Sentences with phrase «party appealed in this case»

Each party appealed in this case.

Not exact matches

In 2008, I started having parties at my home and using them as case studies to see if my wine would appeal to my guests.»

The suspended General Secretary of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), has exhibited lack of principle, as he appeal to the media to allow him a peaceful mind, after deliberately refusing to enter the witness box to give evidence in the Paul Afoko case against the NPP.

Mr. Lally's past practice has included successfully representing President George W. Bush before the Miami - Dade and Orange County Boards of Election at the 2000 Florida Recounts; handling numerous complex corporate reorganizations involving multi-jurisdictional assets; recovering priceless stolen art from an international auction house; restructuring of clients» business affairs to reduce their tax and liability exposure; successfully litigating major elections cases and appeals; representing media groups in domestic and international litigation; handling complex domestic relations, divorce, and custody matters; serving as general counsel to numerous corporations in the health care, media, manufacturing, and hospitality industries; and representing parties in multi-national litigation.

The U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. circuit, has set a briefing schedule in Libertarian Party v D.C. Board of Elections, the case over whether election officials must count the votes cast for a declared write - in candidate for President.

The government stated that there are 1,390 cases on civil litigations (legal disputes between two or more parties that seek money damages or specific performance rather than criminal sanctions) in Magistrate, High Courts, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Nigeria.

«Where an application is refused, the applicant may, as of right, appeal to the Local Government Area Executive Committee of the party or to the National Secretary or National Chairman in case of online registration.

Suspended First Vice Chairman of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Sammy Crabbe, has served notice he will appeal the dismissal of his suit by a High Court Judge in a case in which he prayed the court to nullify the suspension, which he insists was unconstitutional.

On August 9, the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, denied the Libertarian Party's request to rehear the case over whether election officials must count write - ins for declared presidential write - in candidates.

After losing the appeal of her residency case, Regina Calcaterra is giving up her bid to try to oust GOP Sen. Ken LaValle and has asked Suffolk County Democratic and Working Families Party leaders to tap her friend and donor, Jennifer Maertz, to run in her place.

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has ruled that the immediate past National Spokesperson of the People's Democratic Party, Chief Olisa Metuh, has a case to answer.

UC announced yesterday that it is the first research institution to seek to «intervene,» or become a party in the case, in which the government is appealing a lower court's ruling that National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding to study human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) violates federal law.

The School challenged OFSTED's Complaints Procedure on the basis that if an organisation, such as OFSTED, has an internal Complaints Procedure it ought to be «a fair and robust process that permits a substantive challenge and which gives the complaining party the possibility, in appropriate cases, of having the decision changed» (although it was accepted that «fairness» does not necessarily require an external appeals process).

The court to which Steel Partners appealed a failed injunction to prevent Bulldog's poison - pill strategy stated: «[Steel Partners] pursues its own interests exclusively and seeks only to secure profits by selling companies» shares back to the company or to third parties in the short term, in some cases with an eye to disposing of company assets....

Appellant was a party of record in the Commission case from which this appeal is taken.

Often in test cases where the parties have unequal resources, the respondent is not put at risk of costs even if the appeal succeeds.

In addition to the hearing schedules, docket information, party information, case summaries, webcasts of appeal hearings and factums on appeal, the Court will begin to post memorandums of argument on applications for leave to appeal after they are granted.

At times, people have questioned whether in at least some cases, parties should be able to appeal prothonotary decisions directly to the Federal Court of Appeal, rather than first to a single judge of the Federal appeal prothonotary decisions directly to the Federal Court of Appeal, rather than first to a single judge of the Federal Appeal, rather than first to a single judge of the Federal Court.

Key factors the study looked at in assigning grades were whether state law mandates the appointment of attorneys for children in dependency proceedings; whether these attorneys represent the children in a client - directed manner; whether the representation continues throughout the case, including appeal; whether states provide attorneys with specialized training; whether the child is given the legal status of a party to the proceedings; and whether rules pertaining to confidentiality and immunity from liability apply to attorneys representing these children.

To spare the parties in this case in which the outcome was obvious the time and expense of further litigation, Judge Carton dismissed the appeal and affirmed the verdict in favor of «The Kookaburra Who Sits in the Old Gum Tree.»

A recent unpublished Michigan Court of Appeals case explains when and how a pre-existing condition can still result in Third Party damages.

Losing party hit with a $ 19,125 contractual fee award appealed in White v. Taylor, Case No.

In a recent case of Interactive E-Solutions v O3B the Court of Appeal held that exclusion clauses form an essential part of a contract when allocating risks between parties and should not be construed narrowly.

The importance of understanding the identities of the parties to an agreement was highlighted in the recent case of Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping and Trading PTE Singapore Court of Appeal (Civil Division).

The second question on appeal in the case was: Does Rule 219 (e) prohibit a party from disclosing a new expert witness in a refiled action, who was not disclosed in the original case?

In Buencamino v. Noftsinger, the Arizona Court of Appeals evaluated the trial court's ruling regarding whether Arizona Revised Statute Section 25 - 408 was applicable to the parties case.

The appeals court in the Gove case held that a parent places their physical, mental, and psychological condition before the court when they participate in a child custody case as a result of the legislature specifically including the parties» mental and physical health as an issue the court is required to consider.

On the facts of these appeals, it seems reasonable to infer that recognizing interest as an expense would lead to a transfer of resources between classes of parties in which unsuccessful defendants are exposed to the risks of paying high interest rates designed to pay for the cost of lending money, not just to the successful party in the case but other plaintiffs who receive financing but may not recover moneys to pay for their loans...

