Sentences with phrase «parties end the relationship»

Though both parties ended the relationship, the Water Authority sent Zeppelin Communications a letter saying only the authority had the right to terminate the contract and that it could see «any remedies available» because Zeppelin had breached its pact.

And after some time both parties end the relationship.

Not exact matches

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

And even if Benchmark's relationship with Uber frayed at the end, their collaboration still produced billions of dollars for both parties — a success by the standard metrics of Silicon Valley that shouldn't go unnoticed by the current crop of rising star founders.

The governor has had a rocky relationship with the WFP, and actively tried to neuter it (and other minor parties) earlier this year by proposing an end to the Wilson Pakula process, which would have robbed third party leaders of the power to control who gets their endorsement.

The grassroots left, powering Sen. Bernie Sanders» campaign, is ascendant, and the centrist Schumer has never had a very comfortable relationship with the most liberal end of the Democratic Party.

And since we are only one of two parties in any relationship, we can't always control whether they continue, or end.

In any type of relationship, the expectation that one party covers all dating expenses all the time may lead to resentment on both ends, unless such expectations...

Humans are wired to thrive on close interpersonal connections, so when a relationship and love life comes to an end, often at least one of the parties will hold hard feelings.

i recently ended a relationship because all she wanted was to party, and party hard.

It's the end of a relationship where they had a real connection and commitment to each other, so it's a real loss for both parties.

It is a material relationship that will end when the two parties are satisfied.

The end result of these arguments will satisfy all parties and you will be able to move on with the relationship without any resentment.

The relationship between the two parties could even be considered to be an open ended partnership, if the sugar momma and the sugar baby agree to these terms.

Suffice to say that they all have a problematic relationship with somebody in the wedding party, and that's how they ended up seated in a corner near a restroom.

Despite that we do not cherry pick books and we do not limit ourselves to already established authors C) We're sensible enough to realize that a win - win - win relationship / partnership where authors profit, where we profit, and where readers profit will benefit all parties much more than some arrangement where one party gets greedy and ends up losing its partners.

One of those connection things — someone that I met at a party at London Book Fair several years ago ended up on the film team for the KDP vids and thought of me when they decided to do something international... the power of relationships and personal connection!

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases in labor costs, possible increases in shipping rates or interruptions in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential separation of the Company's businesses, the risk that the transactions with Microsoft and Pearson do not achieve the expected benefits for the parties or impose costs on the Company in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion contemplated by the relationship with Microsoft, including that it is not successful or is delayed, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations under the Microsoft and Pearson commercial agreements and the consequences thereof, risks associated with the restatement contained in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness in internal controls described in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

Fred Olsen is the first supplier to end its relationship with Thomas Cook since Euler Hermes announced its plans to stop credit insurance cover for third - party suppliers one week ago.

As the three - hour extravaganza came to an end, guests and attendees mingled at the REZ:: LUMINES party, held in honor of Tetsuya Mizuguchi's special relationship with the city of Zurich, and DJs and VJs took over the wheel until the wee hours of the morning.

How might a cohabitation contract benefit the non-owner in the event that 1) the relationship ends disagreeably, and 2) the relationship continues but a lawsuit is filed against one or the other by a third party?

If people in this kind of a situation do not have a cohabitation agreement, there is not much in the way of legal means for these parties to split up stuff if their relationship should end.

The purpose of a closing letter is somewhat the same: so that both parties know when the lawyer - client relationship ends.

Often, parties consider these agreements when they are not sure that they will up being married and they want to establish terms that relate to property that they may be acquiring together and how that would be divided if the relationship ends.

Inevitably, one or both parties end up being hurt by the severance of an intimate relationship.

Still, this relationship must be properly defined in an independent contractor agreement or both parties may end up in costly disputes.

To this end, «a party to a civil case is entitled to have the jury qualified by the court as to any insurance carrier with a financial interest in the case,» Ford Motor Co. v. Conley, 294 Ga. 530, 550 (2014), for even when the insurer may not be a direct party to the action, a relationship with a non-party insurer with a pecuniary interest may sway a putative juror's vote.

