An analysis of covariance (adjusting for pre-existing literacy differences in September), for example, indicated significant classroom differences on
passage reading in May.
The passage reads in part: «The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. Person [a Democratic operative who Steele worked for] was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate # 1's [Trump's] campaign.»
From the way
his passage reads in his 1992 «Earth in the Balance» book about the memos, you'd think he was the one revealing all of this for the first time:
Not exact matches
The study's authors had 161 participants (who were almost exactly split between men and women) first
read a
passage in their normal voices to get baseline measures of their voices for things like loudness and pitch.
The timeline
in the book's
passage suggests they were
reading the already published story.»
If you
read to the end of Holder's letter, to the
passage where he says, «Were such an emergency to arise, I would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the president on the scope of his authority,» it becomes clear that, despite invoking Pearl Harbor and 9/11, even he isn't envisioning a response to an attack
in process, which would have to happen immediately.
Ferriss told us that he used to
read passages about compassion by Buddhist writers and think, «OK, if you're sitting
in a monastery, where your schedule is set and you have very few uncontrolled variables, that's fantastic that you can do loving / kindness meditation, but that's not the world I live
in.»
I'm
reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision)
in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting
passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»
Here is one of the
passages Anderson and Granados quoted
in Called to Love that made me realize I needed to
read this play.
In «With Her» Milosz speaks of hearing a passage from Scripture during Mass at St. Mary Magdalen in Berkeley: «A reading this Sunday from the Book of Wisdom / About how God has not made death / And does not rejoice in the annihilation of the living.&raqu
In «With Her» Milosz speaks of hearing a
passage from Scripture during Mass at St. Mary Magdalen
in Berkeley: «A reading this Sunday from the Book of Wisdom / About how God has not made death / And does not rejoice in the annihilation of the living.&raqu
in Berkeley: «A
reading this Sunday from the Book of Wisdom / About how God has not made death / And does not rejoice
in the annihilation of the living.&raqu
in the annihilation of the living.»
As someone born
in the early 50s, that
read Lord of the Rings
in my teens, I found that the Dark Tower series took LOTR place as a series I could
read over and over and each time I find some Christian themes but also beautifully written
passages that I simply want to stop and re-
read again.
Lent is about recommitting oneself to doing the difficult things
in life — vowing to set one's Starbuck's money for the homeless, for example, or
reading a
passage from the Bible each day or doing something that makes life a little better for others.
As an interesting note, some scribes
in the Middle Ages simply changed the
passage to
read, «as it is written
in the prophets..»
In the Office of
Readings for the day, we find this
passage by Thomas: The Cross exemplifies every virtue Why did the Son of God have to suffer for us?
In the Office of
Readings for the day, we find this
passage by Thomas:
Please share any favorite
passages of your own (or mention any
passages you think he
reads particularly well)
in the comments.
They are rarely used, and most people groan when you get to the genealogies of Scripture
in their Bible
reading, but they are often some of the
passages in the Bible which help defend it from the frequent attacks that are leveled against the Bible by it's critics.
«I would suggest you
read the Bible
in its entirety, not pick and chooses
passages out of context without relevance, that are suggested
reading from sleazy websites.»
If you are investing so much of your time on the Bible, I would suggest you
read the Bible
in its entirety, not pick and chooses
passages out of context without relevance, that are suggested
reading from sleazy websites.
The Cost of Discipleship If you just
read the
passage in its context.
Luke adds that he was «filled with the power of the Spirit» when he returned to Galilee, and that when he
read from the scroll of Isaiah
in the synagogue at Nazareth he began with the
passage that said, «The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor» (Luke 4:14 - 18).
He carried her
in, sat her before them,
read the
passage from James, and said, «I invoke you as my elders to carry out your biblical duty to my family.»
In addition we read two major christological pronouncements in the passage: «As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world» (v. 5), and «For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind» (v. 39
In addition we
read two major christological pronouncements
in the passage: «As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world» (v. 5), and «For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind» (v. 39
in the
passage: «As long as I am
in the world, I am the light of the world» (v. 5), and «For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind» (v. 39
in the world, I am the light of the world» (v. 5), and «For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind» (v. 39).
Accordingly, Ford believes that any
passage that can be
read without this doctrine should be
read in that way.
