Not exact matches
What began as a
small, focused Enbridge campaign with northern First Nations grew into a political juggernaut that arguably contributed to the Harper
government's 2015 defeat, after the pro-tanker Conservative
party lost more votes in B.C. than in the rest
of the country combined.
There are a number
of things
governments could do to strengthen economic growth and the platforms
of all the
parties contain
small initiatives that might help.
As a third -
party certifier
of the SBA's WOSB Federal Contract Program, WBENC introduced a Women Owned
Small Business
Government Certification (WOSBGC) Program.
A
small majority (54 %)
of those who voted for the governing federal Liberals also take the position that B.C.'s
government is in the wrong, while most — but far from all — past federal New Democrats support the
party's provincial wing in B.C.:
take a
small amount
of financing either through a
government grant program, a loan, or by selling an ownership interest in the technology to a third
party; do this in order to further develop the technology and increase the likelihood
of a successful licensing outcome (or to maximize the value
of a licensing deal)
BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP)-- Three
small opposition
parties are calling for a boycott
of a
government - sponsored referendum seeking support for opposing any future European Union plans to resettle refugees among member countries.
Despotic capitalism, on the other hand, is characterized by control
of the
government by an individual or a relatively
small group such as military junta, an aristocracy or elite class, or a minority political
party.
whatever the democratic
party tells you is a lie do the opposite they would want you to go against republicans becuase our country is not a democracy its a republic people wake up the republican
party isnt about the rich its about all
of us lower taxes for all the republican
party is about
smaller government not intruding in your life the democrats know this and started a class war to make blacks and hispanics flood their cause im a 24 latino and switched republican last year i was fooled my whole life read history and you will see im telling the truth
We welcome input from diverse
parties, ranging from
small agricultural producers and civil society organizations, to representatives
of governments and agroindustry.
Voters were courted by political institutions from all sides — the
government, all the political
parties apart from UKIP, the Bank
of England, international organizations, foreign
governments, the US President himself and the «Remain» or StrongerIn campaign convened by Conservative, Labour and the
smaller parties.
@Stuart White:
Of course there's a difference between (a) a minority
government which a
smaller party permits to remain in office by not using its votes to defeat its programme and legislation, either ad hoc or in accordance with some semi-formal pact, and (b) a coalition in which both
parties hold seats in the Cabinet.
As early as the second month
of the Obama presidency, an anti-Obama conservative grassroots movement was established called the Tea
Party (firstly an allusion to the Boston Tea
Party, which has long been used by anti-tax libertarians and conservatives to celebrate the virtues
of non-interference and
small government; and secondly an acronym for «Taxed Enough Already»
Party).
The background to Mrs May's decision to call a snap election is the
government's
small majority
of 17 and the abiding weakness
of the Labour
Party under Mr. Corbyn.
This also brings into the picture a different dimension in the race between these two
parties which lead the polls which estimate that Syriza has anything up to a 2 % lead over New Democracy (a remarkably
small lead considering the supposed unpopularity
of the
government which New Democracy heads): the question
of Europe.
Instead, the
party with the largest number
of seats — in this case, it looks like the Conservatives — will attempt to form a coalition
government with one
of the
smaller parties.
was a member
of the
smallest minor
party in a coalition
government, the country faced the existential crisis to end them all as war raged across Europe.
The impression a dispassionate observer would have from the failure
of security and law enforcement during the Bayelsa election (which was conducted in Nigeria's
smallest state with the lowest number
of registered voters) would be that the federal
government permitted or condoned the strong - arm tactics
of the ruling
party's candidate in his ultimately vain effort to secure that state's rulership by force.
«Some
of them have been
small, others large, but together they have turned the
party inwards rather than outwards, looking to the past rather than to new ideas, resting on easy rhetoric rather than taking hard decisions — and above all seeking to distance ourselves from our time in
government, rather than building on it, in terms
of both policy content and political culture and dynamic.»
[18] After the last election Helle Thorning - Schmidt started working towards forming a centre - left
government coalition consisting
of the Socialist People's
Party and the Social Liberal
Party with parliamentary support from the
small Red - Green Alliance.
This would certainly have had an influence on him becoming deputy prime minister, which had never happened previously in this country to the leader
of the
smaller party in a coalition
government.
- Certainly my view is that Labour should offer and advocate legislation and a referendum on AV + and expect its MPs to back that as a confidence measure, and that the
government and
party leadership would advocate a yes (with a
small number
of rebels no doubt on the no side in the referendum itself).
By contrast, a
small faction
of the
government party can have disproportionate influence.
«Our candidates including John Flynn for District Attorney, and our state legislative candidates Monica Wallace, Amber
Small, Tom Loughran and Steve Meyer exemplify the progressive values
of the Democratic
Party and our commitment to ethics and reform in
government.
Supporters also argue that electoral systems using proportional representation (PR) often enable
smaller parties to become decisive in Parliament, thus gaining a power
of leverage against the
Government.
