Sentences with phrase «party policy fees»

Strict no party policy fees and eviction can apply for security call - outs (in response to the noisy neighbour hotline).

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

«Would County Executive Bellone and the Democrat party rather we return to the «extreme» liberal policies enacted by an all - Democrat State Legislature and their new state chairman, former Governor David Paterson who, in 2009 and 2010, brought hardworking taxpayers 124 different taxes and fees totaling $ 14 billion?

And there are three reasons why they are likely to attempt to stick to this position: they know there are dangers in policy U-turns (think Lib Dem commitments to oppose student fees); commitment to the renewal of Trident is entrenched in some parts of the party, even if key members of the leadership understand the downsides; and it would be seen as weakness if they succumbed to pressure from smaller parties with less credibility and electoral support.

We made a successful attempt to get social liberals elected to the party's Federal Policy Committee (FPC), where we were able to defeat an attempt by the leadership to drop the policy of scrapping university tuitionPolicy Committee (FPC), where we were able to defeat an attempt by the leadership to drop the policy of scrapping university tuitionpolicy of scrapping university tuition fees.

The most effective vote winning policies are ones which are popular on their own, but which also tell a bigger story about the party's values and are consistent with their other policies - opposing the Iraq war and top - up fees were both popular policies, but also clearly signalled to disillusioned Labour voters that the Lib Dems shared their values as a centre - left party of peace and public services.

The about - turn in Lib Dem policy follows hot on the heels of the sacrifice of the policy aim to abolish tuition fees, which caused significant discontent in the party.

Senior figures, including Mr Clegg and Danny Alexander, wanted to drop the policy of scrapping tuition fees but the party's campaign department ordered every candidate to sign the NUS pledge to «vote against any increase in fees in the next parliament».

Douglas Alexander told the Scottish Labour conference that his party should hold the Lib Dems to account for their role in implementing policies such as welfare reform and a rise in tuition fees.

There have been some successes of course, and Clegg appealed to voters not to judge his party on one failed policy — which must have been a reference to tuition fees — and to look to the «countless» policies that have worked out.

The party have backed their leader on the economy, on tuition fees, on energy, on defence policy.

He is seen as a key figure on the left of the party and his candidacy has been helped by the fact that he kept his hands clean of the coalition's most unpopular policies, voting against the bedroom tax and, crucially, higher tuition fees.

«Members out there are extremely concerned because we, as a party, still support the policy of moving towards the abolition of fees and I suspect that we will have something like that in our next manifesto,» Mr Farron said.

His apology for messing up his party's policy on student fees has gone down better than Gordon Brown's apology in 2010 for describing a Rochdale voter as a bigot.

Clegg told the Guardian on Saturday that a new era of fiscal tightening meant that, among other costly policies, he could not guarantee that his party's # 12bn pledge to scrap tuition fees would be in its next manifesto.

With the party divided between social and economic liberals, debates on nuclear power, the economy, tuition fees, green policy and taxation are unlikely to yield unanimous responses, resulting in internal division which may hinder the party's ability to project a clear and consistent message in the run up to 2015.

He insists the abolition of tuition fees remains Liberal Democrat policy, but in phasing the abolition over six years the party is simply responding to the new economic reality.

[41] The BBC reported that he had made several «gaffes» in his role as Shadow Chancellor and «in an interview he appeared not to know the rate of National Insurance paid by employers, and he was also reported to have clashed with his party leader over the policy of introducing a graduate tax to replace university tuition fees.

On to the Lib Dems, where Nick Clegg talked of «savage cuts», a mansion tax and some confusing recanting of flagship commitments such as scrapping tuition fees, as the parties sought to cut their policy cloth to the problem at hand.

UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced upcoming changes in student loan policies just a day before the Conservative Party Congress, and Nicky Morgan, chairwoman of the British Treasury Committee, confirmed that the government would review the student loan system and its impact on tuition fees and public finances.

Additional cleaning fees will be charged at the discretion of the owners Strictly No Party Policy Security Bond Required

Strict no party policy - fees and eviction can apply for security call - outs (in response to the noisy neighbour hotline).

In tax policy lingo, a fee is used to recoup a third party that is being harmed.

A fiduciary bond is similar to an insurance policy because it represents an arrangement where one party (the «surety») agrees, for a fee, to pay money or perform an obligation in the event the fiduciary (trustee, conservator, executor) fails to properly perform its duties.

The following are some examples where we may disclose your personal information: such disclosure is necessary to collect fees or disbursements; we contract with a third party to provide us with certain services such as archival file storage or insurance; (in such cases, we will use contractual or other means to ensure the third party service provider is bound by obligations regarding privacy which are consistent with this policy); or we engage expert witnesses or other law firms on your behalf.

England and many other European countries have what's termed a «loser pays» policy, whereby whomever is on the losing side of a legal action has to pay the legal fees of the prevailing party.

Most policies provide for payment of monetary damages as well as any costs, expenses, and attorney's fees which the plaintiff may also be entitled to as the prevailing party.

The bottom line is to have a sufficient insurance policy plan; otherwise, if uninsured, the injured parties and their insurance company can sue any parties necessary to collect the accident fees.

It can fund legal fees and damages awarded to the other party up to the amount specified in your policy.

Additionally, if the injured party sues you, you should be covered for what they might win in a court judgment as well as the attorney's fees and expenses, up to your policy limit.

Such fees are subject to the third party's pricing policies (including those with respect to exchange rates), which may differ from Marvel's pricing policies.

You agree to indemnify, defend and hold How - To Geek and its respective officers, directors, employees, members or representatives (and all successors and assigns of any of the foregoing), harmless from and against any claim or demand, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys» fees and disbursements, made by any third party in connection with or arising out of your use of the Services, your connection to the Services, your violation of the Terms or How - To Geek Privacy Policy, your violation of an applicable law, your submission, posting, transmission of User Content to the Services, and / or your violation of any rights of another we reserve the right, at our own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of such disputes, and in any event you will cooperate with us in asserting any available defenses.

Our regulatory and compliance services include analyzing federal and state requirements and restrictions (e.g., licensing / approvals, housing counseling, marketing, underwriting, disclosures, fee permissibility, cross-selling, UDAP / UDAAP, servicing, claims filing, and GNMA HMBS program), and developing and implementing reverse mortgage products strategies, including policies, procedures and internal controls for reverse mortgage lenders and servicers (including quality control plan drafting and revision), third - party risk management, and auditing of day - to - day operations.

With the ruling, the court becomes the third federal appellate court to reject a statement of policy issued in 2001 by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development that expands the definition of unearned fees to include charges that don't involve a third party.

Previously, some circuits had required a fee split with a third party in order for there to be a § 2607 (b) violation, while others had followed the HUD policy statement and prohibited unearned fees, even when a settlement - service fee was not split with a third party.

The Court rejected HUD's policy statement and ruled that a § 2607 (b) violation requires the payment of a portion of a settlement - service fee by the party collecting the fee to a third party who performed no services in exchange for the fee.

Feel free to massage it to suit your company's policy, don't be afraid to ask pertinent questions that would be a prudent way to protect your broker from sending out referral fees to parties who may not be entitled to.