Sentences with phrase «party in control»

Those people have a business (and monetary) interest in keeping the 2 parties that are currently dominant parties in control of the government.
The traditional security model has focused on server side security which puts large third parties in control the most sensitive data, this is security at the «center» of the network.
The owner or party in control of the property is liable for head - on collisions caused by these dangers.
It is unusual to have the same party in control for three or more terms so GOP «winning» isn't a big shock.
More bluntly, the Court stated that just because the real party in control did not sign the franchise agreement should not mean that it could escape liability for breach of the duty of good faith.
Blockchains are great when multiple parties need to read the same information but for whatever reason there can't be or shouldn't be any specific individual party in control of that data.
Congressional turnover is common in a U.S. president's second year in office — with the party in control losing ground in five of the past six midterm elections.
You are fixated on blaming the Rebulicans for ills created by a two - party system with both parties in control at one time or another.
But if the chamber remains closely divided, with either party in control; or, (G - d forbid), deadlocks, it's going to be tough to bring this issue back to the floor for passage.
How do you persuade voters you can improve their lives when it was your party in control as things took a turn for the worse?
With one party in control, two of the branches are potentially compromised, and the other branch may see long term power shift to the extent new justices are appointed.
To make matters worse, those wins are even more difficult to reverse due to gerrymandering by the parties in control at the state district level and a 10 - year redistricting process.
With one party in control, it is much easier to push through initiatives of that party and its supporters without a rigorous debates.
That means an allegiance to the taxpayers of the state, then the party in control and finally one's self.
One of the most revealing takes was Dave Weigel's breakdown of the states destined to gain Congressional seats vs. the party in control of the redistricting process — not so pretty for Dems.
A raucous leadership fight erupted on the floor of the Senate around 3 p.m., with two Democrats, Pedro Espada Jr. of the Bronx and Hiram Monserrate of Queens, joining the 30 Senate Republicans in a motion that would displace Democrats as the party in control.
The party in control of the state senate will also determine the fate of a proposed pied - à - terre tax.
Republican, Democrat, no matter, this happens because the party in control buys votes, with pork or promises.
On the other hand, if voters believe the institution of Congress is fundamentally broken in regards to ethics, they are likely to punish the party in control of the levers of power.
A leadership fight erupted on the floor of the Senate with two Democrats, Pedro Espada Jr. and Hiram Monserrate, joining the 30 Senate Republicans in a motion that would displace Democrats as the party in control.
Meanwhile about One Million New Yorkers are denied the right to vote in the primaries we pay for simply because we won't egister in the party in control of our electoral district and no one gives a dime about that!
But her 18 - point margin of defeat was no worse than what befell several fellow Democrats, many of them veteran politicians, who spent tens of millions of dollars more than Curtis in their failed quest to keep their party in control of the Senate.
In only three cases did the party in control change in the year of the lawsuit filing, and for each of those three cases, the party in control changed again before the lawsuit was decided.
Beyond that point, we believe that this is not a major concern for three reasons: 1) the amount of time between lawsuit filing and the court decision is often long and always unpredictable; 2) the party in control often changes between the lawsuit filing and decision; and 3) lawsuits do not appear to be precipitated by changes in political regime.
We checked the validity of this decision by rerunning our analysis, attributing the funding associated with an SFJ in any given year to the party in control of the state government in that same year.
In almost half of the cases (11 out of 23), the party in control changed between the time of filing and the time of decision.
Because most school - finance lawsuits are aimed at increasing funding for poor districts specifically, we designed our analysis to measure how the effects of SFJs, and of the party in control of the state government at the time of the decision, might be different for school districts with high rates of students in poverty and for districts where the students are better - off financially.
On average, the party in control in the state was stable for six years prior to the filing of a case.
Buying for example assets for the proverbial fifty cents on the dollar is not going to do you any good if the party in control of the assets doesn't have the competence or intention to realize that value.
Merit selection would help protect the judiciary from major changes by either party in control, especially when there is high turnover and a loss of institutional knowledge, the judges said they were told.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z