Not exact matches
Tea
Party partisans have the same cultural agenda, but this incarnation of the Religious Right
proceeds by stealth, in this
case with riders to a budget bill - riders they know no Democratic president or Senate can ever accept.
«The
parties have mutually agreed not to
proceed with their
cases against each other.
An Accra High Court will today [Tuesday] hear a
case filed by the Progressive People's
Party (PPP) against the Electoral Commission (EC), seeking among other things, to restrain the EC from
proceeding with balloting for positions for presidential candidates ahead of the 2016 polls.
It shall be a routine use of records in this system to disclose them in proceedings before any court or adjudicative or administrative body before which DOT or any agency thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her individual capacity where DOT has agreed to represent the employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT determines that the
proceeding is likely to affect the United States, is a
party to the
proceeding or has an interest in such
proceeding, and DOT determines that use of such records is relevant and necessary in the
proceeding, provided, however, that in each
case, DOT determines that disclosure of the records in the
proceeding is a use of the information contained in the records that is compatible
with the purpose for which the records were collected.
The motions judge in SC v. NS concluded that the act of one lawyer for a client sharing the opposing
party's compelled discovery evidence — in this
case, documents —
with another lawyer representing the same client in another related
proceeding constitutes prohibited «use» of the evidence.
Where a
case has been unsuccessful, the court
proceeds to hold a mandatory
case management conference
with the
parties and their counsel (as another means of exploring the issues in dispute and possible resolution) before
proceeding to trial.
Should both you and our attorneys choose to
proceed, we will complete the necessary paperwork and immediately begin working on your
case - starting
with investigating the events that led to the accident, filing the official lawsuit and negotiating on your behalf
with insurance companies and the at - fault
party.
Principle 2: In any
proceeding, the
parties should ensure that steps taken in the discovery process are proportionate, taking into account (i) the nature and scope of the litigation, including the importance and complexity of the issues, interest and amounts at stake; (ii) the relevance of the available electronically stored information; (iii) its importance to the court's adjudication in a given
case; and (iv) the costs, burden and delay that may be imposed on the
parties to deal
with electronically stored information.
That quote will cover off all court appearances from first appearance to the trial or sentencing; it covers all letters and communications
with you, the Crown, experts; it covers all communications
with parties including witness preparation, and trial preparation; it covers the drafting of legal applications and arguments and the time spent researching relevant
case law; it also covers all costs associated
with the presenting your
case in a brief to the Crown as part of the plea bargaining process and / or the costs associated
with a trial if the matter
proceeds that way.
Any experienced motor accident attorney will know when to advise a client to
proceed with a personal injury
case or when more evidence is going to be required in order to establish the blame to another
party.
(2) A judge or
case management master may, on his or her own initiative, require the
parties to appear before him or her or to participate in a conference call to deal
with any matter arising in connection
with the
case management of the
proceeding, including a failure to comply
with an order or the rules.
(7) Within 30 days of receipt of the decision of the Divisional Court, any
party to the stated
case proceeding may apply to the Tribunal for a reconsideration of its original decision or order in accordance
with section 45.7.
45.6 (1) If the Tribunal makes a final decision or order in a
proceeding in which the Commission was a
party or an intervenor, and the Commission believes that the decision or order is not consistent
with a policy that has been approved by the Commission under section 30, the Commission may apply to the Tribunal to have the Tribunal state a
case to the Divisional Court.
In a recent
case involving the dismissal of a University of Ottawa professor, the beginning of the
proceeding was videotaped
with the agreement of all
parties.
These include
cases in which a provider communicated
with a third
party, prepared legal documents, or helped a client represent himself or herself; negotiated a settlement
with a third
party; represented a client in an administrative agency process or court
proceeding; and provided other services beyond legal advice.
In these
cases, there is a considerable downside if a large part of a court
proceeding or trial is spent dissecting the
parties» communication
with each other
with each side pointing out snide responses, intentional delays, foul language, aggressive tone and blaming each other for communication breakdowns.
These trials are subject to
case management, by the judge who will hear the trial, aimed at providing the
parties with that level of process which is proportionate to the importance and complexity of the issues in dispute, and ensuring that matters are ready to
proceed when scheduled.
This
case provides an important reminder to practitioners of the need to
proceed with caution when their clients — or another
party to the
case — may lack the mental capacity to enter into a negotiated settlement agreement.
Meanwhile a judge can name the
parties, their relatives and others involved in a
proceeding, and list all the physical and psychological health issues they are dealing
with that have been brought out in the
case.
The taxpayers argued that it was appropriate to deal
with these issues before the hearing, whereas the Crown argued that these issues could not be determined on a Rule 58 motion because, in this
case, the facts arose from a plea bargain rather than a determination by a court, the agreed facts did not address the GST liability of the corporation or the other individual's income tax liability, and the facts (and tax liability) of a criminal
proceeding would only prohibit the
parties from alleging a lower tax liability in a civil
proceeding.
While Kogan obtained the information on the initial 270,000 users legitimately and in accordance
with Facebook's rules, he then
proceeded to violate those rules by sharing them
with a third
party — in this
case, Cambridge Analytica.
(a) Each
party to any paternity or support
proceeding is required to file
with the tribunal as defined in s. 88.1011 (22) and State
Case Registry upon entry of an order, and to update as appropriate, information on location and identity of the
party, including social security number, residential and mailing addresses, telephone number, driver's license number, and name, address, and telephone number of employer.
If both spouses have reached an agreement on the terms and conditions of the divorce - how to divide assets and liabilities and custody and visitation time
with the children - the
parties can file a settlement agreement
with the court before the
case proceeds to the hearing stage.
In only one
case was a decision made that «good faith» negotiation had not occurred, and this involved a situation where the grantee had made little attempt to engage
with the native title
party and had made clear that it was participating in the RTN process only so that it could
proceed to arbitration by the Tribunal... these findings strongly suggest that grantee
parties have little to fear from the arbitration process... Unless they engage in behaviour that patently demonstrates the absence of an intention to engage in negotiation, they appear unlikely to be required to re-commence the RTN process
with a consequent delay in project development.
(a) In a
proceeding under this chapter, the court may at any time order either or both parents who owe a duty of support to a child to pay support to the other parent or, in the
case of both parents, to a third
party who has custody in accordance
with the child support guidelines schedule in s. 61.30.
Once signed, however, if a collaborative agreement can not be reached both attorneys must withdraw from the
case and the
parties can
proceed to litigation
with new counsel.
In this
case, negotiations
with one of the native title
parties had not
proceeded far past the conclusion of a preliminary protocol agreement on how the planned comprehensive negotiations were to be conducted.
However, in Collaborative Divorce
cases counsel and
parties will cooperate
with each other fully to prevent the necessity of any court filings while the collaborative
case proceeds.
Though the team and the
parties have faced some challenges
with the process, it has worked well, and has enabled the
case to
proceed using the Collaborative Process without requiring the spouse who lives in another country to travel to San Diego.