Sentences with phrase «passage from justice»

It is one of the ironies of the development of the law in this area that the often quoted passage from Justice Brennan's judgment in Mabo) about the influence of international human rights law on the development of the common law (quoted above), was also quoted by Justice Olney in support of the proposition that the international obligation to provide innocent passage justified the limitation of the recognition of offshore native title to non-exclusive rights.

There are surely echoes of this in the following passage from Justice Breyer's opinion:

A fine, flowing rhythm is also evident in the following passage from Justice William Brennan's majority opinion in New York Times v. Sullivan, which broadened press freedom by raising the bar a public figure must clear to establish defamation.

Not exact matches

In fact, the first paragraph of the City of God alludes to the famous passage from the prophet Habakkuk, «the just shall live by faith,» and in book nineteen Augustine cites Habakkuk twice, most notably at a point where he links the just person (iustus) to the justice (iustitia) due God «who rules an obedient city according to his grace.»

Those characters in the Bible who invoked the word salvation used it to describe the passage from injustice to justice, like the Israelites» liberation from Egyptian bondage, Borg says.

So the girl's father read to her some passages from the later Hebrew prophets — such as «What does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?»

Against this I can plead that while my philosophical parti pris may betray me into distortion in this respect, it also enables me to do justice to something clearly glimpsed by Dix in the passage from The Shape of the Liturgy, to which I referred in my comments, as well as by Barth and by P. T. Forsyth.

It is tempting to pass this book off as propaganda, but no one should underestimate Carlson - Thies, who in 1992 began working, from his position at the Center for Public Justice, for the passage of Charitable Choice.

You shall not follow a multitude to do evil [all of this is in the nature of general admonition against damaging words: and now the same passage turns to formal legal consideration; nor shall you bear witness in a suit, turning aside after a multitude, so as to pervert justice; nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his suit [if formal false witness may not damage the innocent it must also refrain from endorsing the guilty]» (Exod.

As politicians and reporters alike were reeling from the news that four women had accused Democratic New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of physical and emotional abuse, New York Times justice reporter Katie Benner drew attention to one passage that really drives home why the prominent Trump critic survived as long as he did.

However, the passages Justice Huscroft cites here from DiTomaso speak of the declining importance of characterizing low level unskilled employees as deserving less notice because of the assumption they would have an easier time finding alternative employment.

In today's case Madam Justice Maisonville was quick to dismiss the impact of video that did not contradict the Plaintiff's evidence as can be seen from the following passage:

In coming to his decision on whether the employer had just cause to terminate the plaintiff's employment, the Honourable Mr. Justice Joseph Scime made reference to a number of passages concerning an employee's right to work in an environment free from sexual harassment.

I will comment on just one passage from the remainder of Justice Slatter's reasons.

Justice Kiteley cited the following passages from Mountain View,

``... notwithstanding the passage of some 16 years since the time of the brief solicitor - client relationship, the lack of recollection of that relationship by both D.G.C. and Sachs J. prior to the release of the Decision, and the independent concurrence of Frank J. and myself in the Decision authored by Sachs J., in my view prudence dictates that the Decision be set aside, this panel stand down from this matter, and a new panel be constituted by the Associate Chief Justice to re-hear the appeal.»

So, can't a reader can fairly infer (from the passage above) that Justice Myers isn't a fan of jury trials in the personal injury context.

The Croker Island case was the first judgment to analyse the nature and extent of native title rights over sea country.19 In the first instance, Justice Olney found that although native title rights did exist within the determination area, as a matter of law they were not exclusive in nature.20 This was due to the fact that the native title rights were affected by, and considered to yield to, the right of innocent passage and the common law right of the public to fish and navigate.21 The right of the claimants to use their traditional lands operated only to the «extent of the inconsistency ’22 and as such could not be utilised to prevent others from fishing or carrying out commercial activities in the area.