The overarching theme behind the changes put forward for consideration by the Commission is the enablement of parties to a marriage or civil partnership to be treated as responsible adults, who can, not only determine how and when their marriage is to end, but also agree in advance, subject to certain safeguards, the financial provision which will be made for them on divorce or dissolution of their relationship.

Other times, a business relationship that has been fostered and developed for months — or even years — comes to a sudden, unexplained end, such as a «decision» by the other party to «go in a different direction».

As mediation requires the consent of both parties involved, it is substantially less conflict ridden, less costly, and a far more efficient way to settle the end of a relationship.

Also, both parties want to proceed with ending their relationship and agree to the Divorce itself.

Furthermore, if the adultery ended up being «condoned», i. e. the cheated - on party knew concerning the extra-marital sexual relationship but continued to stay in a marital, conjugal relationship because of their spouse, the adultery can not serve like a cause for divorce.

Vancouver Marriage Like Relationship Lawyers 604-602-9000 Vancouver Marriage Like Relationship lawyers deal with when and if parties entered into a «common law» or «marriage like relationship and when and Relationship Lawyers 604-602-9000 Vancouver Marriage Like Relationship lawyers deal with when and if parties entered into a «common law» or «marriage like relationship and when and Relationship lawyers deal with when and if parties entered into a «common law» or «marriage like relationship and when and relationship and when and if it ended.

Today, the standard for ending a marriage is not so high, which allows couples to end a relationship that is no longer working and gives the parties an opportunity to find happiness apart that they no longer found together.

-LSB-...] the consequences of a relationship ending badly have also resulted in legitimate claims of harassment where one of the parties to that relationship has, in some way, taken out their pain or frustration on their ex-significant other.

Lord Marks (Liberal Democrat) explained that the Bill proposes to address economic unfairness at the end of a relationship that has enriched one party and impoverished the other.

Divorce ends the marriage completely and will allow both parties to enter into intimate relationships and remarry, whereas separation does not allow this.

But according to the party, the relationship ended after it was determined the project was «not meeting» its priorities.

Instead, you may have a channel set up with a party you have an established relationship with, such as a payment provider like Coinbase, who (possibly through multiple degrees of separation) has a payment channel connection to the final end party.

It is understood and expected that the employment relationship we have agreed to is an «at will» relationship and it may be ended by either party at any time and for any reason.

Still, when an adult relationship ends badly, at least the wounded party knows from having weathered other disappointments that the all - too - familiar hollow feeling and veil of depression will inevitably lift.

«You are essentially obliged to denigrate the other parent, which I don't think is going to help the continuing relationship of two parties who, at the end of the legal case, are both parents to their children,» Robinson adds.

One party must simply testify that the marriage has become «insupportable because of discord or conflict of personalities that destroys the legitimate ends of the marital relationship and prevents any reasonable expectation of reconciliation.»

Because of the dominance of a litigation model in native title negotiations, the relationship between the State and the native title claim group begins with the filing of a native title claim and tends to end with the resolution of that claim either through litigation or by agreement of the parties.

Personally, I believe the difference between a relationship rut and a dead - end relationship is whether one or both parties do not want to put in the time to repair any issues.

First off, her boyfriend at the time told her he liked her best friend, secondly she was entering college where she would be introduced to a completely new world since she had lived in the same small town her entire life, another factor is that her boyfriend did not pay attention to her or show any sign of affection, and lastly she cheated on a night when she was at a party with a friend who ended up dating her after she ended the relationship.

You can protect your co-parenting relationship and end up with more property if you divide everything the way a neutral 3rd party (mediator) suggests.

If you must have an ongoing relationship with the other party after the divorce, the more you can preserve your relationship through the divorce process, the better off you will be at the end.

One party in the relationship may constantly waver between wanting to stay with their partner, or end the relationship.

We also know that divorces are rarely the end of the relationship in the sense that once they are final you never have, or need to have, contact with the other party again.