I found it easier to
read than Strongs
in that it gives
passages rather than a single verse or phrase.
I led my students
in silent Bible
reading and reflection to start each day, with little more guidance than
passage suggestions.
Reading familiar biblical
passages in their context is sometimes startling.
He had
read John 3:16 countless times
in his Christian life, but this time he noticed something different
in the well - known
passage, «God so loved the world.»
Although the
passage on page 88 about the «super-jective nature»
reads easily as implying the doctrine
in question, I agree that it may not have been intended to do so.
As I
read the
passages of scripture
in the lectionary for today, I found myself identifying most with the author of this psalm.
Part of studying and rightly dividing the word of truth includes
reading passages of scripture
in their context.
In these passages one can read between the lines Fredriksen's lively appreciation for Judaism in its modern manifestation
In these
passages one can
read between the lines Fredriksen's lively appreciation for Judaism
in its modern manifestation
in its modern manifestations.
«I have
read about the
passage we'll be studying
in several commentaries, and some of them see this as I do,» I replied.
So the
passage should
read more like this «Do not let anyone judge you
in eating or drinking.....
One
reads attentively,
in order to get the full benefit of the
passage.
This reminds me of a
passage I
read many years ago
in David J. Garrow's book, Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference:
A contextual
reading reads the
passage not
in our own context, but
in the context
in which it was written.
The
passage you're referring to, when
read in context, seems to be forbidding the marking of one's body
in ceremonial expiation for the dead.
Yet the context of Christian worship
in which a
passage from another scripture is
read may suggest a particular meaning or interpretation for the chosen
passage.
III It is impossible to
read this
passage of Ramban without thinking of Samuel Johnson's reflection on the secret horror of endings
in the last paper of his Idler series.
And go ahead and
read the full
passages IN CONTEXT at your own leisure, and you'll find that they have no other meaning.
There is nothing
in that
passage that should be
read as an approval of slavery.
Hopewell rejected that view and adamantly maintained,
in passages found
in nearly every chapter of Congregation, that a church's story, even when it recounts pedestrian and trivial activity, is the legend of God's plan, if only its sounds and signs can be heard and
read.
I think that most of us,
in reading through this
passage in the past, or
in hearing someone else teach on it, have thought that the sandals are the gospel.
bootyfunk your and idiot because that
passage in mathew 10 its a parrable he is trying to get people to realize that God needs to be the most important thing your life because with him you would not be period so to say that Jesus Christ the son of God is promoting volience is ridiculous, it tares me up that people like you take bit's and peices of the bible and make sound like you want it to if your going to
read the Christian hand book then
read it all do nt take stuff out of contence just to suit your life style your truly and always be a devoute Christian
From Heidi: Because Rachel is such a voice for women
in the blogosphere, I would love for you to address gender inequality
in the church and bring a better
reading to the
passages that have been used as weapons on women for generations.
This
reading, as we have noted, was Italianate, Ultramontane, highly emotional and frequently expressed
in passages of purple prose, which, as Wilkinson opines, occasionally topple over into «silliness».
In the Revised Standard Version (1946) this passage is set apart in small italic type, and the marginal note reads: «Other ancient authorities add 7:53 - 8:11 either here or at the end of this gospel or after Luke 21:38, with variations of the text.&raqu
In the Revised Standard Version (1946) this
passage is set apart
in small italic type, and the marginal note reads: «Other ancient authorities add 7:53 - 8:11 either here or at the end of this gospel or after Luke 21:38, with variations of the text.&raqu
in small italic type, and the marginal note
reads: «Other ancient authorities add 7:53 - 8:11 either here or at the end of this gospel or after Luke 21:38, with variations of the text.»
However the NIV inserts a word not
in the Greek, so 4:6
reads «this is why the Gospel was preached even to those who are now dead...» The translators admit the «now» is not
in the Greek but say that they put it there to make clear that the
passage doesn't refer to post mortem opportunity which they claim is ruled out by Hebrews 9:27 «it is appointed unto to man once to die and then comes judgement».
Just as St. Paul's letters gave early Christian commentators examples of how to interpret the Old Testament
in light of Christ, so the Church Fathers stretch our exegetical imagination by showing how other
passages can be
read in that way.