot] Alt's Sionne Neely.
Not exact matches
«When I
think of where I would go for protection
from prompt effects, and
from the blast wave in
particular, I
think of the same kinds of things that we do for tornadoes,» Buddemeier said.
Try to imagine the possible outcomes of any
particular decision, and
think about potential snags that might ensue
from it.
Co-founder and CEO Eli Pariser, whose site first staked a reputation for re-packaging liberal stories, says the move to partner with a traditional network (and MSNBC in
particular) is one that makes sense for both companies: «We had a meeting with NBCU and realized that we were
thinking about a bunch of the same things, and that it would be fun to collaborate on a project,» he says, by «bringing together what we learned
from curating a lot of video for purpose - driven millennials, and what they know about visual video storytelling,» he tells Inc. exclusively.
In
particular, simply overdoing it by eating a huge lunch before a major project can keep you
from thinking clearly.
But I was just amazed by how everyone, young and old wanted to be involved... and was so deeply enriched and touched by the experience and the laughter and the love I experienced
from the people I met and how women would in
particular open their hearts to me and tell me the stories of where they've come
from, particularly because I have the language and was coming there as a woman and just how touched they were that I was there as a woman
from England who's learned the language and who's an artist and running this project and come all the way to see them so they didn't feel forgotten I
think that was pretty much what they felt... that their stories were being heard so they don't feel forgotten knowing the tents would be around the world.
I
think the short - term challenge for us that is creating some headwind is the shift in where a lot of the business in the department store channel, in
particular, is coming
from.
We typically
think about people coming
from business to occupy positions in the administration that have a
particular oversight or much more direct daily interaction with the business community itself.
In
particular, we
think select defense companies could benefit
from Macron's plans to boost spending on security.
What do you
think it is about this group of students in this
particular moment that feels like a break
from the past?
«Growing concern about climate change —
from society in general, and
from long - term shareholders in
particular — has forced oil companies to
think about the implications of a transition to a low - carbon economy.
And in fact, the days I feel I've improved the most as an investor are usually the days where I am away
from my computer screen deep in
thought, reading something useful, or having productive conversations with someone that knows more about a
particular business than I do.
If you believe in active management over passive management (i.e., you
think there is value to someone choosing
particular stocks over a broad - based index), then you will prefer mutual funds (Yes, there are several actively - managed ETFs, but not enough to choose
from at this point).
All you
think about is how much you could be making
from a
particular investment class without realizing how much you could lose as well.
To
think that some bunch of people,
from one
particular religious sect, can unilaterally decide to say some dead person is «baptised», and to
think that such a declaration means anything at all for the spirit (if any) of the deceased, is bizarre.
I await confirmation
from the researchers at
Think Progress, but I suspect that the religious right's obsession with morays in
particular and eels in general, derives not
from the canonical Book of Job but
from the non-canonical early church writing, The Epistle of Barnabas, which in verse 10:5 reads:
And in some instances, it has been Scalia and Thomas who have done so more than those who may
think of themselves less as originalists (in one recent case in
particular Scalia and Thomas dissented
from the majority which held that convicted child molesters could be indefinitely imprisoned despite having fully served their sentences based on subtle shifts of language and the over-application of prior case law — no one wants a child molester free and about, but such results focused outcomes are always dangerous).
I only recently emerged
from that
particular group and it was mainly because of
thinking like that.
I
think a fast
from verbosity about religion may help the religious people to see how religion - free people may indeed lack nothing, but instead, their «envelope» is just a
particular sort of clothing — not necessary but fun for them perhaps.
Kevin your right personal beliefs and or religion does not belong in law, and I am not saying that what this atheist organization is doing is wrong or anything, I
think what there doing is a good thing, I just
think this
particular message could have been done
from a different perspective, this message makes them appear like the self righteous ones, and it might give out the wrong kind of message, instead it should have said something like you believe in god fine, but don't put it in our laws.
It is too long to quote in full here, but one has only to
think of a few of the powerful and
particular images that situate the joy of the «swinger of birches» within the real and fallen world: the ice like broken glass, the trees bent by weather, the face that «burns and tickles with the cobwebs / Broken across it,» and the eye watering «
From a twig's having lashed across it open.»
Sean Doherty of Living Out (and my conversation partner later in this article) has reflected that: «People can have a
particular sense of shame and wanting to hide this
from God... I
think secrecy is common in lots of parts of the Church.»
Just as history brings freedom
from rigid role definitions, it may also give us the freedom to
think seriously again about what it means to be not simply a unisex parent, but a mother or father in
particular.
To be clear about this and about the
particular point of view
from which one
thinks, can move one toward objectivity, while never achieving it.
