This means that it is generally the only recourse available to employees who suffer job - related injuries, except for third -
party claims against defendants other than their employers or co-workers.
Not exact matches
A High Court
claim brought by donor Michael Foster is currently
against one named
defendant - the
party's general secretary Iain McNicol, who is being sued in a representative capacity.
A
defendant in an existing case may file a third -
party claim against someone other than the plaintiff because the outcome of the case between the plaintiff and the
defendant will affect the rights or responsibilities of that third
party.
We advise business clients and insurers on pollution and other environmental
claims, and have extensive experience litigating
claims under federal and state statutes in clean - up cases, either defending
against liability and allocation among
defendants, or seeking reimbursement for recovery costs from responsible
parties.
If you have suffered personal injury or are the bereaved loved one following a fatal incident then you may pursue a
claim against the
party (s) who you hold at fault, the «
defendant»
On March 4, 2014, the Court made the order requested, and the ParkLane
Defendants» Third
Party Claim against the Distributors will only proceed after the common issues trial has been completed.
In many situations, you can collect workers» compensation benefits while your damages
claim against a third -
party defendant is underway.
For example, if some of the
claims against some of the
parties will proceed to trial in any event, it may not be in the interest of justice to use the new fact - finding powers to grant summary judgment
against a single
defendant.
The
defendant's response must include what portions of the complaint, if any, the
defendant admits to, what specifically the
defendant contests, what defenses the
defendant may have to any of the allegations made in the complaint, and whether the
defendant has
claims against the plaintiff or any other
party.
Along with the answer, the
defendant may include a counterclaim
against the plaintiff, or a related third
party claim against another person or business.
The
defendant law firm's third
party claim against a number of accountants and another law firm was also dismissed.
If a forum state's courts have «general jurisdiction» over a
defendant, this means that the
defendant can be sued in that forum on any cause of action
against that
defendant arising anywhere in the world, regardless of any other relationship that the
claim has to the forum state (except for
claims in the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts which can be brought in a U.S. District Court located in the same state, or in an arbitration forum pursuant to a valid arbitration clause that binds the
parties, an issue beyond the scope of this question and answer).
When a lawsuit (or a
claim, or a
party) is dismissed by a court «with prejudice,» that means that the same cause of action can not be brought again by the same plaintiff
against the same
defendant.
In general, you can file a complaint asserting any cause of action whatsoever
against a
defendant, even if they are unrelated, in the same case, and if you don't, you risk having the
claims that you do not file barred by the doctrine of res judicata, which bars new lawsuits between the same
parties not only over all
claims that were actually asserted and...
If you are the injured
party claiming against another driver, you are the plaintiff and the other driver is the
defendant.
The arbitrator granted summary disposition in favor of the
defendants, finding that: (1) CHSI was not a proper respondent to the action and that Weirton failed to state
claims against CHSI; (2) all of Weirton's
claims, except for the breach - of - contract
claim against Quorum, were barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel; (3) Weirton's breach - of - contract
claim against Quorum was time - barred under the applicable Tennessee statute of limitations; (4) Weirton's tort
claims were alternatively barred by the gist - of - the - action doctrine; and (5) Weirton's unjust enrichment
claim was barred because of the
parties» contracts (the «Second Award»).
24.04 (1) Unless the court orders otherwise, where an action
against a
defendant who has crossclaimed or made a third
party claim is dismissed for delay, the crossclaim or third
party claim shall be deemed to be dismissed.
The Court may make an order for an interim payment or payment into escrow that will bind all
parties to the COF proceedingswhere the Court issatisfied that, if the
claim went to trial, the original claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial amount of money (other than costs)
against at least one of the
defendants.
Negotiated a favorable resolution on behalf of a developer of a multi-million dollar mixed - use condominium, both as the
defendant against claims of significant construction defects, and as the plaintiff in a third -
party complaint asserting indemnification and contribution
claims against subcontractor
defendants.
It allows many
parties with similar
claims to pursue them collectively
against a given
defendant.
If you have
claims against more than one
defendant or insurance company, or are considering a lawsuit over the same injuries
against another
party, you should also consider whether settling with one
defendant could limit or eliminate your right to pursue the other cases.
We have handled substantial numbers of mediations of professional negligence
claims, for both claimants and
defendants; these include several recent
claims against solicitors and accountants, most of them complex multi
party actions.
A plaintiff is a person who has suffered some type of loss and is seeking compensation from the responsible
party, who is referred to as the
defendant, by filing a
claim against them in court.
The
Defendant will have to file an Answer that says what portions of the Complaint, if any, the defendant admits to, what the Defendant contests, what defenses the Defendant may have, and whether the Defendant has claims against you or any oth
Defendant will have to file an Answer that says what portions of the Complaint, if any, the
defendant admits to, what the Defendant contests, what defenses the Defendant may have, and whether the Defendant has claims against you or any oth
defendant admits to, what the
Defendant contests, what defenses the Defendant may have, and whether the Defendant has claims against you or any oth
Defendant contests, what defenses the
Defendant may have, and whether the Defendant has claims against you or any oth
Defendant may have, and whether the
Defendant has claims against you or any oth
Defendant has
claims against you or any other
party.
In that regard, Karakatsanis J. observed that it may not be in the interests of justice to use the new fact - finding powers to grant summary judgment
against a single
defendant if the
claims against other
parties will proceed to trial in any event.
Where a
claim is brought
against a
defendant, consideration should be given not only to the likelihood of success, as compared to the value of the damages and costs the case exposes the client to, but also to the media coverage of the case, the reduction of the
party's goodwill if the issue is fought, and the cost of re-establishing that goodwill.
The respondent was the plaintiff in the underlying action who subsequently entered into two agreements with the
defendant, H&M Combustion Services Ltd. («H&M») in 2011 and 2016, to indemnify H&M from any exposure in the litigation in exchange for the assignment of its rights to the plaintiff in pursuing a third
party claim that H&M commenced
against the appellant.
Schuckman Realty v. Marine Midland Bank (244 A.D. 2d 400)- broker not entitled to recover a commission from
defendant under contract theory where broker entered into brokerage agreements with
parties other than the
defendant; broker's
claim against defendant in quantum meruit fails due to the existence of a valid and enforceable agreement governing the particular subject matter (i.e., commission agreement between broker and other
parties).