However, this ability is dependent upon the parameters set forth by
the parties in the separation agreement.
Not exact matches
«
In general, if there's a separation agreement or a settlement agreement, a case is considered to be settled with respect to the parties that entered into that agreement,» said Wicka, a partner in the Tarantino Law Fir
In general, if there's a
separation agreement or a settlement
agreement, a case is considered to be settled with respect to the
parties that entered into that
agreement,» said Wicka, a partner
in the Tarantino Law Fir
in the Tarantino Law Firm.
In a statement they said «In an effort to optimize the structure of the separation, the Company has been exploring various options and is in discussions with its NOOK Media partners to potentially restructure existing agreements; and with potential third - party partner
In a statement they said «
In an effort to optimize the structure of the separation, the Company has been exploring various options and is in discussions with its NOOK Media partners to potentially restructure existing agreements; and with potential third - party partner
In an effort to optimize the structure of the
separation, the Company has been exploring various options and is
in discussions with its NOOK Media partners to potentially restructure existing agreements; and with potential third - party partner
in discussions with its NOOK Media partners to potentially restructure existing
agreements; and with potential third -
party partners.
Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions
in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases
in labor costs, possible increases
in shipping rates or interruptions
in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory
in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes
in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction
in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized
in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases
in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential
separation of the Company's businesses, the risk that the transactions with Microsoft and Pearson do not achieve the expected benefits for the
parties or impose costs on the Company
in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion contemplated by the relationship with Microsoft, including that it is not successful or is delayed, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations under the Microsoft and Pearson commercial
agreements and the consequences thereof, risks associated with the restatement contained
in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness
in internal controls described
in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed
in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed
in detail
in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,»
in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, and
in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.
Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the effect of the proposed
separation of NOOK Media, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions
in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases
in labor costs, possible increases
in shipping rates or interruptions
in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory
in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes
in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction
in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized
in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases
in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, risks associated with the commercial
agreement with Samsung, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential
separation of the Company's businesses (including with respect to the timing of the completion thereof), the risk that the transactions with Pearson and Samsung do not achieve the expected benefits for the
parties or impose costs on the Company
in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion previously undertaken, including any risks associated with a reduction of international operations following termination of the Microsoft commercial
agreement, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations under the Pearson and Samsung commercial
agreements and the consequences thereof, the risks associated with the termination of Microsoft commercial
agreement, including potential customer losses, risks associated with the restatement contained
in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness
in internal controls described
in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed
in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed
in detail
in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,»
in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2014, and
in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.
Funds
in RRSPs may be rolled over tax - free to ex-spouses if the
parties are living apart and payments follow a written
separation agreement, court order, decree or judgment.
For instance, a
separation agreement may prevent a
party from being able to move money between accounts
in order to protect the rights of the other
party.
Rick v Brandsema is a BC family law case
in which the
parties entered a
separation agreement that left Mr. Brandsema with substantially more assets than Ms. Rick after 27 years of marriage.
For example, if the
parties execute a
separation agreement that resolves the manner
in which certain financial assets will be divided, this matter will not need to be resolved during the divorce process.
This resolution can provide a sense of security to both
parties, allowing them to plan for their respective futures
in the midst of a very difficult time
in their lives, and an experienced Fairfax
separation agreement attorney will be able to help to mitigate the pressures of this time.
In the written separation agreement, he agreed to pay his wife $ 40,000 in sixteen monthly installments of $ 2,500 and the parties waived each's right to spousal suppor
In the written
separation agreement, he agreed to pay his wife $ 40,000
in sixteen monthly installments of $ 2,500 and the parties waived each's right to spousal suppor
in sixteen monthly installments of $ 2,500 and the
parties waived each's right to spousal support.
There are programs that the Income Tax Act and Pension Benefits Act have
in place to allow tax - free rollovers of RRSPs, RRIFs, and pensions where there is a court order or written
separation agreement between the
parties.
While Virginia does not require that
separation agreements be
in writing, it is wise to capture the agreed - upon terms
in a written document signed by both
parties so that there are no later disputes about what was agreed upon initially.
