Sentences with phrase «parties in question»

This is to ensure that the third party in question will be able to make a profit from the purchase upon the policy holder's death.
YouGov were close behind, but got the balance of support amongst the smaller parties wrong, overestimating the level of support for the Greens — this is perhaps the result of switching to including all the minor parties in their question prompt for their last few polls.
Refer to third parties in your questions by names, not pronouns.
Often that resolution can be difficult, particularly when the parties in question simply do not get along or are strong in their conviction.
We feel very lucky that the party in question escaped with his (or her) toes intact; meanwhile, the escalator at this writing is still jammed.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
«The Council calls on the supporters of the parties in question to exercise caution and circumspection, as they embark on their legitimate rights to promote the virtues of their parties.
If the party in question wins a majority (so that the unelected leader would ordinarily become PM), is there any protocol that determines how a Prime Minister would be chosen under these circumstances?
Party leader ratings reflect two categories of respondents — supporters of the party in question and those who have no allegiance to that party.
You can't «force» anyone to cast a vote unless they support the person or party in question.
And the social bases of the two parties in question are totally different - there's some overlap, but less than is commonly assumed.
Your wikipedia quote is talking about a numbered sequence of relatively stable two party systems in the USA over various historical periods, which differ from each other as to the identities of the two parties in question.
Mr Brady is far from alone in his party in questioning the move away from academic selection, with the former grammar school pupil calling for an increase in grammar schools in inner cities.
The party in question is called the Polish Law and Justice party.
Ties to Party in Question
That being said, the inquiry into misconduct should proceed according to the standard policies at the researchers» institution, with the media being notified only if the parties in question are indeed deemed guilty of research fraud.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
The party in question is a small, select soiree held in a book - lined London townhouse owned by Janet, a politician played by Kristin Scott Thomas, and her academic classicist husband Bill (Timothy Spall).
At the party in question, 33 - year - old David is accosted by his friend with benefits, Julie Gianni (Cameron Diaz), who isn't happy to not have been invited.
There are definitive rules for how hell works — where the party in question would have ended up based on his or her sins; how Heck can communicate with his client while way - down - under, how different areas of hell and its denizens can be circumnavigated.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
If however the legal claim is valid then it behooves the consumer to contact the party in question and resolve the matter to prevent a lawsuit from being filed.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
The parties in question include corporations and political entities like US states and cities, perhaps even NGOs like Greenpeace.
The party in question is called Rise Up Australia and its messianic front man, Pastor Danny Nalliah, believes that only God can control the climate and that Victoria's 2009 Black Saturday bushfires, which killed more than 170 people, were God's punishment for Victoria's laws allowing abortion.
The dichotomy that Oreskes asks us to consider is not which argument is more sound, but which is safer, given the honesty of the parties in question.
The parties in question were married for more than 24 years, and separated in 1990.
The parties in question began to live together in 1997.
You must be able to prove, for example, that the defendant either knew or should have known about the condition of the food, and that the party in question was liable for the resulting illness.
It is always difficult to ascertain intention when the intention of the party in question is difficult ascertain because they are dead.
1) Using envelopes in all cases of service when a statement of claim is not being handed directly to the party in question
But for now, for the ones left behind, and for the ones who were not even on the balcony or at the party in question, how do they move on with their lives after this horrific tragedy?
As a result, there has been a degree of distrust even when Bitcoin Core does take unified action to speak, with many assuming the self - interest of the parties in question.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
** Remember, the agent is not allowed to tell the seller that the buyer will offer more or tell the buyer that the seller will take less without permission from the party in question.
That means he is not allowed to tell the seller that the buyer will offer more or tell the buyer that the seller will take less without permission from the party in question.
That means the agent is not allowed to tell the seller that the buyer will pay more for the property or tell the buyer that the seller will take less for the property without permission from the party in question.
That means that the transaction broker can not tell the buyer that the seller would really agree to a lower price, or the selling that the buyer would go higher, without the expressed permission of the party in questions.
Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z