Quebec's non-judicial program, according to the website of the province's Ministry of Justice, is a way of «dealing with certain offences in
a particular way so as to better rationalize the use of resources allocated to the judicial system and not to unduly stigmatize the misconduct of an offender whose behaviour does not warrant judicial action.»
The Quebec Ministry of Justice, describes the non-judicial process as a means of «of dealing with certain offences in
a particular way so as to better rationalize the use of resources allocated to the judicial system and not to unduly stigmatize the misconduct of an offender whose behaviour does not warrant judicial action.»
However Flannery et al claim we have now loaded the dice which in gaming parlance means that you weight the dice in
a particular way so as to change the chance of probability and skew the results by artificially creating an imbalance in the die itself causing the same number to be rolled over and over again.
In his interview with Young Artists in Conversation (YAC), Bowen states: «They are made of the certain materials and look that
particular way so they convey the idea.»
As always the brand creates pieces for the home in
a particular way so that you could freely put them on outside as well.
But if there is a God and He created the universe, who are we to question how He moves or to insist that He moves in
a particular way so that we can verify it?
Not exact matches
If nothing else, says Rahn, it's stretching the venture capitalists of the world very thin: They're involved with
so many companies, that they don't have much time or attention to lend their expertise and advice to any
particular one in a meaningful
way.
A recent post in the Guardian suggests Canadian companies that operate globally — in this
particular case, e-book seller Kobo — could be hurt by
so - called anti-terror measures in the same
way that National Security Agency spying has negatively affected the interests of U.S. businesses abroad.
It turns out that even those who stress
particular negotiation behaviors and attitudes see those things not as hollow gambits but as the natural performance traits of the smarter negotiator you must become — by
way of better preparation, rational thinking, and
so on.
But I was just amazed by how everyone, young and old wanted to be involved... and was
so deeply enriched and touched by the experience and the laughter and the love I experienced from the people I met and how women would in
particular open their hearts to me and tell me the stories of where they've come from, particularly because I have the language and was coming there as a woman and just how touched they were that I was there as a woman from England who's learned the language and who's an artist and running this project and come all the
way to see them
so they didn't feel forgotten I think that was pretty much what they felt... that their stories were being heard
so they don't feel forgotten knowing the tents would be around the world.
So that's one
way to take the problem we have and solve it right away while still being involved in something similar, or in that
particular space.
Trump doesn't like to be wrong
so if he's digging his heels into the ground on a
particular industry or company — trade it that
way because he's not going to stop.
So if you're a young woman in New Hampshire with a specific kind of personality and a
particular set of issues that you care about, our research allows us to connect with that voter in a
way that truly resonates with her.»
With consumers becoming
so savvy and
so particular about how they receive their information, we need to be thinking about how to reach them in more efficient
ways in a manner that they actually like.
In this
particular case, the FBI did have other
ways for gathering information about the shooters, but for whatever reason were unable to maximize that effort, and
so they turned to Apple to do the work for them.
With
so much happening in the areas of social media in
particular, Google has to find
ways to differentiate themselves and counter competitive advantages to protect their core income stream.
In
particular, no major central bank uses policy rules in a prescriptive
way, and it is hard to predict the consequences of requiring the FOMC to do
so, as some have proposed.
So I praise Santorum for choosing to run for president despite the fact that he knew he already had pressing and touchy familial issues that could come into conflict with his duties as a candidate — let alone the
ways in which the importance that those
particular issues could run counter to what he was obligated to do as president.
LDS / Mormon is very different than a subset of Christianity (most Christians don't consider it Christianity at all), and therefore since it is not as well known as mainline Christianity (Catholic and Protestant), criticizing
particular details (hair - splitting) is still useful on educating others on LDS beliefs — even if done
so in a negative
way.
To touch on everything that attributed to their specialness would make for an epically long comment,
so I'll just touch on the basics (and I feel the need to add a disclaimer here: I am in no
way implying these things apply to * every * Baptist church, just this
particular one.)
Thus... the function of his primordial nature is to hold the possible worlds together by his appetition for them all,
so that all are relevant in one
way or another, to any
particular world which occurs in the course of nature.
So, when God has fully prehended the past actual world for a
particular standpoint, and unified it in all the alternative
ways it can be unified, she bequeaths that prehensive activity to the nascent occasion, which alone can effect its determinate actualization.
You see that although many translations try to be straight from the Greek or Hebrew, they also build on previous translations,
so that if a
particular translation has a long tradition, the tradition might get carried forward, even if that
way of translating the word or idea is not the best.
this
particular group acts this
way so they must... um... BE this
way»?
So what I will be talking about, this morning in
particular, is two different
ways of seeing the Christian tradition, of seeing Christianity.
It is, however, a special problem, both because some people pray in sickness who never think of doing
so at any other time and because it unites in a
particular way all the other types of petition.
In
particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the
so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward
way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).
Orwin goes on to say that Liberal Democracy doesn't work like that in practice because it actually assumes a
particular conception of the good: «For
so long as you observe prevailing liberal democratic norms on all fundamental social questions, you're free in merely secondary matters to continue in the
ways of your ancestors.»
That's convenient — rely on a
particular image of this version of «god» for
so long, which by the
way is depicted this
way on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, until people start realizing it's nothing more than another version of Santa, then simply move the goal posts by suddenly claiming «Huh?
In the same
way that the sacred points to the God who is in all reality,
so worship — while it may be something we do in a separate time and place dedicated to this
particular purpose — must point to a life that is lived towards that which we worship.
There are several arguments that can be advanced against this position: first, that there is no need to adapt or interpret the Bible this
way because this «modern common sense» is quite uncommon; second, that the current popularity of a belief or point of view is no guarantee of its truth,
so the Bible ought not to be adapted to suit the understanding of a
particular time; third, that the Bible can not be adapted to this common sense, because this common sense excludes God; and fourth, that if our common sense disagrees with the Bible, then we must change our common sense after all, because the Bible is true.
In arguing against the possibility of attaining to a neutral standpoint on matters of concern to religious persons, one begins with the axiom that all human activity — and
so, by extension, all scholarly activity, all religious activity, and all interaction among serious religious persons — both implies and evinces a commitment to some
particular metaphysic, some view as to the
way things are and as to how human activity should proceed in that context.
It would also, I hope, go some
way toward remedying the privatization and trivialization of religious commitment that is
so endemic to both American culture in general and to academic institutions in
particular.
The power of the television industry has acted in this
way to shape the public perception of American religious life and culture, not
so much by the creation of a
particular phenomenon, but by the selective promotion of one
particular expression over another in a
way that distorts the factual situation.
As I have warned
so often, there is here no guarantee of any
particular social good, but at least there is ground for hope that in
ways beyond our present understanding the powers of the «age to come,» the work of the living Christ, the influence of the Holy Spirit, the impact of that within the church which Paul Tillich calls the «New Being» will break through many of the obstacles in the secular order to transform and transform again the kingdoms of this world.
Averroës proposed to correct Avicenna in two
ways: first, that the essence of corporeal form lies in indeterminate dimensions, thus asserting the priority of spatiality in the abstract over the
particular incidental form of a body, its
so - called determinate dimensions; second, a characterization of corporeal form as «merely the capacity of prime matter for natural motion and as merely the tendency to move to its natural place» (CM 40), a harbinger of the formalities of dynamics to come.
Since the constant in the New Testament is the centrality of Jesus and his message, and not any
particular explanation of why and how he is central, we are then free to interpret this centrality in a
way that meets the needs of our own day and our own common sense,
so long as we remain compatible with the basic thrust of Jesus» teaching.
Finally, there is the danger of denying proper proportion or patterning, in such a
way that one
particular element or aspect of the relationship is made
so central that its wholeness or totality is denied or at least called into question.
So one of the most rewarding elements of this
particular creative experience was the
way it inspired companion works from other artists.
