I totally agree that a convention that is established quickly against a backdrop of
narrow party political point scoring in the run - up to the election will be a disaster.
Members of the public interviewed by the Hansard Society were not impressed with what they saw: 67 % of respondents said that there was «too
much party political point - scoring instead of answering the question» and 47 % thought PMQs «is too noisy and aggressive».
21.50 - Foreign secretary Philip Hammond praises Benn for «one of the truly great speeches made in this House,» before immediately attempting to score
party political points against Labour.
Our NHS is too important to make
cheap party political points about, so we once again call on the Tories and Plaid to stand up for patients rather than simply sitting back and shouting from the side - lines.»
«I take your point about the inherent fun
of party political point scoring, especially if the party I adhere to has scored the point, but it is essentially trivial by nature and, if endlessly repeated, deeply dispiriting and, for the majority of the public who aren't blindly loyal party tribalists, ultimately alienating.»
The number saying «there was too
much party political point - scoring instead of answering the question» was down from 67 % to 45 %
On Friday night Sir Malcolm Rifkind was authorised to attack Gordon Brown for making political appointments in order to
score party political points.
Ujnless you are claiming that homophobic reporting is OK if there are
party political points to be scored?
That's not
a party political point really — there's not an atom to choose between Balls, Miliband and Brown on the one hand and Osborne and Cameron on the other.
That isn't
a party political point, it's a grim reality.