Each section of David and Goliath begins with
a passage from Scripture attesting to the ennobling power of weakness or the illusory boon of strength.
In «With Her» Milosz speaks of hearing
a passage from Scripture during Mass at St. Mary Magdalen in Berkeley: «A reading this Sunday from the Book of Wisdom / About how God has not made death / And does not rejoice in the annihilation of the living.»
I try to be aware of the faces of fear that creep into my days, and I cherish
these passages from scripture, which remind me of my humanity.
Yet the context of Christian worship in which
a passage from another scripture is read may suggest a particular meaning or interpretation for the chosen passage.
I do wonder a bit why you feel the need to back up everything you say with
a passage from Scripture.
When, in the course of his remarks, he intimated that some parts of the Scripture were more truth - containing than others and admonished his hearers to feed their souls upon the best of the spiritual food, James interrupted the Master, asking: «Would you be good enough, Master, to suggest to us how we may choose the better
passages from the Scriptures for our personal edification?»
There, for an entire week, they would meet in the morning, somebody would read
a passage from the Scripture, and then one of the priests would explain it, verse by verse, line by line.
Instead, most chapters focus on explaining and applying a single
passage from Scripture.
They sang his favorite hymns, prayed, shared favorite
passages from scripture.
T they would read
a passage from Scripture, just like Jesus did, but then, instead of explain it, they would just start quoting other teachers.
In consideration of recent public exposure concerning ped - ophiles (in most cases these are pederasts, i.e., active ho - mo - se - x-uals practicing an - al (or oral) i - nterc - ourse with teenagers) in the Church the following
passages from Scripture are referenced.
When a question is raised which for most people demands careful thought and responsible personal decision, people like that will very often simply quote
a passage from the Scriptures, frequently in no way directly relevant to the matter under discussion and when relevant only valuable in the context of another age and under other conditions than those which are ours today.
The practice in our churches of a person standing up in front of a group of people who sit passively in padded chairs for thirty minutes listening to a speech about a spiritual topic or
passage from Scripture is not necessarily wrong; it is just not a practice that can be found within Scripture.
Maybe not for every pastor who is out there, as many are not getting paid very well at all, but there are many more who are living quite well, and are using misused and abused
passages from Scripture to justify their lifestyle, and to guilt more and more needy people into giving sacrificially from their income.
Of course, the question that we must ask ourselves now is this: How do we help people understand that they are using
passages from Scripture out of context and why this is important (without sounding like a jerk)?
And now she is a saint, with
a passage from the scripture to prove the point.
we have, throughout our home many «words» and
passages from the Scriptures reminding us of God's goodness and the right < 3 attitude of gratitude.
Not exact matches
John 12:8 is the most common example: «You always have the poor with you...» Left out of that (mis) interpretation is the fact that Jesus is actually quoting a
passage from Jewish
Scripture that makes the opposite point: The continual existence of the poor serves as the fundamental reason for God's command to assist them, to give «liberally and ungrudgingly»: «Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.»
My aim is to take
scriptures at their most obvious, and I am not bending or breaking a single thing
from any
passage in Genesis (most of this is based on Rabbinic interpretations).
The
passages read were:
From Hebrew
Scripture — The Sh» ma.
They are rarely used, and most people groan when you get to the genealogies of
Scripture in their Bible reading, but they are often some of the
passages in the Bible which help defend it
from the frequent attacks that are leveled against the Bible by it's critics.
We will be looking at these
passages: Matthew 28:19 - 20, Mark 16:16; several
Scriptures on baptism
from the Book of Acts, Romans 6, Colossians 2:12, and 1 Peter 3:21.
Personally, I think that the context includes not only where in
Scripture the
passages are
from (including rhetorical function, narrative position, etc.) and the historical - cultural background, but also the context of the person using the quote.
So today, if a teacher begins to argue
from Scripture that Jesus was either not fully divine or fully human, we'll rehearse the biblical
passages and the traditional interpretations of those
passages that have stood the test of time.
The series will be similar to our Mutuality Week
from 2012, but will focus specifically on those frequently - cited
passages of
Scripture that instruct wives to submit to their husbands, slaves to submit to their masters, children to submit to their parents, and Christians to submit to one another (Ephesians 5:21 - 6:9, Colossians 3:12 - 4:6; 1 Peter 2:11 - 3:22).
Some of my most authentic sermons emerge
from a total immersion in the
scripture passage.
Nor is it appropriate to choose an opinion supported by a handful of texts at best and to discard an alternate view that has the support of many multiples more of
scripture passages from Genesis to Revelation.
If you compared my writing
from ten years ago with the writing I do today, I use different terminology, different approaches to proving my point, different vocabulary, and I even have different theological beliefs, supported by reading
passages of
Scripture in different ways, all to accomplish different goals in the minds and hearts of those who read.
From there, Andy goes through other key
passages and texts in
Scripture, proving that grace is the foundation of everything God does and says.
When they quote such a verse at us, we think that since it is
Scripture, it must mean what the world says it means, and so we refrain
from judging others, without ever looking up the
passage to see what it really says.
