Sentences with phrase «parties accept the conclusion»

[2] The parties accept the conclusion of the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Parker (2000), 2000 CanLII 5762 (ON CA), 146 C.C.C. (3d) 193, that a blanket prohibition on medical access to marihuana infringes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Not exact matches

That conclusion may come about not simply by the Tories being generally accepted by voters as the English party.

The governor, a Democrat, also said he would order his campaign and party «not to accept campaign contributions from companies once a Request for Proposals has been announced, and for six months after the conclusion for the winner.

In the November 2016 statement, Cuomo vowed, «I will order my campaign and my party not to accept campaign contributions from companies once a Request for Proposals has been announced, and for six months following the conclusion for the winner,» adding, «I believe the other state offices and the legislature should do the same and will propose such a law.»

The parties both accept the well - supported science results and conclusions.

The Supreme Court's core conclusion was that it is the serving of the Art 50 notice that affects the rights of the individual because of the automatic withdrawal (accepted by all parties to the litigation) that follows two years later.

Although the three additional provisions were likely added only to increase clarity and confirm the parties» intention as stated in s. 2 (2), the Court concluded that most of these provisions would have been redundant if the employer's interpretation of s. 2 (2) was accepted, thereby lending further support to the Court's conclusion that s. 2 (2) did not clearly limit Holm's entitlement.

Interestingly, the Advocate General ranged much more broadly in reaching the same conclusion, stating that these limitations on the review of international arbitral awards were «contrary to the principle of effectiveness of EU law», «(n) o system can accept infringements of its most fundamental rules making up its public policy, irrespective of whether or not those infringements are flagrant or obvious» and «one or more parties to agreements which might be regarded as anticompetitive can not put these agreements beyond the reach of review under Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU by resorting to arbitration» (AG Op § § 58, 67 and 72).

«The carefully reasoned judgment of Lady Justice Arden reaches what I would suggest is the logical conclusion that if the Ombudsman's decision is accepted, it is final and binding on both parties, and the complainant should not be entitled to a second bite of the cherry through the courts.

It can strengthen a relationship if the different conclusion can be accepted by both parties.