In the case of Cameron v Hussain and LV 2017 the Court of Appeal handed down a key decision in relation to the naming of parties in court proceedingIn the case of Cameron v Hussain and LV 2017 the Court of Appeal handed down a key decision in relation to the naming of parties in court proceedingin relation to the naming of parties in court proceedingin court proceedings.

In all three cases the Appeal Court found that no orders for costs should be made against the parties said to have acted unreasonably.

In the recent case of Meridian Credit Union Limited v Baig, 1 the Court of Appeal considered the duties owed by various parties to be honest and to not mislead each other during the course of real estate transactions.

Guidance was issued following an appeal decision in relation to three cases which had been joined and all asked the same question: when might costs be ordered payable by the unsuccessful party?

The seemingly immortal Hartshorne case is once more in the forefront, with the parties appearing before the B.C. Court of Appeal and (hopefully) finally resolving all of the issues arising from their ill fated 1989 marriage agreement.

In the final analysis, the Court of Appeal found that in this case, delay was attributable to both partieIn the final analysis, the Court of Appeal found that in this case, delay was attributable to both partiein this case, delay was attributable to both parties.

In sum, the Federal Court of Appeal's decision confirmed the integrity of solicitor - client privilege in cases where a person shares her lawyer's legal advice with commonly interested parties to a transactioIn sum, the Federal Court of Appeal's decision confirmed the integrity of solicitor - client privilege in cases where a person shares her lawyer's legal advice with commonly interested parties to a transactioin cases where a person shares her lawyer's legal advice with commonly interested parties to a transaction.

You must send copies of the notice of appeal to all the parties in your case.

The importer appealed to the Supreme Court, which held that in copyright cases the «objective reasonableness» of the losing party's legal position carries «substantial weight» in deciding whether to grant attorneys» fees to the winning party — but that factor alone is not dispositive: a party's litigation misconduct or «repeated» infringement or «overaggressive» enforcement of claims could also justify a fee award even if a party's legal argument was reasonable.

If the opposing party in your case appeals a final ruling of a trial court or agency or board, that party is the «appellant» and you are the «appellee.»

Reversing the decision of the Court of Appeal and restoring the determination of the trial judge (upheld in the High Court on appeal) the Supreme Court concluded that the facts in the present case did give rise to an inference that the intentions of the parties (to own the property in equal beneficial shares, consistent with their legal ownership) did change when Mr Kernott acquired his own property independently of Ms Appeal and restoring the determination of the trial judge (upheld in the High Court on appeal) the Supreme Court concluded that the facts in the present case did give rise to an inference that the intentions of the parties (to own the property in equal beneficial shares, consistent with their legal ownership) did change when Mr Kernott acquired his own property independently of Ms appeal) the Supreme Court concluded that the facts in the present case did give rise to an inference that the intentions of the parties (to own the property in equal beneficial shares, consistent with their legal ownership) did change when Mr Kernott acquired his own property independently of Ms Jones.

This Court of Appeal decision serves as a useful reminder that while in some cases the overriding objective and the obligation for a case to be dealt with proportionately will necessitate a speedy and efficient conclusion, in other cases, such as where a party's liberty is at stake, it is imperative that time is taken by the court to ensure that the procedural requirements are complied with, even if that means two separate hearings.

However, Dr Sanchez - Graells argues that when the case reaches the Supreme Court on appeal «[e] ven if the parties do not challenge or even raise to the UKSC's consideration the matter of the (ir) reversibility of an Article 50 notification, it is a logical given that the UKSC needs to take a stance on this point in order to be able to rule on the case».

«Given some of the decisions that have come out of the Court of Appeal which have required pretty high standards for employers in terms of drafting employment agreement language, it was encouraging to see the court unanimously uphold the language that the parties negotiated in this case,» says Susan Crawford, of Crawford Chondon & Partners LLP who represented Money Mart in Kielb v. National Money Mart Company.

(iii) In the instant case the parties, through inaction on the part of the solicitor was out of time to appeal by way of case stated, accordingly counsel advised judicial review.

Meanwhile, Judge Koh has handed down an appealable final judgment in that first California Apple v. Samsung case, the parties appealed, and Samsung has already filed its opening brief with the Federal Circuit (the part concerning design patent damages — the bulk of the billion - dollar verdict, or «$ 929 million verdict» after a limited damages retrial, to be precise — has significant support in the U.S. legal community).

The law has being clarified in the following Court of Appeal case which stands for the proposition that parties must disclose any prior legal advice on the same subject matter if they claim duress without legal advice (2015 BCCA 52).

Before the court and other parties become engaged in a lengthy and costly exercise of an appeal, a party seeking to appeal must demonstrate that it has an «arguable case» with «serious points to urge» on a question of law or jurisdiction.

Earlier this month, a federal court of appeals issued a written opinion in a workplace injury case involving claims made by an employee that the allegedly negligent party intentionally destroyed or lost evidence necessary to his case.

Although it is rare a judge would reject an agreement between the parties, the Arizona Court of Appeals in the Boncoskey v. Boncoskey case indicated a trial judge must hold a hearing if the court has determined the agreement is not fair and equitable or in the best interests of the children before making any changes to the agreement.

The Alberta Court of Appeal in a recent case held that if the parties agree to a fixed amount of severance (say, equal to 1 year's salary), the employee will be entitled to that specific amount.

A few changes should be noted with regard to appeals, particularly in the reduction of time limits available for parties to respond to an appellate brief (article 373), and the limits placed on the subjects and judgments which may not be the subject of an appeal (article 32), such as case management decisions.