Sentences with phrase «party to a transaction because»

Even without legal fiduciary obligations, it is unrealistic to think that a real estate licensee can adequately represent himself and the other party to a transaction because of the inherent conflicts of interest.

Not exact matches

This system relies on decentralized verification, which allows two parties to trust one another because a transaction or a ledger can not be successful unless independent users verify it.

Because of this, Blockchain technologies allow a nearly tamper - proof record to be created and allows individuals to transact peer to peer without having to put their trust in a third party to honestly facilitate their transactions.

While it's standard practice for them to sell some of that risk to third parties, it's nearly impossible to identify who exactly is on the hook because there are no rules requiring disclosure of all transactions.

Aside from the borrower, all parties involved in the securitization chain experienced healthy profits because they were able to sell each derivative at a slight premium, multiplied over a high volume of transactions each year.

Possibility that a bond's rating will be lowered because the issuer's financial condition, or the financial condition of a party to the financial transaction, deteriorates.

This type of lending provides a valuable service to both investors and borrowers because both parties benefit from the transaction.

Figuring out exactly what the family's economic incentives are is difficult because of numerous related party transactions, that make ACPT more valuable to them than any other buyer.

It argues that advice on the tax treatment affected the commercial arrangements between the parties on the related party transactions because the tax treatment of the non-compete payments would have affected the bargaining between the parties on the amounts to be attributed to the different entities.

For the most part, however, because enforcing debts against state governments is so difficult, transactions are structured as much as possible to prevent the need to enforce debts in that way through (1) legal limitations on governmental liability, (2) legislative budget rules requiring interest on debt and currently due principal payments to be made first, (3) third - party bonding of state and local governmental construction projects, (4) the creation of publicly owned corporations whose debts can only be collected out of the corporation's assets and revenues, and (5) avoidance of trade credit obligations by paying bills in cash.

You can not validate it because the employee used his personal Uber account and Uber would breach customer's privacy if they told you about a transaction you are not a party to.

Because everything happens within the portal and because documents are stored there, parties will be able to see the current status of the transaction for themselves (as appropriate, based on their roles and system permisBecause everything happens within the portal and because documents are stored there, parties will be able to see the current status of the transaction for themselves (as appropriate, based on their roles and system permisbecause documents are stored there, parties will be able to see the current status of the transaction for themselves (as appropriate, based on their roles and system permissions).

The final main concern is that the transaction inherently feels uncomfortable because a third party stands to gain financially when the insured passes away.

We can't eat a digital coin just as much as we can't light a pile of one dollar bills on fire to drive our car down the road, and because it's an ethereal, yet widely - agreed upon method of payment between two parties, there's no reason why a third - party company wouldn't be able to stand in as a trustworthy signatory in between transactions.

They also don't have to sacrifice privacy because no third party is involved in the transaction.

Despite the lack of a governing third party, blockchains are secure because the infrastructure and incentives built into the network make it virtually impossible to alter transactions after they are confirmed by the network.

How would you feel if your transaction records are accessible to the third party because all the transaction are recorded in a public ledger (that keeps the record of all your transaction)?

This is because the transactions involved deal with 2 - of - 2 multisig scripts, where both parties have to sign off on each transaction to make it valid, so they both can stay aware of all transactions made relevant to the channel they share without monitoring the blockchain.

In public blockchains, these properties are impossible because it may be possible to blacklist tokens from a certain party based on its transaction history.

Because of this, Blockchain technologies allow a nearly tamper - proof record to be created and allows individuals to transact peer to peer without having to put their trust in a third party to honestly facilitate their transactions.

When combined with CoinJoin, which is a method of obscuring the parties involved in a particular transaction, it becomes much more difficult for miners to potentially censor any transactions on the network because they don't have much information to go on in terms of the nature of each transaction.

In addition, TMS adds a level of security to the transaction because only the parties authorized for a particular part of a transaction will be able to view that information.

That's because unhappy parties to a transaction, usually buyers who've discovered a problem with the house after purchase, don't feel satisfied until they've sought damages.

It's therefore crucial to appoint a specialist conveyancing attorney with experience in this field, especially if the transaction is to be concluded at a time when the foreign party isn't in South Africa, because additional documentation is required and procedures when signing agreements can vary depending on the country in which they reside.

Notwithstanding the fact that title insurance exists to protect the parties to a real estate transaction, buyers and sellers still need to understand the complexities of title because they still can be harmed by a title defect, or «cloud on the title» after the closing.

In Florida, often times right before a residential real estate transaction is set to close the deal is derailed because of conflicting legal interests between the parties to the transaction (the seller and the buyer) and a third party with an interest in the property.

Perry decided to forgo conference calls with both parties because issues and disagreements outside of the transaction can cloud and interfere with rational decisionmaking and derail the conversation.

Because there are no standard practices yet, buyers often look to third parties in the transaction for toxic mold remediation.

Flopping involves fraud because the real estate transaction is supposed to be an «arms length transactions» — a transaction between independent and unrelated parties; there should be no collusion between the parties that results in unfairness or injustice to the seller.

Settlement agent and law firm commenters also explained that a separate seller's form would not be in the buyer's or seller's interest because many transactions require a reference to the other party's side of the RESPA settlement statement (for example, to see where seller - paid closing costs are applied).

Because the typical sale - leaseback usually must be structured to meet the specific needs and requirements of both parties, it may require more time and increased administrative costs than a conventional loan transaction.

Commenters also were concerned that a requirement to disclose the «actual terms» of the transactions before consummation would delay closings because creditors would not provide the Closing Disclosure until all parties have finalized their information.

Because Brookfield receives annual fees for overseeing the investment of third - party capital, it is not interested in a transaction which would require it to monetize its interest in GGP after only two years of collecting fees when compared with the opportunity to control a business forever and collect fees from the third - party capital it manages over many more years.