She was sensitive to my personal circumstances and she dealt with the other
party to the proceedings with firmness and strength.
(3) If, under subsection (2), a bankruptcy trustee is
a party to proceedings with respect to the maintenance of a party to a de facto relationship, then, except with the leave of the court, the bankrupt party to the de facto relationship is not entitled to make a submission to the court in connection with any vested bankruptcy property in relation to the bankrupt party.
(3) If a bankruptcy trustee is
a party to proceedings with respect to the maintenance of a party to a marriage, then, except with the leave of the court, the bankrupt party to the marriage is not entitled to make a submission to the court in connection with any vested bankruptcy property in relation to the bankrupt party.
(6) If the trustee of a personal insolvency agreement is
a party to proceedings with respect to the maintenance of a party to a marriage, then, except with the leave of the court, the party to the marriage who is the debtor subject to the agreement is not entitled to make a submission to the court in connection with any property subject to the agreement.
(2) If the proceeds of crime authority intervenes, the authority is taken to be
a party to the proceedings with all the rights, duties and liabilities of a party.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected
to be incurred by United Technologies in connection
with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection
with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due
to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection
with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability
to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal
proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred
to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins
to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and
to satisfy the other conditions
to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise
to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins
to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins
to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million
to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related
to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating
to the value of the United Technologies» shares
to be issued in connection
with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated
with third
party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated
with merger - related litigation or appraisal
proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company,
to retain and hire key personnel.
«My office will continue
to fight for victims» best interests throughout the bankruptcy
proceedings, and engage
with all
parties, including The Weinstein Company and Lantern, in an ongoing effort
to advance the principles we set forward when we filed our complaint: ensuring that victims are compensated, employees are protected moving forward, and perpetrators and enablers of abuse are not unjustly enriched,» he said.
These risks and uncertainties include competition and other economic conditions including fragmentation of the media landscape and competition from other media alternatives; changes in advertising demand, circulation levels and audience shares; the Company's ability
to develop and grow its online businesses; the Company's reliance on revenue from printing and distributing third -
party publications; changes in newsprint prices; macroeconomic trends and conditions; the Company's ability
to adapt
to technological changes; the Company's ability
to realize benefits or synergies from acquisitions or divestitures or
to operate its businesses effectively following acquisitions or divestitures; the Company's success in implementing expense mitigation efforts; the Company's reliance on third -
party vendors for various services; adverse results from litigation, governmental investigations or tax - related
proceedings or audits; the Company's ability
to attract and retain employees; the Company's ability
to satisfy pension and other postretirement employee benefit obligations; changes in accounting standards; the effect of labor strikes, lockouts and labor negotiations; regulatory and judicial rulings; the Company's indebtedness and ability
to comply
with debt covenants applicable
to its debt facilities; the Company's ability
to satisfy future capital and liquidity requirements; the Company's ability
to access the credit and capital markets at the times and in the amounts needed and on acceptable terms; and other events beyond the Company's control that may result in unexpected adverse operating results.
Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related
to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the
parties may fail
to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the
parties may fail
to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions
to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW
to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives
to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability
to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability
to operate its business, return capital
to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal
proceedings, including any such
proceedings related
to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files
with the SEC.
- Post, link
to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link
to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link
to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal
proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link
to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated
to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link
to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link
to or otherwise publish any Messages
with recommendations
to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another
party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation
with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed
to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.
However, after private hearings took place between representatives from each respective
party, an inability
to reach a settlement has led
to further legal
proceedings taking place
with the tribunal starting on June 6.
(CNN)-- An anti-abortion Republican congressman from Tennessee, first elected in 2010
with support from tea
party activists, testified at divorce
proceedings in 2001 that he and his wife mutually agreed on her getting two abortions, according
to court transcripts released
to CNN Friday.
The discovery of William Baah's deep involvement
with the NPP comes at a time when members of Delta Force, a goon squad of the ruling
party, had overthrown court
proceedings and freed members of their group facing trial
with the state going through the motions
to sweep the case under the carpet.
