Sentences with phrase «party liability in case»

Third party liability Insurance: provides cover against third party liability in case of accidents.
There could be third party liability in your case that will allow us to pursue compensation beyond workers» compensation benefits.
This form of insurance provides coverage against any risks from third party liabilities in case the car was involved in a mishap where the third party or his / her collaterals suffered any damage.

Not exact matches

Many Indian and foreign nuclear energy technology companies have not been willing to supply nuclear technology and services to India because laws in the country leave suppliers open to financial liability for damages to third parties in the case of a nuclear accident.
Indian laws leave suppliers open to financial liability for damages to third parties in the case of a nuclear accidentThird, many Canadian and other foreign companies have been unwilling to supply nuclear technology and services to India because Indian laws leave suppliers open to financial liability for damages to third parties in the case of a nuclear accident.
Mr. Lally's past practice has included successfully representing President George W. Bush before the Miami - Dade and Orange County Boards of Election at the 2000 Florida Recounts; handling numerous complex corporate reorganizations involving multi-jurisdictional assets; recovering priceless stolen art from an international auction house; restructuring of clients» business affairs to reduce their tax and liability exposure; successfully litigating major elections cases and appeals; representing media groups in domestic and international litigation; handling complex domestic relations, divorce, and custody matters; serving as general counsel to numerous corporations in the health care, media, manufacturing, and hospitality industries; and representing parties in multi-national litigation.
3rd Party Liability: Similarly to car insurance this type of coverage protects you in case you inflicted a loss or damage to another Party Liability: Similarly to car insurance this type of coverage protects you in case you inflicted a loss or damage to another partyparty
Liability under section 9 of the ESA has been found in cases based on the issuance of permits or licenses by a governmental body to a private party in which the authorized activity causes a take of an endangered species.
Applying the third party governmental liability principles of the Strahan and Loggerhead Turtle cases, a local government could find itself liable under the ESA for authorizing cat colonies that result in the illegal take by feral cats of an endangered species.
You agree to reimburse each Square Enix Party (as defined in section 3.2 above) in full for the amount of any and all claims, proceedings, actions, demands, damages, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses suffered or incurred by such Square Enix Party, in each case as a result of or in connection with: (a) any breach of any of your obligations, warranties, representations or undertakings under the Site Terms; and / or (b) any illegal use of your Membership or Account by any person (s).
Key factors the study looked at in assigning grades were whether state law mandates the appointment of attorneys for children in dependency proceedings; whether these attorneys represent the children in a client - directed manner; whether the representation continues throughout the case, including appeal; whether states provide attorneys with specialized training; whether the child is given the legal status of a party to the proceedings; and whether rules pertaining to confidentiality and immunity from liability apply to attorneys representing these children.
Since tort damages are recoverable, the courts have attempted to carefully define the range of potential defendants in interference cases to ensure that the liability of the contracting parties is limited to damages available for breach of contract.
In cases where liability is disputed there will be witness statements from both parties.
We advise business clients and insurers on pollution and other environmental claims, and have extensive experience litigating claims under federal and state statutes in clean - up cases, either defending against liability and allocation among defendants, or seeking reimbursement for recovery costs from responsible parties.
As an example of the former, one of the subject areas I have used for a writing assignment is landowner liability to trespassing children.40 Even though these cases are not within our first - semester coverage, I assign several cases from a later part of the casebook so the students can see how this area of law has evolved and how it works in different jurisdictions.41 An example of reordering covered material occurs around the final writing assignment, which involves a landlord's liability for the criminal act of a third party.
In these cases, all parties connected with the ownership, operation or leasing of the property need experienced legal representation from attorneys who understand both the insurance industry and the complex laws governing premises liability claims.
The attorneys at ADLI Law Group have deep experience in assisting parties affected by bankruptcy cases domestically and internationally to maximize asset recovery, prosecute or defend issues in adversary proceedings, restructure financing and limit liabilities.
Determination of the amount of liability between the parties when a motorcycle is involved is almost always an issue, and retaining the services of a lawyer with experience in these types of cases is vital.
In Indiana, the at - fault party's insurance is generally not required to pay any damages under the liability coverage until the final settlement or resolution of your case.
When you shop for a contractor for a home renovation, you are often reminded about the need to ensure your contractor has third party liability insurance and workers» compensation insurance — just in case.
In most of these cases, the responsible party will have liability insurance.
Our accomplished Atlanta drunk driving injury lawyers have the ability to prove dram shop liability in these cases, so that all responsible parties are held accountable for their actions.
