The parties to the transactions agreed that before the acquisition, the seller would «package» the depreciable real properties by rolling them into limited partnerships pursuant to subsection 97 (2).
No more, no less, unless
the parties to the transaction agree otherwise.
No more, no less, unless
all parties to the transaction agree otherwise.
No more, no less, unless
the parties to the transaction agree otherwise» I believe my said statement clearly and fairly outlines how dual agency should be handled.
Not exact matches
P2P exchanges, such as Cointal, connect buyers and sellers
to interact directly, relying on both
parties to agree to any given
transaction.
(b)
to ensure transparency and certainty in commercial
transactions in the grocery supply chain and
to minimise disputes arising from a lack of certainty in respect of the commercial terms
agreed between
parties; and
You expressly acknowledge and
agree that the National Education Union shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or exemplary damages, including but not limited
to, damages for loss of profits, goodwill, use, data or other intangible losses (even if the National Education Union has been advised of the possibility of such damages), resulting from: (i) the use or the inability
to use the service; (ii) the cost of procurement of substitute goods and services resulting from any goods, data, information or services purchased or obtained or messages received or
transactions entered into through or from the service; (iii) unauthorized access
to or alteration of your transmissions or data; (iv) statements or conduct of any third
party on the service; or (v) any other matter relating
to the service.
- All
parties agree in relation
to any
transaction involving this vehicle that proper venue for any legal proceedings shall be in Leavenworth County, Kansas.
According
to legal guidelines, the method of payment has
to be mutually
agreed upon by the
parties involved with the
transactions.
The draft agreement prepared on behalf of Avigen and submitted
to BVF on March 24, 2009 provided that if the
parties agreed on a strategic
transaction, BVF would sign a tender and / or voting agreement in favor of the
transaction recommended by the Board and presented
to stockholders for approval.
A deal is made by
agreeing to the financial terms and simply saying ok, I will buy a work at a given level and then boom, the
transaction is complete on a handshake (sometimes not even), invoicing
to follow, as old a way of doing business as business is old, entailing a nice leap of faith based purely on trust (by both
parties) in the process.
While commercial
parties may turn
to arbitration as the choice dispute resolution mechanism in its
transaction document,
parties are advised
to be alive
to the fact that by adopting certain institutional arbitration rules within the arbitration agreement and conducting the arbitration under the auspices of those institutions, they will be taken
to have
agreed to waive their right
to recourse against the award by way of appeal on a question of law in the context of domestic arbitrations.
The Receiving
Party agrees to use the Confidential Information solely in connection with evaluating or negotiating the
Transaction, and not for any other purpose.
In this case, the
parties agreed to obtain court approval of the
transaction involving the purchase of the licence and copyrights in tax publications by exceptionally applying
to the court for a vesting order.
It was said this might be accomplished by the preparation of alternative clauses or provisions under which
parties to a
transaction could
agree to the use of the ODR Rules, with different clauses providing for the application of a different «track».
Both
parties have
agreed to not disclose the financial terms and further details of the
transaction.
The best examples are provided by the developments within what I call «go - ing
transaction adjustments», i.e., cases where the
parties agree that the terms of the original contract are
to be changed in the midst of performance, and cases on the third
party beneficiary rule where no consistent attempt was made
to fit the cases together in spite of the fact that there was, supposedly, a very clear rule.
«The Rules shall apply where the
parties to a sales or service contract concluded using electronic communications have, at the time of a
transaction, explicitly
agreed that disputes relating
to that
transaction and falling within the scope of the Rules shall be resolved under the Rules.»
We can't eat a digital coin just as much as we can't light a pile of one dollar bills on fire
to drive our car down the road, and because it's an ethereal, yet widely -
agreed upon method of payment between two
parties, there's no reason why a third -
party company wouldn't be able
to stand in as a trustworthy signatory in between
transactions.
To set up a bidirectional payment channel, both
parties involved must first
agree on an opening
transaction.
In one example, a registrant may wish
to include a Bitcoin address, so that this address may be retrieved during a
transaction when both
parties agree to use Bitcoins as the currency.
The smart contracts governing the
transactions of the TEU tokens are coded with a set of immutable conditions, and neither of the
parties will be able
to alter what has been
agreed upon.
The court
agreed with this argument, finding that the failure of the
parties to extend the financing contingency caused the
transaction to collapse, not the failure
to send the Amendment
to the Lender.
It requires no particular technology, but requires all
parties to the
transaction to agree on the method for electronically «authenticating» the contracts or documents.
If the
transaction is cancelled by either
party, the agent holding the escrow monies shouldn't disburse any funds until all
parties agree in writing how
to disburse them.
A completed
transaction is not a prerequisite
to recovering a commission in Maine, unless the
parties have
agreed otherwise.
It can be sold for more or less as long as all
parties involved
to such a
transaction is made fully aware of what is taking place and they
agree in writing
to go along with such
transaction.
In this scenario, where two agency relationships have already been established, the recommendation of the ATF is that the licensee would advise both the seller and the buyer that he / she is already acting as an agent for both
parties, although not yet with respect
to this specific property, and explain the possibility of both
parties agreeing that the licensee be allowed
to act as a
transaction facilitator.
In my opinion, unless an agent is a
party to the
transaction (meaning buyer or seller), an agent should never give up pay for their services, unless it was never
agreed upon from the get go.
A Missouri court has considered whether a broker could collect a commission from a commercial lease
transaction when the
parties had
agreed to a lease but had not fixed the monthly base rent.
Escrow Refers
to a neutral third
party assigned
to handle all the paperwork of settlement or closing of the
transaction, according
to the terms
agreed by the buyer and the seller.
Abrams Realty Corp. v. Elo (279 A.D. 2d 261)- trial evidence establishes that broker was the procuring cause of sale of property; brokerage agreement was not unenforceable for its failure
to specify rate at which broker's commission would be computed since it was clear that broker did not
agree to work without compensation and that the
parties understood that the broker would be compensated at the prevailing, normal and accepted rates; trial court properly rejected attempt
to evade obligation
to pay broker's commission by endeavoring
to characterize the
transaction as merely the assignment of a successful bid
M.A. Salazar, Inc. v. Levy (237 A.D. 2d 583)- summary judgment granted dismissing broker's complaint for brokerage commission; broker fails
to allege that the
parties agreed on terms customarily encountered in a real estate
transaction and in the absence of such agreement on essential terms, the broker did not earn commission; mere agreement as
to price on a proposed sale does not constitute a meeting of the minds of buyer and seller and therefore broker is not procuring cause.
The
Parties agree that this representation and warranty shall form an integral part of this Agreement and survive the completion of this
transaction, but apply only
to the state of the property existing at completion of this
transaction.
We produce all of the necessary documentation required
to bind
parties to the
agreed terms of the
transaction, and oversee the process from start
to finish.
The burden of proof that the
transaction was a righteous one rests upon the agent, who is bound
to produce clear affirmative proof that the
parties were at arm's length, that the principal had the fullest information upon all material facts, and that having this information he
agreed to adopt what was done.»
The deposit
to be disclosed under § 1026.37 (h)(1)(iv)(A) is any amount that the consumer has
agreed to pay
to a
party identified in the real estate purchase and sale agreement
to be held until consummation of the
transaction, which is often referred
to as an earnest money deposit.