Sentences with phrase «party to a transaction without»

In accordance with the Commissioner's Rule, R4 -28-1101 (F), a licensee shall not accept compensation from or represent more than one party to a transaction without the prior written consent of all parties.

Not exact matches

«In uses that involve a financial transaction, it makes sense to use bitcoin or some other digital currency for the same reason — by doing so, transactions can be automated and guaranteed without recourse to third parties, such as a bank.»

Still in early development, BTC Swap is planned to facilitate a variety of what Middleton calls «Zero - Trust Digital Contracts,» which recreate financial functions in software code by matching offered and desired transactions between parties without the need for intermediary institutions.

Blockchain technology allows the immediate, secure transfer of funds anywhere in the world without a third party such as a bank to facilitate the transaction.

For example, two users are now able to exchange Zcash without sharing their identities, and the blockchain data confirms that a transaction took place, but doesn't show who the parties are or how much Zcash changed hands.

Blockchain technology in its simplest form allows transactions to occur between individuals and institutions without the need for a third party.

In the original whitepaper, Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned Bitcoin as a peer - to - peer version of electronic cash that would facilitate transactions without the oversight on a trustworthy, centralized party.

He told the New York Times in February, «Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly,» which suggests that he conducted substantial business on Trump's behalf without Trump's knowledge.

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

Because of this, Blockchain technologies allow a nearly tamper - proof record to be created and allows individuals to transact peer to peer without having to put their trust in a third party to honestly facilitate their transactions.

They define crypto - assets as peer - to - peer electronic transaction systems which allow payment by one party directly to another without an intermediary.

Yes, one could argue that other users in the block chain are third parties needed to complete transactions, but the fact of the matter is that they are not parasites that add extra layers of cost without adding any value.

[Confidentiality: Until the initial closing of the financing contemplated by this Memorandum of Terms, the existence and terms of this Memorandum of Terms shall not be disclosed to any third party without the consent of the Company and the lead investor (s), except as may be (i) reasonably required to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or (ii) required by law.]

Parties can then transact with one another, without having to broadcast the transactions over to the blockchain, therefore avoiding both delays and high transaction fees.

This method employs the same logic as blockchain technology, namely that trust can be established by the system without the need for third parties to verify actions and transactions.

Laser has been developed to offer this function of interoperability between blockchain by standardizing properties such as wallet numbers, it will be possible for users of one blockchain to make transactions with users of another blockchain without the use of a third - party exchange.

, decentralized exchanges enable peer - to - peer (P2P) crypto trading by promoting trustless transactions conducted without any third - party participation.

If we decide to reduce everything to party politics, it will be business as usual and no one should question why some of the most corrupt deals go through parliament without notice until the transactions begin to bite the nation.

deCODE's actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward - looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, (1) the impact of the announcement of its bankruptcy filing on deCODE's operations; (2) the ability of deCODE to maintain sufficient debtor - in - possession financing to fund its operations and the expenses of the Chapter 11 proceeding; (3) the ability of deCODE to obtain court approval of its motions in the Chapter 11 proceeding; (4) the outcome and timing of the proposed sale of deCODE's assets, including deCODE's ability to close a transaction with SagaInvestments, LLC or any other purchaser; (5) the uncertainty associated with motions by third parties in the bankruptcy proceeding; (6) deCODE's ability to obtain and maintain normal terms with vendors and service providers and contracts that are critical to its operation; and (7) other risks identified in deCODE's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the risk factors identified in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and any updates to those risk factors filed from time to time in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10 - Q or Current Reports on Form 8 - K.

In particular, we welcome the recommendation that the department should tighten the rules in the next version of the Academies Financial Handbook, expected in July 2018, to prevent academies from entering into related party transactions without approval from ESFA.

While we collect this type of information when you provide it to us, we do not share it with third parties for their marketing purposes without your consent, other than (1) subsidiaries of Author Solutions, (2) vendors or services providers of Author Solutions and (3) S&S in order to participate in a feature or complete a transaction through the website.

It is not unusual for the parties to the transaction to complete their roles without ever meeting face to face.

The fees charged by E * TRADE related to a transaction for the account of Customer are designed to offset third - party fees generally charged to E * TRADE in respect of such transactions, including without limitation any regulatory or transaction fee or tax, market center fee, clearing house fee or depository fee, assessed by any regulatory authority, self - regulatory organization, market center, clearing house, clearing agency or depository, including without limitation the SEC, FINRA, any national securities exchange or other market center, DTC and NSCC.

Thus, traders and investors using aggregate financial accounting numbers to derive superficial financial ratios (e.g. profit margin, return - on - equity) and valuation metrics (e.g. low price - to - earnings, low price - to - book) without understanding the underlying business model, the related - party transactions artificially inflating the aggregate financial numbers and the data generation process in the financial footnotes can be misled.

Thus, traders and investors using aggregate financial accounting numbers to derive superficial financial ratios (e.g. profit margin, return - on - equity) and valuation (e.g. low price - to - earnings, low price - to - book) without understanding the underlying business model, the related - party transactions artificially inflating the aggregate financial numbers and the data generation process in the financial footnotes can be misled.

When corporate counsel and transactional lawyers are in the throes of a transaction, they forward sensitive information via e-mails to various parties, such as auditors and bankers, without regard to privilege issues.

There will be times when litigants or opposite parties to a transaction may benefit from discussing issues without their lawyers present.»

In order to implement a change without the approval of all other classes of noteholder, transaction parties or a specific class of noteholders often seek to demonstrate that the «no material prejudice» or «manifest» exceptions apply.

In the context of a commercial transaction, common interest privilege allows parties to share privileged information (e.g., legal opinions) without waiving the privilege that otherwise attaches to that information, provided that:

The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement, and all acts and transactions pursuant hereto and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the [STATE], without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws.

Business transactions and trading relationships are the building blocks of supply chains and what they need to work — transparency, trust, transactions — can be programmed and tokenized without third - party intermediaries with blockchain.

Skype Bot will enable third - party authentication, which allows users to sign in right on a card, make transactions and bookings without leaving Skype.

The cherry on top is that transactions are conducted in a peer - to - peer method, without the need for a bank or third party to oversee it.

Simply put — the Blockchain is an unalterable public ledger where every single bitcoin transaction is recorded, enabling peer - to - peer payments to be made without the need for a bank or other third - party.

It refers to a form of digital currency which allows people to enter into transactions without having to involve the credit card issuers, banking bodies or other third parties.

Along the same lines, Deloitte's seventh Technology Trends report featured a short analysis by Brian Forde, Director of digital currency at MIT Media Lab, who emphasised the role of cryptocurrencies as facilitators of monetary and legal transactions without third parties and stated that «in fact, similar to the Internet, which exponentially increased communication by reducing cost and friction to near zero, cryptocurrencies have the potential to exponentially increase transactions for the same reasons.»

The defect is known as «transaction malleability» and it allows third parties to alter the hash of a fresh transaction without invalidating the signature.

eToro only accepts funds which are transferred from the users own credit card, any third party transaction is returned without depositing the amount to the account.

The parties can then conduct transactions without having to post them to the Bitcoin blockchain, avoiding delays and costs that result from recording those transactions each time.

One of the things that many people like about bitcoin is that it is «trustless,» meaning that peer - to - peer transactions can happen securely without mediation from a third party, like a bank.

Ripple includes a built - in «decentralized exchange» functionality that allows users to trade one currency in the Ripple network for another directly — that is, without involving any third parties to complete the transaction.

«Simply put - the blockchain is an unalterable public ledger where every single bitcoin transaction is recorded, enabling peer - to - peer payments to be made without the need for a bank or other third - party».

And in order for bitcoin (the currency) to succeed without a third party like a bank to mediate, verify, and manage transactions, the concept of a block chain ledger was developed alongside the currency as a way to verify and track transactions and prevent fraud.

The Lightning Network allows to make micropayments between two parties without a necessity to broadcast directly to the blockchain, which contributes to reducing transaction fees, increasing the speed of the whole payment process as well as enhancing privacy.

Zerocash permits anonymous transactions by harnessing a kind of zero - knowledge proof called a zk - SNARK, which allows two parties to provide each other with verified information without revealing their identities in the process.

This is because the transactions involved deal with 2 - of - 2 multisig scripts, where both parties have to sign off on each transaction to make it valid, so they both can stay aware of all transactions made relevant to the channel they share without monitoring the blockchain.

«So long as the chains can support the same cryptographic hash function, it is possible to make transactions across blockchains without trust in 3rd party custodians.»

Bitcoin made it possible to make financial transactions without the need to rely on banks or other third party brokers.

The developers argue that this system replicates many positive benefits of bitcoin - finalizing transactions against the ledger without requiring a trusted third party, while allowing the majority of such exchanges to take place off of the main blockchain, which currently capped at 1 MB of data per block.

Because of this, Blockchain technologies allow a nearly tamper - proof record to be created and allows individuals to transact peer to peer without having to put their trust in a third party to honestly facilitate their transactions.