Third -
party arbitration funding in Singapore and Hong Kong is evolving rapidly.
There is a growing trend of dispute resolution funding throughout the common law jurisdictions, as indicated by the recent approvals of third -
party arbitration funding in Hong Kong and Singapore through the Arbitration and Mediation Legislation (Third Party Funding)(Amendment) Ordinance and Civil Law (Amendment) Act 2017 respectively.
Not exact matches
This
arbitration provision also does not limit or constrain the Bank's right to interplead
funds in the event of claims to Collateral Account
funds by several
parties.
For instance, the
Arbitration Ordinance (AO) was amended in 2013 to allow expressly Hong Kong courts to enforce interim relief granted by emergency arbitrators (whether made in or outside Hong Kong), and this year the AO has been further amended to specifically provide for the arbitrability of intellectual property rights disputes (a key development given China's increase in patent applications) and to expressly provide that third -
party funding will be permissible for
arbitration and mediation.
This raises some interesting questions about an
arbitration tribunal's authority to allow (or refuse to allow) third
party funding and, if it is permitted, the degree to which the tribunal should control the
funder's involvement in the
arbitration.
Here are just a few thoughts on some of the issues raised by third
party funding in commercial
arbitration and how to deal with them.
In my next column, I will look at these and other issues the Tribunal may have to consider in exercising its jurisdiction over the
arbitration procedure and the involvement of a third
party funder.
Third
party litigation
funding is growing in Canada and starting to appear in commercial
arbitration as well.
So the question arises whether an
arbitration Tribunal has any jurisdiction to approve or disallow third
party funding arrangements and, if so, what terms a Tribunal ought to impose.
It can assert authority over the
party being
funded (or seeking
funding) in connection with their conduct of the
arbitration, but it has no authority over the
funder (or prospective
funder) unless it agrees to be bound by the
arbitration agreement and the Tribunal's decisions.
In my previous column, I looked at the growth of third
party litigation (and
arbitration)
funding in Canada and discussed whether an
arbitration Tribunal has any jurisdiction to control the involvement of
funders.
The arbitrator was highly critical of the conduct of the Respondent in the
arbitration, stating that the Claimant was at a clear financial disadvantage and was faced with no alternative but to seek third
party funding because the Respondent:
European and Latin American
arbitration specialists will discuss salient issues in international commercial
arbitration, such as the degree of arbitrator's disclosure and third -
party funding.
Global
Arbitration News examines the use of third
party funding in
arbitration, and answers questions such as «when is third
party funding typically available» and «what are the cost benefits»?
,» will offer four tracks devoted to third
party funding, assets tracing, fraud litigation / asset recovery, and experts in
arbitration.
The Summit is a full day event, covering topics like: commercial
arbitration and third
party funding, commercial mediation, energy dispute resolution, construction dispute resolution, Investment and finance dispute resolution.
After the proceedings concluded, the retired judge rendered an
arbitration award, which directed that the Association hire a contractor to make certain repairs and advance the
funds for the work subject to reimbursement from numerous other affected lot owners who were not
parties to any of the prior proceedings.
Following our successful
funding in the landmark case of Essar v Norscot [2016] EWHC 2361 (Comm), we launched a range of specialist
funding solutions designed to help
parties in international
arbitration make the most of that case's finding.
«Whilst the reforms in Singapore are currently limited to international
arbitration and related proceedings, I am confident that once Singapore has tested the water with third -
party funding, it will fully embrace third -
party funding of litigation and domestic
arbitration.
According to TheJudge's website, «Third -
party funders view legal claims as financial assets, in which they may invest in exchange for a return based upon the success of the
funded litigation or
arbitration.
As third
party funding is to stay in international
arbitration, principles for arbitrators,
parties and lawyers to use in such proceedings have been introduced.
By way of update to our Litigation
Funding in Singapore report on 3 August 2016, on 10 January 2017 the Singapore Parliament passed amendments to the Civil Law Act legalising third - party funding in arbitration and related proceedings in Sin
Funding in Singapore report on 3 August 2016, on 10 January 2017 the Singapore Parliament passed amendments to the Civil Law Act legalising third -
party funding in arbitration and related proceedings in Sin
funding in
arbitration and related proceedings in Singapore.
Use of third
party funding for international
arbitration is growing, especially in Hong Kong and Singapore where prohibitions against its use have been either relaxed or eliminated.
Another recent trend is third
party funding in
arbitrations, and the laws in Hong Kong and Singapore have recently been amended to allow this.
