However, in order to protect
all parties against fraud, we may require additional information and / or proof of identity to be submitted before we can process your withdrawal request.
Not exact matches
Another major advantage is an advanced protection
against fraud and third -
party interference.
To the extent permitted by law, we will disclose your information to government authorities or third
parties if: (a) required to do so by law, or in response to a subpoena or court order; (b) we believe in our sole discretion that disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect
against fraud, to protect the property or other rights of us or other users, third
parties or the public at large; or (c) we believe that you have abused the Sites or the Applications by using them to attack other systems or to gain unauthorized access to any other system, to engage in spamming or otherwise to violate applicable laws.
A former deputy governor of Osun state and a key chieftain of the People's Democratic
Party, PDP, Iyiola Omisore, has accused the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of blackmail over allegation of
fraud being leveled
against him.
It is obvious that all the major
parties need to be seen to take a strong position
against benefit
fraud (so obvious that it featured in the first episode of The Thick of It), but the problem comes when telling people they are no longer entitled to a benefit because they don't need it.
Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State, on Friday, challenged President Muhammadu Buhari to direct the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to charge the Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP) National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh to court if the commission was sure of evidences of
fraud against him, saying «the EFCC appears to be operating a system in which an accused person is first arrested, detained endlessly while the anti-corruption agency goes about looking for evidence.»
«We are appealing to the National Executive Committee of our great
Party to have the elections held at Ningo Prampram Constituency investigated thoroughly, and if the allegations
against Samuel Nartey George are proven, annul the results of the elections and punish him severely for perpetuating such electoral
fraud in his bid to short change the will of the people of Ningo Prampram Constituency and bring the NDC
Party into disrepute.»
Deputy national publicity secretary of the Peoples Democratic
Party (PDP), Abdullahi Jalo, wants Olisa Metuh, to relinquish his position as the party's spokesman, following the allegations of fraud levelled against
Party (PDP), Abdullahi Jalo, wants Olisa Metuh, to relinquish his position as the
party's spokesman, following the allegations of fraud levelled against
party's spokesman, following the allegations of
fraud levelled
against him.
The trustees also authorized the district's lawyers to take legal action
against any
parties involved in any election
fraud and agreed to ask the education commissioner to order a new vote for the two board seats.
'' This is a monumental
fraud against our
party and every one that believes in open democratic process,» Oladapo said.
«Affiliates, partners, agents or other
parties;» law enforcement, civil litigants, and to «protect
against fraud.»
Also to avoid any accusations of inconsistency, it is my understanding that accusations of «
fraud» can be defamatory, but that it is virtually impossible for US «public figure» to demonstrate «actual malice» under US libel law and that libel judgements in Canada
against US
parties can not be enforced in the US.
The purpose of the statute of
frauds is to protect people from being held liable on informal communications because they may be made without sufficient consideration or expressed ambiguously or because such a communication might be fraudulently alleged
against the
party to be charged.
These include shareholder and partnership disputes; the investigation and pursuit of civil
fraud claims
against directors, employees and third
parties; international asset tracing; professional negligence claims (including
against office holders); Company law claims such as minority shareholder petitions (Section 994 Petitions) and specialist applications in relation to the conduct and control of companies; contract disputes; challenges to share sale consideration; and directors» disqualification proceedings.
Advising a fund on bringing
fraud proceedings
against former directors and third
parties, and enforcement of a foreign judgment in the UK.
Representing large pharmaceutical company in a consumer
fraud class action
against individuals and third -
party payers seeking damages in excess of $ 50 million.
We are experienced in all manner of civil claims based on dishonesty, including those based on misrepresentation or on accessory liability for a breach of fiduciary duty, both at the corporate and individual level; and in the various techniques of asset recovery, including tracing, the imposition of constructive trusts, claims
against third
parties who have participated in or received proceeds from the
fraud and piercing of the corporate veil.
Also, under the statute of
frauds, absent a writing and the signature of the
party against whom the contract will be enforced, a court can only enforce an oral agreement if part performance has been established.
The issue was whether the principle provided a defence to a claim brought by a company involved in a
fraud,
against a third
party, in respect of losses suffered as a result of the
fraud.
Indeed, the importance of this manual signing activity in conferring the significance of important legal actions is memorialized in a group of statutes collectively known as the «statute of
frauds» which says that certain kinds of legal acts are only legally effective if they are in writing and «signed» by the
party against whom the document will be enforced.
Advising a Kazakh oligarch and other
parties in respect of multi-billion pound
fraud claims
against them.
He has recently acted for an oil company in a claim to recover the proceeds of a substantial
fraud by its payroll officer, obtaining freezing orders and proprietary injunctions, tracing the funds into the hands of third
parties, obtaining judgments
against the laundering recipients and enforcing disclosure orders by committal for contempt, see SAIPEM Ltd v Stanley [2017] EWHC 2106.
According to a statement by Hailsham Chambers, whose Michael Pooles QC and Imran Benson acted for the respondent firm of solicitors, the ruling «draws residential conveyancing solicitors closer than ever before into the position of effectively guaranteeing their clients
against the possibility of
fraud by third
parties.
Additionally, Beasley Allen has successfully represented businesses
against other businesses in cases involving
fraud, as well as breach of contract, third -
party interference with contract, and disclosure of trade secrets.
Developed and wrote decision explaining ruling and informed interested
parties of results; participated in court proceedings
against claimants attempting to obtain benefits through
fraud.
Further, the court ruled that since the seller didn't seek damages, but rather wanted to rescind the sale, the seller had no basis to assert
fraud against the broker, who wasn't a
party to the purchase agreement.
While the Statute of
Frauds in many states bars oral agreements for real estate transactions, New Jersey's Statute of
Frauds does not bar oral agreements in real estate transactions if a
party can show either of the following: a sufficient identification of the property to be transferred, identification of the interest to be transferred, identification of the
parties to the transaction, and the existence of the agreement are established in a writing by or on behalf of the
party against whom enforcement is sought; or, a sufficient identification of the property to be transferred, identification of the interest to be transferred, identification of the
parties to the transaction, and the existence of the agreement proved by clear and convincing evidence.
He filed a lawsuit
against the former owner, the Listing Broker, and the Buyer's Representative alleging
fraud and negligent misrepresentation
against all the
parties, and breach of fiduciary duty allegations
against the Buyer's Representative.
Traditionally, the statute of
frauds requires a writing signed by the
party against whom enforcement is sought in the following circumstances: