Sentences with phrase «party takes a case to trial»
When a party takes a case to trial and does not get the result they had hoped for, they can sometimes appeal the lower court's decision to an appellate court to have the case reviewed.
https://www.indianainjuryblog.com/ Not exact matches
More specifically, the trial court might well have proscribed extrajudicial statements by any lawyer, party, witness, or court official which divulged prejudicial matters, such as the refusal of Sheppard to submit to interrogation or take any lie detector tests; any statement made by Sheppard to officials; the identity of prospective witnesses or their probable testimony; any belief in guilt or innocence; or like statements concerning the merits of the case.
We can help you obtain the financial recovery you deserve for your injuries by figuring out the cause of the accident, naming all responsible parties in your lawsuit, negotiating with insurers, and taking your case to trial if necessary.
In order to recover fair compensation for our clients who have suffered a personal injury, we believe that the insurance companies need to know that the lawyer representing the injured party is someone who is willing to take a case through trial.
An attorney from our firm can assist you with every aspect of your accident claim, from gathering evidence such as police reports and witness statements to prove that the other party was not only driving drunk but also caused your accident, to negotiating with the insurance company over the value of your claim and even taking your case to court for a full jury trial should this prove necessary.
With enough evidence that another party's negligence caused your injury, you may be able to reach a settlement or take your case to trial.
Whether your case may go to trial will depend largely upon the approach your personal injury attorney takes as well as the circumstances surrounding your case and whether the responsible party is willing to work with you to reach a fair resolution.
When there is absolutely no hope of compromise, and one party will not negotiate, the only choice is to take the case to trial.
However, if the parties don't reach a settlement, you need to have an attorney who is able and willing to take your case to trial and has a proven track record of success in court.
A real concern is that a judge, in looking to limit a party's expenditure on legal fees, may seek to cut down the steps required to take the case to trial or the evidence needed and impose an unworkable budget.
Although we are more than happy to settle cases prior to filing a lawsuit or taking a client's case to trial if the negligent party or their insurer is willing to pay full compensation for our client's injuries and financial losses, we are not afraid to file a lawsuit and take a case all the way through a jury trial to recover full compensation for our clients.
The second process is intended for cases in which both parties are represented by counsel and would apply to trials that are expected to take a week or more to conclude.
If a party is bound to lose, then they gain nothing by being able to take a case through to trial only to be defeated at that stage.
When a justice loses his temper at trial against one of the parties and issues a verbal judgement and reasons and takes off into chambers, just before the exit they will say that they «reserve the right to issue more fulsome written reasons» and oh my, oh my, you should see the «edits» in a case like this.
The way the parties and professionals interact with one another is radically different, the way information is gathered and assessed are different, and the way clients work together (with advice) to make solid decisions in their divorce that takes into account all of the legal, emotional, and financial elements in the divorce is a far cry from putting on a case at trial and asking the Judge to make all of the decisions.
Most highly - contested divorce cases settle before trial, after the parties have spent $ 20,000 to $ 40,000 in attorney fees, particularly if several months of argument takes place before a trial.
Unlike a trial, where each party puts on their entire case and the judge then issues a judgment after hearing all evidence, mediation allows for a continual give and take, with both parties having the ability to accommodate each other's concerns during the entire process.