In cases where third - party liability may have caused or contributed to your injuries, however, you may be able to file a third - party claim against the responsible party as well.
As a personal injuries lawyer applying the laws in BC to injury cases since 1995 I can say having ICBC on both sides of a lawsuit firstly results in ICBC benefits being deducted from any claim you may have against the other party with third party liability coverage from ICBC.
In some instances, especially in regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurreIn some instances, especially in regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurrein regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurrein the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurred.
Liability in a truck accident case can be a confusing concept — one that other parties, such as insurance companies, will probably not adequately explain.
Our Delray Beach personal injury lawyers at the Law Offices of Aronberg, Aronberg & Green know that juries often time allocate liability to various parties in personal injury cases, consistent with the evidence presented to then.
Besides property owners, other parties that can be held liable in a premises liability case include:
Despite this general rule, courts have struggled with questions involving making owners of programmed systems responsible for damages suffered by third parties as a result of their use, in many cases due to policy concerns about imposing such liability... there is a significant difference between an entity that makes copies at the request of an individual and an entity that uses pre-programmed computers to carry out the request automatically...
In Elevantine the judge stated that parties could reasonably impose a cap on liability and that the proposed cap of # 14K in this case was reasonablIn Elevantine the judge stated that parties could reasonably impose a cap on liability and that the proposed cap of # 14K in this case was reasonablin this case was reasonable.
In some cases, repeated frivolous litigation against a defendant may raise the cost of directors and officers liability insurance for that party, interfering with an organization's ability to operate.
Issues often arise in pursuing a personal injury claim in these types of cases because liability can often be difficult to assess given the number of parties involved.
While it may seem obvious to you that another party caused your injuries, in these types of cases it's essential to understand how liability works so you can prove that you are owed compensation.
As succinctly summarized by Justice Belobaba, the case addressed the intersection of two lines of authority, namely that which permits a defendant who settles a class action to seek recovery from other non-settling parties, and the axiom that causation must be proven in order to establish liability.
Because several parties could be involved in a product liability case, the process may be complex.
The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in Excalibur Ventures v Texas Keystone Inc [2016] EWCA Civ 3436 (Comm), which is an important case on the liability of third - party litigation funders for a non-party costs order under CPR 46.2.
How can this Court apportion liability against a non party who has had no opportunity to defend himself as in the Martin case?
While some liability injury insurance companies may attempt to calculate personal injury damages based on factors such as similar case results and the reputation and experience of the injured party's attorney, there is no precise way to put a dollar figure on pain and suffering and lost opportunities in life, among other elements.
He has tried more than 50 jury trials to verdict including cases in the area of Title VII, ADEA, Section 1983, police practices and procedure, commercial and residential construction defect cases, first party property, first party automobile, premises liability, products liability, trucking and automobile bodily injury lawsuits.
He has acted successfully in many major commercial cases involving corporate and contract disputes, shareholders litigation, first party claims under property policies, disputes under liability policies, D & O, subrogation, casualty, product liability and professional malpractice claims.
In a premises liability case, there may be more than one party responsible for the property.
Depending on the type of product that injured you, and the circumstances of your accident, the responsible parties in a product liability case can include:
In more complex cases, such as those involving serious physical injuries or liability on the part of another driver or third - party, victims can quickly realize that ICBC is not always on their side.
In order to win a personal injury case and obtain the compensation you need to cover your expenses, your attorney must establish negligence before a judge and jury to prove the liability of the other party or parties.
Yet, in more complex cases, liability for an accident may be split between two or more parties.
Determining the defendant in a product liability case is not a matter of choosing one liable party over another; any party involved in a defective product's chain of distribution may be held accountable through a product liability lawsuit.
This third party liability in IP rights infringement goes back a number of years in US case law, and was brought to the forefront in the 1996 case Fonovisa Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc..
In many of these cases the question of liability, or fault for the accident, is a point of contention between the parties.
As to the remainder of the Arbitration, following the Second PFA, on 9 August 2016, afterservice by the parties of revised statements of case and evidence in support, the Tribunal ordered that there be a further hearing on all remaining questions of: (i) the liability of the KRG under the claims advanced by the Claimants; and (ii) the liability of the Claimants under the counterclaims advanced by the KRG.
However, for slip and fall cases the Negligence Act says that a parties liability to pay court costs in a personal injury lawsuit is in the same proportion as their liability to make good the damage or loss, unless otherwise ordered.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z