I had
thought I was starting one
particular chapter of my life, one that brought me a lot of joy — tinies growing into marvellous big kids, finally emerging
from the fog of babies - toddlers mothering, and a strong sense of purpose around my own vocation, for instance — but when I flipped the page, there was unprecedented change for us.
Human
thought is always
from a
particular point of view.
The deductions
from it in this
particular sphere of
thought can not be looked upon as more than suggestions as to how the problem is transformed in the light of that system.»
We do
think of colors, shapes, and even qualities of feeling, not only as qualifications of
particular actual entities but also apart
from such qualification.
Is not this whole mode of
thought simply part of the evil legacy
from deism, in which God was conceived as being absent
from his world, and in which therefore he must be
thought to «intrude» into his world, to «intervene» in it, whenever he would act in any distinctive and
particular way?
This is the
particular temptation of the strong, for as long as one has good health, a congenial and lucrative job, social standing, and a fine family, one is apt not to
think much about needing anything
from God.
Philosophy is critical, imaginative, and comprehensive
thinking that strives to free itself
from the conditioning of
particular traditions and communities, whereas a criterion for the selection of a philosophy by a theologian should be its sharing of a basic vision of reality.
As Ochs puts it, SR developed
from the
particular logic of scripture itself: «I
think SR is a return to how the primary community has tended to read scripture throughout history.
As might be expected
from a religion which is not the product of any
particular human way of
thinking but the result of a planned revelation, Christianity is of universal application.
Intellectuals as such have no
particular responsibility to take time away
from what they know best to immerse themselves in the intricacies of political life and
thought, but absent such immersion they would do well not to give public utterance to their ignorance.
«Adaptation» is sometimes taken to mean that
particular teachings are merely to be adapted to relevant cultural settings; for instance, reinterpreting Western
thought from an Asian perspective.
At the same time, scientific
thought in all these areas is far
from unified or complete, and there is no
particular urgency to reconcile every discrepancy at this time.
The Spirit was Jesus as
Thought who received actualization in the form of a
particular historical human kind, «a living being
from clay».
Be it with the vision of the eye or of the mind, we can only see things
from the
particular perspective we happen to occupy There is, for us, no Archimedean fulcrum outside the spatiotemporal historicity of place and era for pivoting the lever of
thought.
Anyway, this new book by Philip Wesley Comfort looks at a large number of the variant readings
from the textual families, and briefly explains what the variations are, and what Comfort
thinks is the best reading for a
particular variant.
Steve Weissman severely criticizes the death - of - God theologians (with the possible exception of Altizer) for the absence
from their
thought of «some secular standard by which this
particular intellectually normative and ethically good world might be judged» (NT 5:26).
Because all human laws, customs, and opinions change
from time to time and vary
from place to place, we tend to
think of right and wrong as relative to the
particular culture in which we live.
We can see this if we turn
from thinking about care for a
particular person to a problem for public policy.
He who
thinks that the world, without any such unity of significance as constitutes an experience, would still have been or might be a real world, and who deduces this
from the fact — which spiritualism accepts — that the world without a
particular human personality, Mr. X is perfectly possible, must also be one who
thinks that if
from «himself» those qualities which make him Mr. X were to be subtracted, nothing of the nature of mind would remain — in short, he is one who does not believe that other minds are members of himself.
«There are a number of voices,» says Gittins, «and one listens to them sympathetically, but at the end of the day I
think they don't detract
from the principle of inculturation as synonymous with incarnation of the faith in
particular places in the contemporary world.»
You seem to have highlighted
particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we
think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn
from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz
The same is true of many media reform efforts: by attempting to get people excited about liberal bias in the news, or nudity or profanity in a
particular program, or the ideological bent of a certain series, or whether a network is «Christian,» concerned leaders have diverted the attention of viewers
from the most important problem, the basic point, namely, that the whole process - of - television is providing us with a worldview which not only determines what we
think, but also how we
think and who we are.
As being can never be studied as an independent object, the history of metaphysical
thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the
particular form in which this problem presents itself changes
from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the
particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of
thought hitherto.
Although many philosophers in history have written
from a process perspective, the term today is reserved for a
particular school of
thought centered around the works of Alfred North Whitehead, whose philosophical writings spanned the two decades of the 1920's and 1930's and the two countries of England and the United States.
From Rebekah: As the wife of an Iraq veteran, I'd like to know your
thoughts on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and in
particular how they relate to fiscal conservatism and a pro-life stance.
«If your choices are between the existence of a huge number of universes, all of which exist for no
particular reason, and a Supreme Intelligence, existing by necessity, that selects contingent universes
from the realm of all possibilities for the sake of their value, anyone could be forgiven for
thinking that God is the simpler and more rational hypothesis.»