So the real way Burke succumbed to «historicism» — or something like it — was in attributing too much significance to a particular political event, and so in having too little confidence in (or at least faith in) in the resilience of human natur
So the real
way Burke succumbed to «historicism» — or something like it — was in attributing too much significance to a
particular political event, and
so in having too little confidence in (or at least faith in) in the resilience of human natur
so in having too little confidence in (or at least faith in) in the resilience of human nature.
A good example: I've been playing a videogame of late with a combination Greek / fantasy pantheon in which the player - character is a very faithful servant of a
particular goddess, knows other gods exist (because killing them / beating them up is the main plot of the game), and winds up with an ally who can clearly see that the gods exist but only cares about following himself —
so there's a mix there of misotheism with a few of the gods (they are there, but they're evil), faithful worship (serving a good goddess), and nay theism («You gods are selfish jerks, I'm going my own
way!»).
But its access to a possible
way of explaining red would also differ from that of a being which had developed a
particular sensibility for good or for ill with respect to a
particular shade of red,
so that the perception in question would give rise to pleasant or unpleasant feelings.
On the other hand,
so - called «Christians» have certainly gone out of their
way to try to prevent believers of other religious traditions from practicing their faith — by trying to impose their
particular brands of «Christianity» onto all others under the law.
But God ordered his world in such a
way that his own work within that world takes place not least through one of his creatures in
particular, namely, the human beings who reflect his image... He has enlisted us to act as his stewards in the project of creation...
So the objection about us trying to build God's kingdom by our own efforts, though it seems humble and pious, can actually be a
way of hiding from responsibility, of keeping one's head well down when the boss is looking for volunteers...» (207).
I mean, communicated from a divine source by Jesus Christ as God, through inspired prophets and wise men, apostles, teachers, the writers of the books of the Bible, councils of church leaders, popes, and
so on, in such a
way that the message has been transmitted in human language, clothed in the external forms of human thought, given, indeed, in the characteristic language and thought - forms of
particular nations and cultures, but at the same time in such a
way that its essential content has been unaffected by the human mind's fallibility, ignorance and feebleness of apprehension.
The idea of cultural evolution, which is most clearly seen in humankind, is that humankind transmits information from one generation to another by teaching and learning
so that successive generations learn to purpose their lives in
particular ways.
Jeremy i think satanic forces is more likely in that
particular storm with Jesus and his disciples in the boat that was to test his disciples faith and they failed the test.Jesus rebuked the storm there was a power that was out to destroy them why else would he rebuke it maybe he was waiting foir them to rebuke it themselves they had prayed for people and seen healing they had commanded evil spirit to come out of people
so they were aware of the power of God.Yet they were in fear of there lives faithless and afriad.Paul on his
way to rome was caught in a storm and through an angel paul was told many would die Paul interceeded for the crew and lives on board and God promised that all would be spared.Paul had warned them before the voyage that it would end in disaster but they did not listen.Satan wasnt happy with that plan because he had hoped to kill as many people as possible there was over 300 souls on board and many had been expected to die.
So satan attempted to kill Paul and he was bitten by a snake but satan is no match for Jesus Christ he has been defeated and
so Paul lived and continued to preach the gospel was many being saved.brentnz
Even if a
particular pattern of major complexity were attempted with the same people, the same calls in the same order, the same costumes, the same caller, and
so on, there would be no
way to guarantee that it could be danced in exactly the same pattern.
So I conclude by returning to this theme of Christianity as a sacrament of the sacred — as a tradition that mediates the reality of God to us — and the Bible as a collection of stories that invites us to see in a
particular way, to see reality in a certain
way, and to see our own lives in a certain
way.
And where more than in Hamlet, set in a
particular place and time with a limited cast of characters interrelated in quite specific
ways, do we experience the mysterious and ironic disproportion between mere spatial dimension and the immensely more extensive structural and thematic dimension that characterizes the fractal that figures
so prominently in chaos theory?