Sentences with phrase «parties under the protocol»

Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol address reporting and review of information by Annex I Parties under the Protocol, as well as national systems and methodologies for the preparation of greenhouse gas inventories.

Provides information on the content and origin of the provisions of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the legal obligations of the parties under the Protocol.

Not exact matches

Sellers may supply non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment methyl bromide to a person who has a current critical use exemption approved by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol (an exempt person) only if the seller is listed as the nominated supplier for that exemption holder on the current non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment Exemption List (and, if also required, the non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment Intermediate Supplier List - see below) under the Regulations.

Under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, methyl bromide can only be used for a non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment application if a critical use exemption has been approved by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol.

To address the shortage of oats grown under a purity protocol, I would answer that with a question... If General Mills could purchase 3rd party certified gluten - free oats from the farm, would they buy them if the volume needed was available?

If the party in question wins a majority (so that the unelected leader would ordinarily become PM), is there any protocol that determines how a Prime Minister would be chosen under these circumstances?

Countries that are party to the 1997 Kyoto protocol will continue to discuss a post-2012 commitment period; negotiators on a second track that includes the United States, which is not party to Kyoto, will continue under the main UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Thanks to a «quantum ATM» system under development at HP Labs in Bristol, UK, this is now all it will take for two parties to share a secret string of bits via a quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol.

In Durban, the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) was established to develop a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention, applicable to all Parties.

Reporting is done by Parties by submitting annual emission inventories and national reports under the Protocol at regular intervals.

In January 2013, a joint German - South African inspection of Princess Elisabeth Antarctica [5], under the Antarctic Treaty and Protocol on Environmental Protection, commended to all Parties to the Treaty the station's energy and waste management systems, and commented on the «excellent science is undertaken by internationally staffed expeditions that do field work» around the station.

The purpose of the ADP in the next week is to consolidate a document that the parties can adopt, as a protocol or other legal instrument, under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Annual report on the technical review of greenhouse gas inventories and other information reported by Parties included in Annex I to the Convention that are also Parties to the Kyoto Protocol under Article 7, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto Protocol

These include a 2nd commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (KP), and comparable mitigation actions by developed countries for non-KP parties under the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action (AWG - LCA) and Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) from developing countries with support from means of implementation, these are finance and technology transfer.

Countries that are not Parties to the Kyoto Protocol are not eligible to participate in emissions trading under it.

Phase 2 KP - Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex 1 Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG - KP).

The Climate Change Conference of Parties under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol was held in Lima (Peru) this year.

The mandate of the ADP is to develop a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties, which is to be completed no later than 2015 in order for it to be adopted at the twenty - first session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) and for it to come into effect and be implemented from 2020.

Parties further requested the ADP to intensify its work, with a view to making available a negotiating text for a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties before May 2015.

Voluntary submission of supplementary information under Article 7, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto Protocol by Annex I Kyoto Protocol Parties is reflected in the last column of the table below.

Through the same decision, Parties requested the secretariat to communicate the negotiating text to Parties in accordance with provisions of the Convention and the applied rules of procedure, while noting that such communication will not prejudice whether the outcome will be a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties.

This technical document synthesizes the information provided by Parties and relevant organizations on the revision of the joint implementation (JI) guidelines, taking into consideration their experience of implementing the flexible mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol and the recommendations on options for building on the approach embodied in JI.

The exact language is a feat of amazing creative ambiguity: the ADP is meant to conclude with «a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties.»

The exact language in the decision (1 / CP.17) which mandated these talks is a feat of creative ambiguity: the ADP is meant to conclude with «a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties.»

In the morning, the opening plenary of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG - KP) took place.

At climate negotiations at COP - 13 in Bali, Indonesia in 2007, parties to the UNFCCC agreed to replace the Kyoto Protocol with an agreement that would create a second commitment period under the UNFCCC and would include binding emissions reductions for developed countries and new programs on adaptation for developing countries, deforestation, finance, technology transfer, and capacity building.

-- If the United States becomes a party or otherwise adheres to a multilateral agreement, including any amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, which restricts the production or consumption of class II, group II substances, the Administrator may utilize funds to meet any related contribution obligation of the United States to the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal Protocol or similar multilateral fund established under such multilateral agreement.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, Parties shall annually report emissions by sources and removals by sinks of CO2 and other greenhouse gases resulting from:

Unlike the Convention, which includes all emissions and removals from LULUCF in a Party total emissions, the Kyoto Protocol restricts the accounting of the LULUCF sector to emissions and removals from specific activities that are defined under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Protocol.

During these COPs Parties finalized the remaining work of the guidelines under Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol.

