Not exact matches
in the case of our directors, officers, and security holders, (i) the receipt by the locked - up
party from us of shares of Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon (A) the exercise or settlement of stock options or RSUs granted under a stock incentive plan or other equity award plan described in this prospectus or (B) the exercise of warrants outstanding and which are described in this prospectus, or (ii) the transfer of shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, or any securities convertible into Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon a vesting or settlement event of our securities or upon the exercise of options or warrants to purchase our securities on a «cashless» or «net exercise» basis to the extent permitted by the instruments representing such options or warrants (and any transfer to us necessary to generate such amount of cash needed for the payment of taxes, including estimated taxes, due as a result of such vesting or exercise whether by means of a «net settlement» or otherwise) so long as such «cashless exercise» or «net exercise» is effected solely by the surrender of outstanding stock options or warrants (or the Class A common stock or Class B common stock issuable upon the exercise thereof) to us and our cancellation of all or a portion thereof to pay the exercise price or withholding tax and remittance obligations, provided that in the case of (i), the shares received upon such exercise or settlement are subject to the restrictions set forth above, and provided further that in the case of (ii), any filings under Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act, or any other public
filing or
disclosure of such transfer by or on behalf of the locked - up
party, shall clearly indicate in the footnotes thereto that such transfer of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described in this bullet point;
The subpoena comes after Newsday made inquiries last week about why Suffolk County Executive Steve Levy, who is considering a run for governor on a third -
party line, has
filed a different financial
disclosure form than the one mandated by county law.
Feb. 29: Newsday reports that North Hempstead officials did not enforce a 25 - year requirement that
party leaders, including Terry,
file financial
disclosure forms.
Reform
party candidate John Mangelli and independent candidate Jonathan Clarke said last week they thought they had more time because of challenges to their successful efforts to get on the ballot but would
file their
disclosures soon.
Newsday last week reported that while Republican and Democratic candidates had
filed their
disclosure forms, independent and third -
party candidates had missed their deadlines to
file.
I don't believe the intern line from the
party - I think the Laz took the gig to raise some quick cash so that his campaign
disclosure statement next week shows some increase from the last
filing.
It was the first federal law to establish public
disclosure of financial spending by political
parties (but not candidates) by requiring the national committees of political
parties to
file post-election reports regarding their contributions to individual candidates and their own individual expenditures.
Leaders of the New York Public Interest Research Group
filed a five - page complaint with the Joint Commission on Public Ethics, saying political
parties that spend money on anything from ads to memoranda pushing legislators to vote a certain way must
file bi-monthly
disclosure reports with JCOPE.
Torres» second challenger, Jayson Cancel, Jr. just registered with the CFB and his State Board of Election campaign
disclosure filing lists the New York Martial Arts
Party as his authorized committee.
Among other things, this review will include an examination of contracts and billing, as well as any financial
disclosure statements
filed with the Town of North Hempstead Board of Ethics in Terry's capacity as a
party officer.»
A review of Rice's DA account
disclosures filed with the state Board of Elections since her ascension to the House in 2015 show she has paid $ 4,500 for ads in the publications of the Building and Construction Trades Council of Nassau and Suffolk Counties, $ 150 for a «journal ad» from an African - American church in Hempstead and $ 21,000 to local Democratic
Party organizations that have supported her re-election to Congress.
IPR protection becomes very tedious and costly and at times impossible due to prior
disclosure or
filing by third
parties.
In papers
filed yesterday, the consumers argue that the Andersons have continued to violate a court order and the terms of a settlement agreement the
parties entered into more than three years ago, by selling puppies from substandard breeding facilities and violating
disclosure requirements as to where the puppies they sell come from.
The conduct of a
file after this initial consultation requires ongoing legal advice as to the client's options, the range of outcomes and opportunities for negotiation, adjusted to account for improvements in the information available as a result of
disclosure and discovery, and the evolving circumstances of the
parties and their children.