A
separation agreement can encompass as much or as little as the
parties agree to, but the various possibilities include an
agreement that the
parties are separating by consent and a defining of each
party's respective rights as to the division of their assets and liabilities, as well as
in the event of a spouse's death.
The mortgage lender insisted that the plaintiff produce a signed
separation agreement, providing, among other things, that neither
party would claim support from the other, and that the plaintiff would receive $ 87,000 for her equity
in the matrimonial home.
Separation agreements can also be useful because the more issues that are resolved by way of
agreement between the
parties, the less there is to fight about
in court
in the divorce case.
With regards to these types of
agreements, a Leesburg
separation agreement attorney is useful
in terms of explaining to a
party contemplating a
separation agreement what their rights would be, should the divorce case be litigated
in the courts.
It's possible to draft and sign an
agreement that guides the actions of both
parties, never submit it to the court, and live
in a permanent state of
separation.
[3]
In addition to the volatile issues of custody and access, this application raises a question as to whether grounds exist to set aside the
separation agreement of the
parties.
After the
parties»
separation July 2000, they entered into an
agreement in August 2000 providing for joint custody and for Mr. Trignani to pay maintenance.
In In re Marriage of Iqbal & Khan, 2014 IL App (2d) 131306, 11 N.E. 3d 1, the two
parties, of the Islamic faith, signed a
separation agreement («PNA»).
The
parties and their attorneys articulate the underlying goals and interests of the divorcing
parties and strive to reach those goals
in order to create a fair and reasonable
separation agreement.
Most likely the next document drawn up
in a case will be a proposed
separation agreement — an indication that the
parties wish to settle their dispute.
In Doucet v. Doucet, a 2016 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Court concluded that the spousal and child support provisions of the
parties»
separation agreement were unenforceable.
If a divorce is imminent, i.e., the
parties enter into a Postnuptial
agreement in anticipation of divorce, then the contract is called a Separation Agreement or Settlement A
agreement in anticipation of divorce, then the contract is called a
Separation Agreement or Settlement A
Agreement or Settlement
AgreementAgreement.
In uncontested divorces, the
parties agree to all matters, and present an executed
separation agreement to the court for approval.
In addition, on application by either spouse, the court will make an order for support that mirrors the Child Support Guidelines, regardless of what the parties previously agreed to in their separation agreement, unless special provisions have been made for the child support which are in the best interests of the child, and the court agrees that the special provisions are in the best interests of the chil
In addition, on application by either spouse, the court will make an order for support that mirrors the Child Support Guidelines, regardless of what the
parties previously agreed to
in their separation agreement, unless special provisions have been made for the child support which are in the best interests of the child, and the court agrees that the special provisions are in the best interests of the chil
in their
separation agreement, unless special provisions have been made for the child support which are
in the best interests of the child, and the court agrees that the special provisions are in the best interests of the chil
in the best interests of the child, and the court agrees that the special provisions are
in the best interests of the chil
in the best interests of the child.
This was because (1) the
parties» entire marriage and
separation took place
in Germany; (2) the decedent continued to live with their minor child
in Germany until her death; (3) the
separation agreement was executed
in Germany; (4) every connection between the
parties concerning their marriage arose
in Germany; and (5) the German nexus had already prevented Jurgen Salathe from obtaining a Florida divorce from the decedent
in Florida.
In contested divorces, the
parties are adversarial, they can not agree to a
separation agreement.
This means that all but 10 % of family cases are settled between the
parties, whether by
separation agreement or by embodying the
agreement in a divorce order with «consented to corollary relief.»
In re Marriage of Thornton, No. 149529 (California Court of Appeals, Second District, January 16, 2002): The
separation agreement of the
parties, incorporated into the judgment of divorce, provided that the husband shall pay alimony until the death of either
party, or until March 2003.
If this is not possible, the
parties should include provisions
in a
separation agreement that detail the responsibility of each spouse for joint debt and the appropriate course of action if a spouse fails to fulfill payment obligations.
Through a menu of services a self - rep can obtain — at a price fixed
in advance — a variety of services: Answer Me This (a single email question and answer), Put a Lawyer
in Your Pocket (talk to a lawyer for 15 minutes at a time), Pay for an Hour — Get a Month (an unlimited — within reason — number of emails with an experienced family law lawyer), Your Own Court (an early, neutral, evaluation service to give you the strengths and weaknesses of your case and the other
party's case, available to one or both
parties) Document Preparation (have a lawyer prepare your documents for you), and a Straightforward
Separation Agreement (get the agreement you want without going to a lawyer's
Agreement (get the
agreement you want without going to a lawyer's
agreement you want without going to a lawyer's office).
In comparison, parties in mediation craft a separation agreement that is customized to their unique circumstances, needs, and concern
In comparison,
parties in mediation craft a separation agreement that is customized to their unique circumstances, needs, and concern
in mediation craft a
separation agreement that is customized to their unique circumstances, needs, and concerns.
Given that the mother was no longer a stay - at - home spouse and had nearly acquired the status of autonomy — which was again a change
in circumstances, as defined by the
parties»
separation agreement — the court fixed the father's spousal support obligation
in a declining fashion, so as to allow the mother to attain her full autonomy within the next five years.
The
parties may also agree
in a
separation agreement that the tax deduction and the taxable income aspects of alimony law shall not apply.
Under both federal and state income tax rules, alimony will be deductible by the payor spouse, and is taxable to the receiving spouse, provided that: (1) the payments are
in cash and not
in kind; (2) the payments are made incident to divorce or to a
separation agreement; (3) the
parties have not designated the payments as non-alimony; (4) the
parties are not living
in the same household; and (5) the payor has no liability for payment after the death of the payee spouse.
In December 2010, the
parties entered into a
separation agreement, which was drafted by accountants (not lawyers).
The
agreement provided, inter alia, that each
party waived the right to the other's separate property
in the event of
separation or divorce; each
party would keep separate bank accounts; and the husband's maintenance obligation would be limited to a lump sum payment of $ 20,000.
It order to have a valid
Separation Agreement, the
Agreement must be
in writing, signed by the
parties and witnessed by a third
party.
Furthermore,
in order to solidify the terms of your
Separation Agreement, so that it will be difficult for either
party to challenge the
Agreement in the future, it is highly recommended by both
parties have independent legal advice prior to signing the
Agreement.
If support is decided outside the court
in a
Separation Agreement then a
Separation Agreement can include whatever payment terms the
parties agree upon.
Other necessary provisions can be included
in or excluded by a family law attorney
in Fairfax from the
separation agreement as the
parties see fit.
The
parties signed a
Separation Agreement settling all outstanding financial issues between them
in July 2017.
If
parties are negotiating and not
in court, custody is formalized through a written
agreement, like a parenting
agreement or
separation agreement.
The judge will «find» that the divorce is irretrievably broken and that the
Separation Agreement was entered into by both
parties and not a product of duress or coercion The judge will «find» that the
Separation Agreement is fair and reasonable
in light of the circumstances.
The essence of this inquiry is whether the circumstances of the
parties at the time of
separation were within the reasonable contemplation of the
parties at the time the
agreement was formed, and, if so, whether at that time the
parties made adequate arrangements
in response to these anticipated circumstances...
It is of course physically possible for you to draft your own
separation agreement, but without lawyers to represent each
party and explain to them their rights, risks and obligations, a judge will not be able to ensure the circumstances under which the
agreement was signed were appropriate and therefore will probably not enforce the
agreement if it was challenged
in the courts.
Often when
parties separate, they include a clause
in their
separation agreement that says spousal support can end or be reviewed when there is a «material change of circumstances».
In Toscano v Toscano, the court explained that where there are «any circumstances of oppression, pressure, or other vulnerabilities, and if one party's exploitation of such vulnerabilities during the negotiation process resulted in a separation agreement that deviated substantially from the legislation», the agreement may be set asid
In Toscano v Toscano, the court explained that where there are «any circumstances of oppression, pressure, or other vulnerabilities, and if one
party's exploitation of such vulnerabilities during the negotiation process resulted
in a separation agreement that deviated substantially from the legislation», the agreement may be set asid
in a
separation agreement that deviated substantially from the legislation», the
agreement may be set aside.