Harbour provided extensive input when Singapore, Hong Kong and Dubai considered legislation around third
party funding and the team is continuously invited to talk about
funding at
arbitration forums and litigation conferences globally.
The introduction of clear, ethical and financial standards in the form of a Code of Practice, will provide a progressive framework for the use of third
party funding in
arbitration and mediation in Hong Kong, including robust safeguards to protect against potential abuse.
Mark Hartigan, Client Services Director at Just Costs Solicitors, said: «Cost management of disputes following Jackson's reforms has become an increasing focus for
parties in
arbitration and litigation situations, both
funded and unfunded.
In Essar Oilfield Services Limited vs. Norscot Rig Management PVT Limited [2016] EWHC 2361, the High Court, applying the
Arbitration Act 1996 (the «Act») to an English - seated International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»)
arbitration, held that the arbitrator had not exceeded his powers in determining that the losing
party, Essar, should pay the
funding costs of the successful
party, Norscot.
With respect to fairness, while those commentators accept that the actual costs of the
arbitration paid for by the
funder are potentially recoverable (cf. Kardassopoulos & Fuchs vs. The Republic of Georgia ICSID case no ARB / 05/18 and case no ARB / 07/15), they maintain that the uplift or success fee «is neither a
party's cost, nor the damage suffered by the
funded party... [but is] a result of a contract privy to the
funder and the
funded party» (Henriques).
Third
party funding is used when a
party can not pay for the costs of litigation /
arbitration or when a
party wants to manage the financial risks associated with litigation /
arbitration.
Third
party funding («TPF») is the provision of
funding for litigation or
arbitration by a
funder that is unrelated to either
party.
Not so according to Jamie Curle: «Essar confirms the growing relevance of third
party funding to claimants in
arbitration and its inexorable march into the mainstream.
We arrange third -
party funding, litigation risk sharing insurance and other finance and risk management solutions for clients involved in litigation or
arbitration.
On the 14th of June 2017 Hong Kong's Legislative Council passed a law which permits third
party funding for
arbitrations based in Hong Kong.
Speaker on «Third
Party Funding in International Arbitration and Selected Features of
Arbitrations involving Sovereigns», ICC YAF, May 2012 (Frankfurt, Germany).
Can third
party funding in
arbitration diminish the menace of the unfunded claimant, asks James Clanchy
[73] A related assertion is that the
parties have agreed to pay privately for an
arbitration, but the cost of an appeal judge, courtroom and related support is publicly
funded.
Several international arbitral institutions used by
parties in the Middle East, have recognised the use of third
party funding in
arbitration proceedings and are responding to it positively.
Mick Smith reviews the principal issues that arise when considering and / or using third
party funding to finance
arbitration and how they are handled in practice.
Third -
party funding remains in the spotlight in international
arbitration and will come under renewed scrutiny following publication of the draft report of the task force established in 2013 jointly by ICCA and Queen Mary University of London.
Robert Rothkopf speaks about allocation of third
party funding costs in international
arbitration at ICC YAF Conference in Zurich on 30 June 2017.
This year, one of the sessions provided an opportunity to discuss third
party funding of disputes with representatives of five leading litigation and
arbitration funders operating in Asia.
Calunius chairman Leslie Perrin participated in a panel discussion on the use of third
party funding in
arbitration with fellow professionals and senior practitioners.
There is lots of noise about third
party funding in international
arbitration circles, and somewhat less fact and knowledge.
This blog by Robert Rothkopf, Managing Partner of Balance Legal Capital LLP, argues that recent initiatives of the LCIA and the ICC after the QMWC 2015 survey should be welcomed as they not only increase certainty and efficiency for users of
arbitration, but will also increase the number of meritorious
arbitrations suitable for financial support from third -
party funders.
On the 14th of June 2017 Hong Kong's Legislative Council passed a law which permits third
party funding for
arbitrations based in... Continued
Woodsford Litigation
Funding is one of the most well - established third
party funders in the international
arbitration and litigation market.
The international market for third
party litigation and
arbitration funding is also on the rise.
While it is early days, the combination of light statutory regulation and a rich pool of disputes means the future looks bright for third -
party funding in these
arbitration hubs.
Woodsford Litigation
Funding and Leste Litigation Finance announce a global cooperation agreement to serve the growing Brazil and Latin America market for third party funding of international arbitration and lit
Funding and Leste Litigation Finance announce a global cooperation agreement to serve the growing Brazil and Latin America market for third
party funding of international arbitration and lit
funding of international
arbitration and litigation