For example, in Colorado civil cases, some of the more common grounds for an award of attorneys» fees to a defending
party are: (a) a two - sided contractual fee shifting term, (b) dismissal of the case before
filing an answer for failure to state a claim when tort claims were asserted, (c) a determination that the suit was groundless, frivolous or vexatious, (d) violation of certain rules relating to
disclosure of information to the other
party, (e) a statutory fee shifting provision in the case of a claim based upon a statutorily created right which is present in some statutes but not others.
Mandatory
disclosure includes each
party filing a financial affidavit with the court and providing necessary financial documents such as bank statements, tax returns, credit card statements, and other required financial documents.
At least 14 days before the first CMC each
party must
file and serve a
disclosure report (verified by a statement of truth) which briefly describes potentially relevant documents; where and with whom they are located; how electronic documents are stored; estimates the broad range of costs that standard
disclosure would involve; and states the
disclosure directions sought.
To
file materials under seal with the court requires the court's approval and may require that the
parties address the balance between the principle of an open courts and the harm from the public
disclosure of the confidential information.
In some cases, the court may require affidavit evidence explaining the significant of the information sought to be
filed and the consequences of its
disclosure to the public to the
parties.
The necessity for
parties to prepare and bring to court witness statements,
file direction questionnaires and crucial statements of case outweigh the courts» less onerous directions and relaxed rules of evidence and
disclosure that come from hearing a case allocated to the small claims track.
The appeal tribunal, chaired by Christopher Bredt with Robert Armstrong, Janet Leiper, Barbara Murchie, and John Spekkens wrote: «the hearing panel erred in dismissing the motion for
disclosure of the
files of the lawyers who acted for the other
parties.
In a digital world, sharing information online comes as second nature to many people, but if you're a
party to a court case and post
disclosure materials on the Internet, don't be surprised when a judge decides to restrict your access to those
files.
The following are some examples where we may disclose your personal information: such
disclosure is necessary to collect fees or disbursements; we contract with a third
party to provide us with certain services such as archival
file storage or insurance; (in such cases, we will use contractual or other means to ensure the third
party service provider is bound by obligations regarding privacy which are consistent with this policy); or we engage expert witnesses or other law firms on your behalf.
In 2013, Judge Cote entered a series of rulings that set the standard for litigating RMBS cases involving tens of thousands of securitized loans, ruling among other things that plaintiffs could rely on statistical sampling, that the
parties had to engage in early efforts to identify the best representation of loan
files and guidelines for the loans, and requiring early
disclosure of reunderwriting results.
The bill would require
disclosure of third -
party litigation funding in class actions and multidistrict litigation within 10 days of a case
filing, or 10 days after a funding deal.
Any nongovernmental
party to a civil proceeding must
file an original and one copy of a
disclosure statement that:
Electronic
disclosure gives the other
party read - only access to the full case
file on CaseLines for a period of time.
Alternatively the other
party can be sent the PDF version of the complete
disclosure case
file by secure email.
The conference is held in front of a judge, and the
parties are required to have
filed certain pleadings including a Financial Affidavit, completion of financial
disclosure and if minor children, completion of a parenting class and a child support guidelines worksheet.
However, prior to the
filing of the complaint for divorce, the
parties make a full financial
disclosure to each other — and voluntarily enter into a separation agreement that resolves all relevant issues, such as the division of all marital property, spousal support and custody if there are children involved.
As part of a divorce or legal separation, the court will likely require both
parties to
file a series of financial
disclosures.
Our regulatory and compliance services include analyzing federal and state requirements and restrictions (e.g., licensing / approvals, housing counseling, marketing, underwriting,
disclosures, fee permissibility, cross-selling, UDAP / UDAAP, servicing, claims
filing, and GNMA HMBS program), and developing and implementing reverse mortgage products strategies, including policies, procedures and internal controls for reverse mortgage lenders and servicers (including quality control plan drafting and revision), third -
party risk management, and auditing of day - to - day operations.
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano -
disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency
disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency
disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which
party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the
parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and
filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained