Third party liability Insurance: provides cover against third
party liability in case of accidents.
There could be third
party liability in your case that will allow us to pursue compensation beyond workers» compensation benefits.
This form of insurance provides coverage against any risks from third
party liabilities in case the car was involved in a mishap where the third party or his / her collaterals suffered any damage.
Not exact matches
Many Indian and foreign nuclear energy technology companies have not been willing to supply nuclear technology and services to India because laws
in the country leave suppliers open to financial
liability for damages to third
parties in the
case of a nuclear accident.
Indian laws leave suppliers open to financial
liability for damages to third
parties in the
case of a nuclear accidentThird, many Canadian and other foreign companies have been unwilling to supply nuclear technology and services to India because Indian laws leave suppliers open to financial
liability for damages to third
parties in the
case of a nuclear accident.
Mr. Lally's past practice has included successfully representing President George W. Bush before the Miami - Dade and Orange County Boards of Election at the 2000 Florida Recounts; handling numerous complex corporate reorganizations involving multi-jurisdictional assets; recovering priceless stolen art from an international auction house; restructuring of clients» business affairs to reduce their tax and
liability exposure; successfully litigating major elections
cases and appeals; representing media groups
in domestic and international litigation; handling complex domestic relations, divorce, and custody matters; serving as general counsel to numerous corporations
in the health care, media, manufacturing, and hospitality industries; and representing
parties in multi-national litigation.
3rd
Party Liability: Similarly to car insurance this type of coverage protects you in case you inflicted a loss or damage to another
Party Liability: Similarly to car insurance this type of coverage protects you
in case you inflicted a loss or damage to another
partyparty
Liability under section 9 of the ESA has been found
in cases based on the issuance of permits or licenses by a governmental body to a private
party in which the authorized activity causes a take of an endangered species.
Applying the third
party governmental
liability principles of the Strahan and Loggerhead Turtle
cases, a local government could find itself liable under the ESA for authorizing cat colonies that result
in the illegal take by feral cats of an endangered species.
You agree to reimburse each Square Enix
Party (as defined
in section 3.2 above)
in full for the amount of any and all claims, proceedings, actions, demands, damages, losses,
liabilities, costs and expenses suffered or incurred by such Square Enix
Party,
in each
case as a result of or
in connection with: (a) any breach of any of your obligations, warranties, representations or undertakings under the Site Terms; and / or (b) any illegal use of your Membership or Account by any person (s).
Key factors the study looked at
in assigning grades were whether state law mandates the appointment of attorneys for children
in dependency proceedings; whether these attorneys represent the children
in a client - directed manner; whether the representation continues throughout the
case, including appeal; whether states provide attorneys with specialized training; whether the child is given the legal status of a
party to the proceedings; and whether rules pertaining to confidentiality and immunity from
liability apply to attorneys representing these children.
Since tort damages are recoverable, the courts have attempted to carefully define the range of potential defendants
in interference
cases to ensure that the
liability of the contracting
parties is limited to damages available for breach of contract.
In cases where
liability is disputed there will be witness statements from both
parties.
We advise business clients and insurers on pollution and other environmental claims, and have extensive experience litigating claims under federal and state statutes
in clean - up
cases, either defending against
liability and allocation among defendants, or seeking reimbursement for recovery costs from responsible
parties.
As an example of the former, one of the subject areas I have used for a writing assignment is landowner
liability to trespassing children.40 Even though these
cases are not within our first - semester coverage, I assign several
cases from a later part of the casebook so the students can see how this area of law has evolved and how it works
in different jurisdictions.41 An example of reordering covered material occurs around the final writing assignment, which involves a landlord's
liability for the criminal act of a third
party.
In these
cases, all
parties connected with the ownership, operation or leasing of the property need experienced legal representation from attorneys who understand both the insurance industry and the complex laws governing premises
liability claims.
The attorneys at ADLI Law Group have deep experience
in assisting
parties affected by bankruptcy
cases domestically and internationally to maximize asset recovery, prosecute or defend issues
in adversary proceedings, restructure financing and limit
liabilities.
Determination of the amount of
liability between the
parties when a motorcycle is involved is almost always an issue, and retaining the services of a lawyer with experience
in these types of
cases is vital.
In Indiana, the at - fault
party's insurance is generally not required to pay any damages under the
liability coverage until the final settlement or resolution of your
case.
When you shop for a contractor for a home renovation, you are often reminded about the need to ensure your contractor has third
party liability insurance and workers» compensation insurance — just
in case.
In most of these
cases, the responsible
party will have
liability insurance.
Our accomplished Atlanta drunk driving injury lawyers have the ability to prove dram shop
liability in these
cases, so that all responsible
parties are held accountable for their actions.
