Third -
party opinions practice is a branch of business law perhaps best explained, for those who are unfamiliar with it, by this excerpt from the 2007 Report on Lawyers» Opinions in Business Transactions [PDF], by the Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.:
All of the seven TOROG documents, along with some more explanation about third
party opinion practice, can be found on Slaw at slaw.ca / torogmemos.
Not exact matches
The institutional Republican
party should instead focus on giving candidates the tools to understand public
opinion, a set of best
practices for using the media to reach persuadable voters and state of the art
party organizations.
Despite most
opinion polls predicting that the Conservatives and Labour were neck and neck, the Conservatives secured a surprise victory after having won a clear lead over their rivals and incumbent Prime Minister David Cameron was able to form a majority single -
party government with a working majority of 12 (in
practice increased to 15 due to Sinn Féin's 4 MPs» abstention).
This is a somewhat academic exercise since it treats the whole country as a single constituency, when in
practice the transfers would take place seat by seat — but it does underline how closely matched the two largest
parties are in public
opinion.
It is thus not a surprise that many governments, political
parties, and various other groups deploy tactics to influence public
opinion on the internet, a
practice commonly referred to as trolling.»
In my
opinion, this product is ripe for integration with a third -
party practice - management platform.
The Toronto
Opinions Group consists of a group of lawyers, primarily practising with the Toronto offices of the larger Canadian law firms, with an interest in third
party (or transaction)
opinion practice.
For example, a casual perusal of the online legal research service Westlaw reveals that «mumbo jumbo» appears at least 251 times in judicial
opinions.8 «Jibber - jabber» shows up just seven times (although surprisingly used by
parties, rather than in statements from the court), while the more prosaic «gobbledygook» has 126 hits in the legal database.9 Believed to have been coined in 1944 by U.S. Rep. Maury Maverick of Texas, «gobbledygook» has been used by everyone from political figures referring to bureaucratic doublespeak (for example, President Ronald Reagan's stinging 1985 indictment of tax law revisions as «cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes designed for those with the power and influence to have high - priced legal and tax advisers») to judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers
practicing before them.
I and other adjudicators that I know will offer med - arb at the beginning of most hearings and tell the
parties that it is the general
practice to offer it in all proceedings (message: this is a routine suggestion and not because I have formed an
opinion on this case).
For some years now Slaw has acted as a repository for the memos and precedent
opinions of the Toronto Opinions Group (TOROG), an informal group of lawyers primarily practising with the Toronto offices of the larger Canadian law firms, with an interest in third party (or transaction) opinion p
opinions of the Toronto
Opinions Group (TOROG), an informal group of lawyers primarily practising with the Toronto offices of the larger Canadian law firms, with an interest in third party (or transaction) opinion p
Opinions Group (TOROG), an informal group of lawyers primarily practising with the Toronto offices of the larger Canadian law firms, with an interest in third
party (or transaction)
opinion practice.
Treat this response and all responses on this site just like you would drunks at a
party who got all their legal information from watching episodes of The
Practice, Boston Legal and Ally McBeal — but yet have lots of
opinions to share on legal questions nevertheless.
court of appeals under the Seventh Amendment to reverse a judgment entered on a verdict of a jury and direct judgment for the other
party, in conformity with a state
practice, are stated in the
opinion.
Secondly, the CBA
opinion suggests that the signing of the Collaborative
Practice Participation Agreement creates a contractual relationship with the opposing
party because the Participation Agreement requires a lawyer to withdraw from the case, should either
party choose to terminate the collaborative process, and pursue court intervention.
party select the agents I coach as that would mean I could not ensure they have core business beliefs that are necessary to operate an ethical real estate
practice in 2014 and beyond, which is the only way to succeed today and tomorrow, in my
opinion.
My clients were 2 Lawyers, one strongly involved with the Federal Conservative
party, and they made there
opinions known of TREB and their
practices to friends and associates alike.
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or
practices of the above referenced third -
party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims,
opinions, or representations contained therein.