The more seats a
party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
party or grouping has, the more chance it has
of forming a
government - with 198 seats out
of 646 the Conservative
Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
Party could only form a
government if significant numbers
of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main
party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into
government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event
of the next election going exactly the same way in terms
of votes then 214 out
of 650 is 32.93 %
of seats compared to at 198 out
of 646 seats - 30.65 %
of seats and the Conservative
Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13
Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a
government allowing for the greater number
of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a
government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in
small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing
of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.
A Conservative backbencher suggesting a pact with UKIP said Nigel Farage has got «a lot
of talent» when asked if the
smaller party leader could serve as a minister in a Tory
government.
Failure to do so reinforces the impression that the
party is barely in power at all, trying to influence decisions being taken by a
small circle at the heart
of government.
But the past year has seen a repeat
of the drama and turmoil
of the Major years: a rancorous
party split over Europe within months
of victory and a slim commons majority making the
government vulnerable to defeats by opposition ambushes and even
small backbench rebellions.
Of course, that is not a platform for majority government, but amplifying and defending the views of a sizeable minority is a legitimate goal for a small part
Of course, that is not a platform for majority
government, but amplifying and defending the views
of a sizeable minority is a legitimate goal for a small part
of a sizeable minority is a legitimate goal for a
small party.
This system heavily biases the vote towards increasing the number
of seats
of the top two
parties and reducing the seats
of smaller parties, a principle known in political science as Duverger's law, and thus minority
governments are relatively uncommon.
Although the arrangement rarely comes with guaranteed ministerial jobs, a confidence and supply deal would typically see some elements
of the
smaller party's manifesto enacted by the minority
government in return for their support.
There was some discussion after the election
of the possibility
of creating a Conservative minority
government and, because the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown had the first opportunity to form a
government, there were also talks about creating some sort
of alliance between the Labour
Party, the Liberal Democrats and other
smaller parties.
Nevertheless, usually an incumbent
government that loses its plurality in the House simply resigns, especially if the main opposition
party is only a few seats short
of having a majority or if it feels it has no chance
of winning the support
of enough members
of smaller parties to win an initial confidence vote.
Smaller parties need to be able to demonstrate their distinct contribution to
government to avoid «the narrative
of the lost moral compass».
It seems more likely that the Coalition
of 2010, as organised by a very
small clique
of political elites (probable ministers and senior
party figures), required the bypassing
of Westminster and the Coalition agreements, precluding formal democratic procedure and parliamentary
government founded on accountability to the electorate.
Even if the Tories are the largest
party with the most number
of seats and will therefore have the first chance to form a
government, she will find it difficult to go into coalition with a
smaller party like the Liberal Democrats, who are fundamentally opposed to Brexit.
Despite Mr Cameron's rising personal popularity, the Conservatives have dropped four points as voters abandon the traditional
parties of government for
small parties, including the SNP.
The tradition in the United Kingdom appears to be that single
party government is the norm, even when a general election leads to a hung Parliament, and that the largest single
party, rather than participate in a coalition
government, usually forms its own ministry, supported tacitly or openly by one
of the
smaller parties.
If voters strongly associate a
small party with one
of the major
parties — and an electoral pact or formal call for tactical voting would be a clear signal — they will believe a vote for the
small party is effectively a vote for a
government led by its proximate major
party.
Lorigo also claimed that his
party applies its alleged principles
of smaller government and lower taxes when picking candidates, but a 2012 Buffalo News profile
of the
party entitled, «Conservatives flock to the public payroll; Many
party players hold jobs that rely on
government's ability to tax and spend,» clearly outlines how the Lorigo machine uses its
party endorsements simply to gain power and influence, not help the taxpayers
of Erie County.
The possibility
of some SNP involvement in a Labour - led
government materialised when Angus Robertson, the SNP's leader in the House
of Commons suggested its MPs would be willing to join Labour, the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and MPs from other
smaller parties to form a rainbow coalition.
In New Zealand, over recent years, the largest
party has typically formed a minority
government loosely supported by a number
of smaller parties.
The rise
of the Tea
Party, the election
of small government constitutional conservative office holders, such as Read more»
The success
of Tisei, Brown, and Bielat suggests that the migration
of small -
government Democrats to the Republican
Party, which occurred in the 1980s and 1990s in most parts
of the country, has finally reached Massachusetts, according to political observers.
My guess is that being a minority
government would actually be a net positive for Labour, relative to a tiny majority, because if Labour need to seek the support
of the
smaller parties on a case by case basis they can't do anything spectacularly unpopular or asinine.
A
small detail that's escaped the attention
of many is that both these
parties have agreed that their
government can't fall on a vote
of confidence unless 55 %
of MPs vote against them.
I believed in the need for
government to be disciplined in its management
of public money and deliver large savings; he had an ideological belief in a
small state, as well as a ruthless eye for
party advantage.
Coalition
government can be a good thing, but they must reflect the will
of the electorate who must be able to appropriately reward and punish both big and
small parties for their performance.
Today, Theresa May's Northern Ireland Secretary James Brokenshire is going to try to sneak a big favour to the DUP, the
small party now propping up May's
government in parliament — and in effect holding the future
of Britain, Ireland and Europe hostage.
In the era
of two -
party politics, the first past the post (FPTP) voting system, while unfair to
smaller parties, could be defended on the grounds that it produced strong single -
party governments.