In cases where third -
party liability may have caused or contributed to your injuries, however, you may be able to file a third -
party claim against the responsible
party as well.
As a personal injuries lawyer applying the laws
in BC to injury
cases since 1995 I can say having ICBC on both sides of a lawsuit firstly results
in ICBC benefits being deducted from any claim you may have against the other
party with third
party liability coverage from ICBC.
In some instances, especially in regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurre
In some instances, especially
in regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurre
in regards to product
liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved
in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurre
in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one
party responsible for the injuries incurred.
Liability in a truck accident
case can be a confusing concept — one that other
parties, such as insurance companies, will probably not adequately explain.
Our Delray Beach personal injury lawyers at the Law Offices of Aronberg, Aronberg & Green know that juries often time allocate
liability to various
parties in personal injury
cases, consistent with the evidence presented to then.
Besides property owners, other
parties that can be held liable
in a premises
liability case include:
Despite this general rule, courts have struggled with questions involving making owners of programmed systems responsible for damages suffered by third
parties as a result of their use,
in many
cases due to policy concerns about imposing such
liability... there is a significant difference between an entity that makes copies at the request of an individual and an entity that uses pre-programmed computers to carry out the request automatically...
In Elevantine the judge stated that parties could reasonably impose a cap on liability and that the proposed cap of # 14K in this case was reasonabl
In Elevantine the judge stated that
parties could reasonably impose a cap on
liability and that the proposed cap of # 14K
in this case was reasonabl
in this
case was reasonable.
In some
cases, repeated frivolous litigation against a defendant may raise the cost of directors and officers
liability insurance for that
party, interfering with an organization's ability to operate.
Issues often arise
in pursuing a personal injury claim
in these types of
cases because
liability can often be difficult to assess given the number of
parties involved.
While it may seem obvious to you that another
party caused your injuries,
in these types of
cases it's essential to understand how
liability works so you can prove that you are owed compensation.
As succinctly summarized by Justice Belobaba, the
case addressed the intersection of two lines of authority, namely that which permits a defendant who settles a class action to seek recovery from other non-settling
parties, and the axiom that causation must be proven
in order to establish
liability.
Because several
parties could be involved
in a product
liability case, the process may be complex.
The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment
in Excalibur Ventures v Texas Keystone Inc [2016] EWCA Civ 3436 (Comm), which is an important
case on the
liability of third -
party litigation funders for a non-
party costs order under CPR 46.2.
How can this Court apportion
liability against a non
party who has had no opportunity to defend himself as
in the Martin
case?
While some
liability injury insurance companies may attempt to calculate personal injury damages based on factors such as similar
case results and the reputation and experience of the injured
party's attorney, there is no precise way to put a dollar figure on pain and suffering and lost opportunities
in life, among other elements.
He has tried more than 50 jury trials to verdict including
cases in the area of Title VII, ADEA, Section 1983, police practices and procedure, commercial and residential construction defect
cases, first
party property, first
party automobile, premises
liability, products
liability, trucking and automobile bodily injury lawsuits.
He has acted successfully
in many major commercial
cases involving corporate and contract disputes, shareholders litigation, first
party claims under property policies, disputes under
liability policies, D & O, subrogation, casualty, product
liability and professional malpractice claims.
In a premises
liability case, there may be more than one
party responsible for the property.
Depending on the type of product that injured you, and the circumstances of your accident, the responsible
parties in a product
liability case can include:
In more complex
cases, such as those involving serious physical injuries or
liability on the part of another driver or third -
party, victims can quickly realize that ICBC is not always on their side.
In order to win a personal injury
case and obtain the compensation you need to cover your expenses, your attorney must establish negligence before a judge and jury to prove the
liability of the other
party or
parties.
Yet,
in more complex
cases,
liability for an accident may be split between two or more
parties.
Determining the defendant
in a product
liability case is not a matter of choosing one liable
party over another; any
party involved
in a defective product's chain of distribution may be held accountable through a product
liability lawsuit.
This third
party liability in IP rights infringement goes back a number of years
in US
case law, and was brought to the forefront
in the 1996
case Fonovisa Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc..
In many of these
cases the question of
liability, or fault for the accident, is a point of contention between the
parties.
As to the remainder of the Arbitration, following the Second PFA, on 9 August 2016, afterservice by the
parties of revised statements of
case and evidence
in support, the Tribunal ordered that there be a further hearing on all remaining questions of: (i) the
liability of the KRG under the claims advanced by the Claimants; and (ii) the
liability of the Claimants under the counterclaims advanced by the KRG.
However, for slip and fall
cases the Negligence Act says that a
parties liability to pay court costs
in a personal injury lawsuit is
in the same proportion as their
liability to make good the damage or loss, unless otherwise ordered.