More than 20 religious leaders
from Catholic, Protestant, Jewish and Muslim backgrounds around Gainesville had the same Quran
passage read - along with Christian and Hebrew
scriptures — at their congregations over the weekend.
I presented on the scriptural evidence regarding homosexuality, of which Dugan wrote: «There is just one catch [to Gagnon's citation of
scripture texts
from Jesus]: not one of the
passages he quotes
from actually mentions gay relationships.»
These words
from Vatican I are fully supported by many
passages of
Scripture,
from the Book of Wisdom to the Letter to the Romans.
Aside
from the theological truth of the infinite forgiveness of God, numerous
Scripture passages clearly refute the idea that adultery is not unforgivable.
This idea runs counter to the regnant tradition of Western theology Philosophers of the medieval period, taking their hint
from Plato (Republic, Bk 2), Aristotle (Physics, Bk 8 and Metaphysics, Bk 12), and a few
passages of
Scripture (Num.
When the two despondent disciples on the road to Emmaus expressed to the stranger their bewilderment that such a powerful prophet as Jesus should have been condemned to death and be crucified, we are told that the risen Christ «began with Moses and all the prophets, and explained to them the
passages which referred to himself in every part of the
scriptures».6 The story implies that the Scriptures, when properly interpreted, made it clear that the Messiah was «bound to suffer thus before entering upon his glory» 7 When finally they recognized the identity of this stranger as they shared the evening meal before he vanished from their sight, they said to each other, «Did we not feel our hearts on fire as he talked with us on the road and explained the scriptures to
scriptures».6 The story implies that the
Scriptures, when properly interpreted, made it clear that the Messiah was «bound to suffer thus before entering upon his glory» 7 When finally they recognized the identity of this stranger as they shared the evening meal before he vanished from their sight, they said to each other, «Did we not feel our hearts on fire as he talked with us on the road and explained the scriptures to
Scriptures, when properly interpreted, made it clear that the Messiah was «bound to suffer thus before entering upon his glory» 7 When finally they recognized the identity of this stranger as they shared the evening meal before he vanished
from their sight, they said to each other, «Did we not feel our hearts on fire as he talked with us on the road and explained the
scriptures to
scriptures to us?»
Holding these «opposing» ideas and
passages of
Scripture in mind might prevent us
from becoming imbalanced or puffed up with arrogant pride.
Another
passage of
Scripture often cited by Catholic philosophers and theologians down through the ages is
from the opening chapter of St. Paul's Letter to the Romans:
There are dozens of
passages in
Scripture which shows that the gospel is not just a few ideas
from Romans, Galatians, and 1 Corinthians that people must believe to escape hell and go to heaven when they die.
The model of the corporate life in a
passage of
Scripture carries some of the same important dynamics that emerge
from the preaching model.
In other words, the teaching that the death of Christ was (a) for sin and (b) in accordance with the
scriptures was derived by both Mark and Paul
from the primitive church; the doctrine of the Atonement is not Paul's unique and distinctive contribution to Christian thought, for it is really pre-Pauline; further, it is not at all the central, cardinal doctrine in «Paulinism,» but a subsidiary one; (Indeed, it is a component one — it forms part of the doctrine of the new creation in Christ) finally, the conception of the way in which Christ's death becomes effective, as Paul conceived it, is peculiar to Paul and finds no trace in Mark or indeed elsewhere in the New Testament (Save in
passages demonstrable dependent on Paul)-- Paul thinks of it as a conquest of the demonic powers in the very hour of their greatest aggression and apparent triumph.
And if this Gospel we have cobbled together
from various
passages truly is the one most important message in the entire world, which people must know and believe in order to be born again, why didn't God deem it necessary to include this message all in one place, somewhere within the pages of
Scripture?
First, the average English translation of this text is fine, and second, I do not want readers of the English Bible to think that the only way they can see Jesus in the violent
passages of
Scripture is through creative translations
from the Greek and Hebrew.
Dietrich Ritschl suggests that the minister take part with a select group of laymen in the study of the
scripture passage from which the sermon will be preached the following Sunday.
With the
passage of time and more mature study of the nature of
scripture, as disclosed by the application of the modern historico - critical method of investigation, it is seen that the possible borrowing of Bible writers
from another source in no way affected its intrinsic worth, or even the belief that these writers were inspired in their writing.
Do we listen to that advice or do we completely ignore it and only accept what we want it to mean, not only
from that
passage but
from all the other contentious
passages in the
scriptures.
-- A few nights a week, I will read a short
passage of
Scripture at the dinner table (frequently
from Proverbs) and we will discuss it together as a family.
As any convert can attest, there are many ups - and - downs during the journey: Struggling with doctrine followed by insights
from magisterial
passages coupled with
Scripture, feeling still and alone followed by being overwhelmed by the presence of the saints before us, crying out to God for His presence and having Him answer in the Blessed Sacrament.
Some use these
passages to show that
Scripture is not inspired, as Paul seems to indicate that some of what he is writing is his own opinion only, and not
from God at all.
The
passage from second Peter can not be so easily concluded as to «not be talking about the writing of
scripture.»