Not exact matches
Whether she's a prim
homemaker intoning Malevich's Suprematist call for truth over sincerity to her children at the dinner table
as if it were grace, a dishevelled homeless man in an apocalyptic wasteland declaring the old world dead, or a wasted
party reveller praising a century illuminated by electricity, Blanchett's performance has a chameleon bravura that turns what could have been a dry conceptual exercise into a hilariously absurdist provocation.
being able to acquire property (for example, doing work on a home or using separate property for the down - payment) and any contributions and services
as a spouse, parent, wage earner and
homemaker, and to the career and career potential of the other
party.
In determining the amount and duration of maintenance the court shall consider: (A) the income and property of the respective
parties including marital property distributed pursuant to subdivision five of this part; (B) the duration of the marriage and the age and health of both
parties; (C) the present and future earning capacity of both
parties; (D) the ability of the
party seeking maintenance to become self - supporting and, if applicable, the period of time and training necessary therefor; (E) reduced or lost lifetime earning capacity of the
party seeking maintenance
as a result of having foregone or delayed education, training, employment, or career opportunities during the marriage; (F) the presence of children of the marriage in the respective homes of the
parties; (G) the tax consequences to each
party; (H) contributions and services of the
party seeking maintenance
as a spouse, parent, wage earner and
homemaker, and to the career or career potential of the other
party; (I) the wasteful dissipation of marital property by either spouse; (J) any transfer or encumbrance made in contemplation of a matrimonial action without fair consideration; and (K) any other factor which the court shall expressly find to be just and proper.
In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion
as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the
parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both
parties, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the
parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse
as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home
as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either
party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors
as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.