For the first commitment period decision 15 / CMP.1 Guidelines for the preparation of the information required under Article 7 of the Kyoto Protocol stipulates that each Party included in Annex I shall include in its annual greenhouse gas inventory information on anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from land use, land - use change and forestry activities under Article 3, paragraph 3, and, if any, elected activities under Article 3, paragraph 4, in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 2, as elaborated by any good practice guidance in accordance with relevant decisions of the COP / MOP on land use, land - use change and forestry.

Parties also have to report annually, supplementary information related to LULUCF under the provisions of the Kyoto Protocol and the Marrakesh Accords to ensure compliance with their commitments.

Moreover, data reported by Annex B Parties under the Kyoto Protocol for the first commitment period as of 17 February 2015 are accessible through the links below:

In a nutshell, parties «decided to launch a process to develop a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties» to be agreed on by all parties in 2015 and come into force bparties «decided to launch a process to develop a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties» to be agreed on by all parties in 2015 and come into force bParties» to be agreed on by all parties in 2015 and come into force bparties in 2015 and come into force by 2020.

In addition, for those parties who are not party to the Kyoto Protocol or would not abide by that treaty, also have a responsibility to ensure comparability of their targets and actions under the AWG - LCA.

With a view to ensure that mitigation ambition under the DP is closely linked to work of parties under the two other groups - namely LCA and KP, we would like to propose the inclusion of the following footnote in the agenda: The implementation of Decision 1 / CP.17 should be examined on the basis of its compliance with International Law, in accordance with the principle of pacta sunt servanda and, in particular, with the exception on non-performance related to the full respect and compliance with the UNFCCC and its Kyoto Protocol, for the Parties that are Parties of those instrparties under the two other groups - namely LCA and KP, we would like to propose the inclusion of the following footnote in the agenda: The implementation of Decision 1 / CP.17 should be examined on the basis of its compliance with International Law, in accordance with the principle of pacta sunt servanda and, in particular, with the exception on non-performance related to the full respect and compliance with the UNFCCC and its Kyoto Protocol, for the Parties that are Parties of those instrParties that are Parties of those instrParties of those instruments.

For a while now, the EU has been busy pushing a COP decision at Warsaw that will urge Parties to begin this exact same process under the Montreal Protocol, and they are clearly excited to have China and the US in agreement.

UNFCCC data under the Kyoto Protocol in individual Annex I Parties that are Parties to the Kyoto Protocol

At the COP - 13 negotiations in Bali, Indonesia in 2007, parties to the UNFCCC agreed to replace the Kyoto Protocol with an agreement that would create a second commitment period under the UNFCCC and would include binding emissions reductions for developed countries and new programs on adaptation for developing countries, deforestation, finance, technology transfer, and capacity building.

«The introduction of environmentally friendly solutions will allow the Parties to comply with the downstream obligations under the Montreal Protocol.»

In accordance with Kyoto Protocol requirements, Parties launched negotiations on the next phase of the KP under the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG - KP).

While some Parties are making more progress in cutting emissions than others, what unsettles us the most is that not a single developed country has indicated their intention to increase their targets for 2020, neither those countries that remain under the Kyoto Protocol or, even worse, from those who have stepped outside (or were never in).

For the purpose of fulfilling commitments under Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto Protocol, a Party may, until the 100th day after the date set by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP) for the completion of the expert review process under Article 8 of the Protocol for the last year of the commitment period, continue to acquire, and other Parties may transfer to such Party, emission reduction units, certified emission reductions, assigned amount units and removal units under Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Protocol, from the preceding commitment period, provided the eligibility of any such Party has not been suspended in accordance with decision 27 / CMP.1, annex, section XV, paragraph 4.

This would have been a significant first step, yet the agreement instantly came under attack from the fossil - fuel lobby in the United States and Australia, and the recalcitrant parties managed to insert so many loopholes in the protocol that, after several international meetings culminating in a conference in Marrakech in 2001, it would, if implemented, result in minimal reductions in the rich countries» greenhouse gas emissions.

It was established in 2011 with the mandate to develop a «protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force» under the Convention applicable to all Parties, which is to be completed no later than 2015 and to come into effect in 2020.

The report features sections on, inter alia: the overview of information reported by parties; capacity building activities under the Kyoto Protocol; and capacity building activities [continue reading...]

In the preamble of the Accord, the ongoing work of both the Ad hoc working group on Long - term Cooperative Action (AWG - LCA), and the Ad hoc working group on Further Commitments of Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG - KP) are recognized.

The timely submission of the «true - up period reports» under the first commitment period is an essential step for initializing the assessment of the compliance of a Party with its commitment under Article 3, paragraph 1 of the Kyoto Protocol.

Annual compilation and accounting report for Annex B Parties under the Kyoto Protocol for 2015.

• Under the Montreal Protocol, all 197 Parties have accepted firm reduction commitments.