The bill proposed the substitution of subsection 308 (2) which reads «the provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall not apply
to civil
proceedings against a person
to whom this section applies in his official capacity or
to civil or criminal
proceedings in which such a person is only a nominal
party»,
with a new section.
Republicans rarely side
with Democrats when the minority
party tries
to alter floor
proceedings.
Arbitration
proceedings are designed
to provide
parties with a fair hearing in a manner that is faster and less formal than court
proceedings.
It shall be a routine use of records in this system
to disclose them in
proceedings before any court or adjudicative or administrative body before which DOT or any agency thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her individual capacity where DOT has agreed
to represent the employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT determines that the proceeding is likely
to affect the United States, is a
party to the proceeding or has an interest in such proceeding, and DOT determines that use of such records is relevant and necessary in the proceeding, provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines that disclosure of the records in the proceeding is a use of the information contained in the records that is compatible
with the purpose for which the records were collected.
(a) Whenever the Attorney General receives a complaint in writing signed by an individual
to the effect that he is being deprived of or threatened
with the loss of his right
to the equal protection of the laws, on account of his race, color, religion, or national origin, by being denied equal utilization of any public facility which is owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of any State or subdivision thereof, other than a public school or public college as defined in section 401 of title IV hereof, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment,
to initiate and maintain appropriate legal
proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly progress of desegregation in public facilities, the Attorney General is authorized
to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such
parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of
proceedings instituted pursuant
to this section.
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent,
to the effect that he has been denied admission
to or not permitted
to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment,
to initiate and maintain appropriate legal
proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint
to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time
to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint,
to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such
parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of
proceedings instituted pursuant
to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States
to issue any order seeking
to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school
to another or one school district
to another in order
to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court
to insure compliance
with constitutional standards.
Risks and uncertainties include without limitation the effect of competitive and economic factors, and the Company's reaction
to those factors, on consumer and business buying decisions
with respect
to the Company's products; continued competitive pressures in the marketplace; the ability of the Company
to deliver
to the marketplace and stimulate customer demand for new programs, products, and technological innovations on a timely basis; the effect that product introductions and transitions, changes in product pricing or mix, and / or increases in component costs could have on the Company's gross margin; the inventory risk associated
with the Company's need
to order or commit
to order product components in advance of customer orders; the continued availability on acceptable terms, or at all, of certain components and services essential
to the Company's business currently obtained by the Company from sole or limited sources; the effect that the Company's dependency on manufacturing and logistics services provided by third
parties may have on the quality, quantity or cost of products manufactured or services rendered; risks associated
with the Company's international operations; the Company's reliance on third -
party intellectual property and digital content; the potential impact of a finding that the Company has infringed on the intellectual property rights of others; the Company's dependency on the performance of distributors, carriers and other resellers of the Company's products; the effect that product and service quality problems could have on the Company's sales and operating profits; the continued service and availability of key executives and employees; war, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters, and other circumstances that could disrupt supply, delivery, or demand of products; and unfavorable results of other legal
proceedings.
With the filing of its complaint, the German booksellers association is now formally a
party to the ongoing European antitrust
proceedings against Amazon.
C. No information or documents obtained by the means provided in this Section shall be divulged by the United States
to any person other than an authorized representative of the executive branch of the United States, except in the course of legal
proceedings to which the United States is a
party (including grand jury
proceedings), or for the purpose of securing compliance
with this Final Judgment, or as otherwise required by law.
These risks include, among others, general economic conditions, local real estate conditions, tenant financial health, the availability of capital
to finance planned growth, continued volatility and uncertainty in the credit markets and broader financial markets, property acquisitions and the timing of these acquisitions, charges for property impairments, and the outcome of legal
proceedings to which the company is a
party, as described in the company's filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(5) In an action brought against the creditor under sub-section (1) he shall be entitled, in accordance
with rules of court,
to have the supplier made a
party in the
proceedings.
But an amendment
to the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5), signed into law in August and taking effect Jan. 1, allows judges in divorce
proceedings to take the well - being of a companion animal into consideration when deciding
with which
party in the divorce the companion animal should end up.
a) These Terms of Use (and any dispute, controversy,
proceedings or claim of whatever nature arising out of or in any way relating
to them or their formation) and our Privacy Policy shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance
with English law and, for these purposes, the
parties irrevocably submit
to the exclusive jurisdiction of English courts.
You agree
to reimburse each Square Enix
Party (as defined in section 3.2 above) in full for the amount of any and all claims,
proceedings, actions, demands, damages, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses suffered or incurred by such Square Enix
Party, in each case as a result of or in connection
with: (a) any breach of any of your obligations, warranties, representations or undertakings under the Site Terms; and / or (b) any illegal use of your Membership or Account by any person (s).
Both cases dealt
with an ante-nuptial, or pre-nuptial, agreement and the weight which should be given
to it on division of the
parties» assets in matrimonial financial order
proceedings.
Key factors the study looked at in assigning grades were whether state law mandates the appointment of attorneys for children in dependency
proceedings; whether these attorneys represent the children in a client - directed manner; whether the representation continues throughout the case, including appeal; whether states provide attorneys
with specialized training; whether the child is given the legal status of a
party to the
proceedings; and whether rules pertaining
to confidentiality and immunity from liability apply
to attorneys representing these children.
In some cases, for example where contact has broken down or the child may be suffering from harm in connection
with the dispute it may be appropriate for the court
to be invited
to make the child a
party to the
proceedings pursuant
to Family Procedure Rules 2010, r. 16.4.
We have already covered the opinion handed down by Advocate General Cruz Villalón (see here), who suggested that the Court should allow Article 27 of the Charter in combination
with the Directive
to be applicable and
to exclude thus the application of the national norm that was contrary
to EU law despite the setting of
proceedings between private
parties.
With regard to procedures concerning a Protection Order, the party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply to the opposite party until the date for oral proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite pa
With regard
to procedures concerning a Protection Order, the
party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply
to the opposite
party until the date for oral
proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite
party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite pa
with regard
to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent
to the opposite
party.
a) Would there be a similar provision as under Scottish Legal Aid legislation (Section 18 (2) of the LEGAL AID (SCOTLAND) ACT 1986) «The liability of a legally assisted person under an award of expenses in any
proceedings shall not exceed the amount (if any) which in the opinion of the court of or tribunal making the award is a reasonable one for him
to pay, having regarding
to all the circumstances including the means of all
parties and their conduct in connection
with the dispute».
Article 19
With regard to procedures concerning a Protection Order, the party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply to the opposite party until the date for oral proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite pa
With regard
to procedures concerning a Protection Order, the
party may request the clerk of the court for the inspection or a copy of case records, the delivery of a transcript or an extract thereof, or the issuance of a certificate of matters concerning the case; provided, however, this shall not apply
to the opposite
party until the date for oral
proceedings or a hearing in the presence of the opposite
party with regard to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent to the opposite pa
with regard
to the petition for the protection order is designated or until the protection order has been sent
to the opposite
party.
For instance, in a 1968 case, a Swiss court refused
to issue an enforcement order on the grounds that the arbitral tribunal had not complied
with the agreement of the
parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral
proceedings» and instead conducted the arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001 case, the Italian Supreme Court enforced a first award but not a second award made
with respect
to the same dispute.
a) The financial recourses of all the
parties to the
proceedings, and b) Their conduct in connection
with the dispute
to which the
proceedings relate
Accordingly, no win no fee agreements in insolvency
proceedings will continue for the time being
to operate on a pre-LASPO Act basis
with any conditional fee agreement success fees and after the event insurance premiums remaining recoverable from the losing
party.
If you choose not
to follow the Protocol, you issue
proceedings and either your debtor is familiar
with the Protocol or instructs solicitors who are, then the following sanctions can be imposed by the court: - • An order staying the
proceedings which also requires compliance
with the Protocol; • An order that if you have not complied you pay the costs of the
proceedings or part of the costs of the other side even if you obtain judgment in your favour; • An order that those costs are paid on a more stringent basis known as an indemnity basis; • An order depriving the
party who is at fault of any entitlement
to interest or alternatively awarding interest at a reduced rate; • Depending on who is at fault the court can also order payment of a higher interest rate of up
to 10 % above base rate.
