«pick your three prefered
parties in order of preference (1 most, 3 least).
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability
of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost
of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates
of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates
of changing customer
preferences for business aircraft, including the effect
of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result
of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect
of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution
of key milestones such as the receipt
of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third
party approvals for the consummation
of our announced acquisition
of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability
of all
parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk
of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production
of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced
orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts
of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak
of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact
of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition
of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect
of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect
of changes
in tax law, such as the effect
of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations
of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect
of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability
of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass
of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many
of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment
of interest on, and principal
of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness
of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact
of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition
of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result
of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks
of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions
of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
there is no candidate lower
in the
order of preference on the
party list than the member
of Parliament whose seat has been declared vacant, --
From the 1984 election, group ticket voting was introduced
in order to reduce a high rate
of informal voting but
in 2016, group tickets were abolished to avoid undue influence
of preference deals amongst
parties that were seen as distorting election results [22] and a form
of optional preferential voting was introduced.
In order to address the question, I estimate what the party first preference votes would be in the different constituencies, assuming similar (proportional) changes in party vote shares in all constituencies to those that are being suggested by a particular opinion poll, or — in this case — an average of the most recent poll
In order to address the question, I estimate what the
party first
preference votes would be
in the different constituencies, assuming similar (proportional) changes in party vote shares in all constituencies to those that are being suggested by a particular opinion poll, or — in this case — an average of the most recent poll
in the different constituencies, assuming similar (proportional) changes
in party vote shares in all constituencies to those that are being suggested by a particular opinion poll, or — in this case — an average of the most recent poll
in party vote shares
in all constituencies to those that are being suggested by a particular opinion poll, or — in this case — an average of the most recent poll
in all constituencies to those that are being suggested by a particular opinion poll, or —
in this case — an average of the most recent poll
in this case — an average
of the most recent polls.
Labour's electoral «college» is split into three sections — MPs and euro MPs, union - affiliated members and ordinary
party members, all
of whom can vote for more than one candidate
in an
order of preference.
From the 1984 election, group ticket voting was introduced,
in order to reduce a high rate
of informal voting that arose from the requirement that each candidate be given a
preference, and to allow small
parties and independent candidates a reasonable chance
of winning a seat.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs
of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition
of the parents to understand and meet the needs
of the child; (3) the
preferences of each child; (4) the wishes
of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship
of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest
of the child; (6) the actions
of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court
orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior
of the parents
in an effort to involve the child
in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent
in front
of the child; (9) the ability
of each parent to be actively involved
in the life
of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability
of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health
of all individuals involved, except that a disability
of a proposed custodial parent or other
party,
in and
of itself, must not be determinative
of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not
in the best interest
of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling
of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child
of the actions
of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence
in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.
In making the appointment, the appointing authority shall use the following list - procedure, unless the parties agree that the list - procedure should not be used or unless the appointing authority determines in its discretion that the use of the list - procedure is not appropriate for the case: (a) The appointing authority shall communicate to each of the parties an identical list containing at least three names; (b) Within 15 days after the receipt of this list, or such other period as may be set by the Secretariat, each party may return the list to the appointing authority, without copying the other party, after having deleted the name or names to which it objects and numbered the remaining names on the list in the order of its preference; (c) After the expiration of the above period of time the appointing authority shall appoint the sole arbitrator from among the names approved on the lists returned to it and in accordance with the order of preference indicated by the parties; (d) If for any reason the appointment can not be made according to this procedure, the appointing authority may exercise its discretion in appointing the sole arbitrato
In making the appointment, the appointing authority shall use the following list - procedure, unless the
parties agree that the list - procedure should not be used or unless the appointing authority determines
in its discretion that the use of the list - procedure is not appropriate for the case: (a) The appointing authority shall communicate to each of the parties an identical list containing at least three names; (b) Within 15 days after the receipt of this list, or such other period as may be set by the Secretariat, each party may return the list to the appointing authority, without copying the other party, after having deleted the name or names to which it objects and numbered the remaining names on the list in the order of its preference; (c) After the expiration of the above period of time the appointing authority shall appoint the sole arbitrator from among the names approved on the lists returned to it and in accordance with the order of preference indicated by the parties; (d) If for any reason the appointment can not be made according to this procedure, the appointing authority may exercise its discretion in appointing the sole arbitrato
in its discretion that the use
of the list - procedure is not appropriate for the case: (a) The appointing authority shall communicate to each
of the
parties an identical list containing at least three names; (b) Within 15 days after the receipt
of this list, or such other period as may be set by the Secretariat, each
party may return the list to the appointing authority, without copying the other
party, after having deleted the name or names to which it objects and numbered the remaining names on the list
in the order of its preference; (c) After the expiration of the above period of time the appointing authority shall appoint the sole arbitrator from among the names approved on the lists returned to it and in accordance with the order of preference indicated by the parties; (d) If for any reason the appointment can not be made according to this procedure, the appointing authority may exercise its discretion in appointing the sole arbitrato
in the
order of its
preference; (c) After the expiration
of the above period
of time the appointing authority shall appoint the sole arbitrator from among the names approved on the lists returned to it and
in accordance with the order of preference indicated by the parties; (d) If for any reason the appointment can not be made according to this procedure, the appointing authority may exercise its discretion in appointing the sole arbitrato
in accordance with the
order of preference indicated by the
parties; (d) If for any reason the appointment can not be made according to this procedure, the appointing authority may exercise its discretion
in appointing the sole arbitrato
in appointing the sole arbitrator.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs
of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition
of the parents to understand and meet the needs
of the child; (3) the
preferences of each child; (4) the wishes
of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship
of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest
of the child; (6) the actions
of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court
orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior
of the parents
in an effort to involve the child
in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent
in front
of the child; (9) the ability
of each parent to be actively involved
in the life
of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability
of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health
of all individuals involved, except that a disability
of a proposed custodial parent or other
party,
in and
of itself, must not be determinative
of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not
in the best interest
of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling
of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child
of the actions
of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence
in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary