In some areas it also competes with newer companies like Apigee, but mostly MuleSoft's SaaS solution gives companies an option other than turning to third -
party systems integrators or hand coding connections between applications.
Not exact matches
Would it make any sense that
systems integrators and outsourcers be faced with potential uncapped liability for latent defects in third
party COTS software, when at the same time the relevant third
party licensors could not?
But if it were to be, we could end up in a nonsensical situation whereby
systems integrators and outsourcers could be liable as «sellers» for software that they obtained from third
party licensors, while such third
party licensors would at the same time continue not to be liable as «sellers», but only as licensors in accordance with their license agreement with the service provider or the customer.
As I discussed in my previous post, a robust partner ecosystem also includes the ability of third -
party software vendors and
system integrators to design, build, and support products that link the ELM platform and adjacent, complementary technologies.
Professional Summary: * Twenty (20) years of extensive experience in software QA testing in fast - paced environments including but not limited to collaborating with other QA testers, software developers, project managers, database administrators,
system engineers, project sponsors,
integrators and third
party vendors in the automotive, banking, finance, mortgage, real estate and retail industries.
Served as team lead for a cross-functional IT team, including 3rd
party external service providers (e.g. Consultants, Software Vendors,
Systems Integrators) to effectively implement high - quality solutions on time and within budget constraints.