The initially promised affordability of the «unitary patent» and Unified Patent Court (UPC) especially for small and medium - sized enterprises (SMEs), which was repeated almost mantra - like throughout the EU legislative
proceedings as one reason why the reform was of utmost importance, ultimately turned out
to be pretty much the opposite,
with the level of representation costs
to be reimbursed by the losing
to the winning
party amounting
to up
to more than five times the sum which can currently be claimed in patent litigation
proceedings before the German courts (for more details on the cost situation created by the reform, cf. the article «Unitary patent and court system — A poisoned gift for SMEs» here).
This is a timetable for the
parties to deal
with various stages in the
proceedings, including exchanging witness statements, and it also gives a trial window for when the trial will take place.
Our work especially consists of explaining the Swiss liability law system
to the client or the corresponding lawyer abroad, assisting in providing evidence, drafting of damage calculations, conducting negotiations
with the opposite
party and, if necessary, representing our client in court
proceedings in Switzerland by our litigation department.
Part 1 of the Children and Adoption Act 2006, which came into force this week, gives the courts more flexible powers
to facilitate child contact, and requires individuals
party to proceedings to take part in activities that promote contact
with their children.
In brief, the contact activity directions will require a
party to proceedings to take part in an activity that promotes contact
with a child.
In PAP and non-PAP cases: notice of the existence of a funding arrangement should be communicated
to all other
parties as soon as possible; if
proceedings are started for limitation reasons
with bad pre-action manners, the
parties should seek
to agree
to apply
to the court for a stay while they take steps
to comply; and where
proceedings are started, the claimant should state in the claim form or particulars of claim whether they have complied
with the PD and any relevant PAP.
(1) No person shall --(a) take or attempt
to take in any court any photograph, or
with a view
to publication make or attempt
to make in any court any portrait or sketch, of any person, being a judge of the court or a juror or a witness in or a
party to any
proceedings before the court, whether civil or criminal; or (b) publish any photograph, portrait or sketch taken or made in contravention of the foregoing provisions of this section or any reproduction thereof; and if any person acts in contravention of this section he shall, on summary conviction, be liable in respect of each offence
to a fine not exceeding fifty pounds.
Thus, the EU may, either by way of request or upon the invitation of the Strasbourg Court, become a co-respondent along
with the respondent Member State (Article 3 (5)-RRB-, giving it the status of a «
party»
to the
proceedings.
The case is thus about whether Article 1111 - 3 Code du travail is compatible
with the right of workers»
to information and consultation under Article 27 Charter of Fundamental Rights as implemented by Directive 2002/14: Should Mr Laboubi and the union be able
to rely on EU law in legal
proceedings between private
parties to exclude the application of the French norm and enforce the right
to information and consultation?
In
proceedings to which the European Union is a co-respondent, if the Court of Justice of the European Union has not yet assessed the compatibility
with the Convention rights at issue of the provision of European Union law as under paragraph 2 of this Article, sufficient time shall be afforded for the Court of Justice of the European Union
to make such an assessment, and thereafter for the
parties to make observations
to the Court.
during the arbitration
proceedings, deliberately initiate or attempt
to initiate
with any member of the tribunal or
with any member of the LCIA Court any unilateral contact relating
to the arbitration or the
parties» dispute, which has not been disclosed in writing prior
to or shortly after the time of such contact
to all other
parties, all members of the tribunal and the registrar in accordance
with the LCIA Rules 2014, Art 13.4.
It found that s 23 and s 24 of MCA 2005 were governed by s 21 (1)
to state that these provisions are for the purpose of «adjusting the financial position of the
parties to a marriage and any children of the family in connection
with proceedings for divorce, nullity of marriage or judicial separation», and was clearly intended
to assist (living)
parties to the marriage.