Sentences with phrase «passages where»

There are always new and surprising full passages where you couldn't imagine another artist coming to the same decisions, which are invariably the right ones....

But there are passages where the player will get to know the different gang members, who gets along with others, who doesn't, who helps out and who does as little as possible.

Look particularly for passages where text switches suddenly to italic text.

We show only passages where the highlights of at least three distinct customers overlap, and we do not show which customers made those highlights.

Quickly your sympathies for Joe is heightened and from the beginning you are rooting for him, your empathy well and truly put into overdrive as the mental and physical damage he has experienced is put sharply into focus, and there is a real strength to Ames» writing in passages where Joe indulges in some critical self - examination of his own psyche.

And in passages where doll Scowler's conversations are unintelligible («Kt — kl, va, va, tk - tk, hr» wo - gep - gep - gep») or Marvin reverts to a «tuneless and belligerent» hum («hmmmm hm hm hmmmm»), Heyborne re-creates the sounds.

«There are passages where the player's on their own,» says Nelson.

Unfortunately, the film stumbles in its later passages where Roger's drug - addled past returns to haunt him.

There are superficial depictions of Crane struggling to get money so he could devote himself to writing poetry and many long passages where Franco reads Crane's poetry.

and although there are many problems that admit of no certain solution, e.g. the difficulty of reconciling passages where the kingdom is spoken of as present with those where it is spoken of as future, there is at least sufficient evidence for reconstructing the main lines of Jesus» authentic eschatological teaching.

I have found that when my prayers start to seem like I'm praying the same thing over and over, and I never know what to pray for, that the best thing to do is start praying Scripture Passages where prayers are recorded are especially helpful, like Eph 1:15 - 23; 3:14 - 21; John 17; the Psalms.

For reasons of space I can not quote extensively from the Scriptures in this book, but the reader is encouraged to read and dwell within the countless similar passages where the impossible breaks into and renews history, always by being received in hope.

That means they are the reason for those always distressing passages where God instructs the Jews to kill every living man, woman, child, and (sometimes) animal of many of the places they conquor.

Greater critical attention needs to be given to Turner's little - noted Thomist tendencies, apparent in passages where he posits, for example, a condition in which «the pure act - of - being is directly apprehended.»

Balthasar was far more concerned to base his theology upon Scripture and Tradition than was Rahner, and he was aware that the Gospels contain many passages where Our Lord himself implies not only that all may not necessarily be saved but that many won't be.

Despite its high estimate of womanhood, even the Book of Proverbs, in the many passages where it condemns harlotry, (Proverbs 2:16; 5:3 - 5; 7:5 - 27; 23:27.28.)

The two passages where this idea is mentioned seem to provide some clues.

There are long passages where the history of the people through a whole period is told as if it were the biography of an individual.

Could you cite the passages where Jesus tells us to not trust the government?

How and the hell is it that Christians can read passages where God allows pregnant women to be murdered, yet still claim abortion is wrong?

In sum, a compositional analysis of the passages where God is conceptualized by Whitehead in Process and Reality shows that, contrary to views commonly held by traditional and systematic interpreters, two concepts of God have been successively held by Whitehead during the composition of his Process and Reality.

Moreover, it will become clear that, for those passages where God is in fact described as the conceptual valuation of eternal objects, the «pattern of insertions» is not as clear as Ford contends it is.

The passages where Jesus mentions «weeping and gnashing of teeth» are not talking about hell, but about profound regret for a life poorly lived that some Christians will experience at the Judgment Seat of Christ (cf. Matt 8:12; 22:11 - 13).

Unlike any of the others, it takes quite different forms in the two passages where the Ten Commandments appear.

In light of the passages where the concept of a non-temporal God has been found, it would have been appropriate for Whitehead to declare that the non-temporal act of all - inclusive unfettered valuation is God, and to characterize it as the timeless source of all order, as he does in the text in sentences 1, 2 and 4.

Accordingly, in none of the great passages where the Old Testament wrestles with the problem of suffering does demonology play a significant part.

The consequence of this is evident in the passages where Sheol is pictured as utterly negative and the dead as utterly inactive and inane.

I told him that when I had looked it up in the New Testament, in all other passages where «fruit» was mentioned in terms of «bearing» it, it seemed to be talking character traits — about the fruits of the Holy Spirit from Galatians 5:22 - 23, like love, joy, peace, patience, etc..

Very well put, a lingering question is what to do about the passages where God / Jesus in the OT / Revelation are said to be the authors of violence.

Similar substitutions should be made in the passages where Jesus deals with the centurion of great faith (Matthew 8:5 — 13, Luke 7:1 — 9), where Peter brings the gospel to gentiles for the first time via the centurion Cornelius (Acts 10), and where the writer of Hebrews commends to his Christian audience the acts of force used by noble soldiers in the Old Testament (ch.

Such evidence is strongest in those passages where Jesus is clearly referring to his own death, as in the following:

The word homosexual was not even in our english bibles until 1946 and in the passages where it is used, the greek equivalents were NEVER used.

Although it is evident from Whitehead's language, here and in the several other passages where he refers to prehensions as «vectors,» that this is the analogy he intends, the meaning of «vector» in biology [the carrier of a microorganism) also provides an appropriate analogy.

Go read the bible and find passages where God instructs man to stone women to a bloody bath if they are accused of cheating on their husband.

They conveniently ignore passages where the people were admonished for wanting bigger government.

From other passages where Whitehead discusses the principle of relativity, we can safely infer that what all entities have in common — and thus what «entity», «being», «object», and «thing» connote in common — is their capacity to contribute determination to every actuality whose becoming finds those entities already existing (PR 366, 371, 392).

From HT: How do you interpret the passages where God seems to command things that are immoral?

Chapter 5 makes you cringe with the clear explanation of several Old Testament passages where Yahweh clearly seems to be calling for human sacrifice.

I am beginning a short series of posts on how to understand the Old Testament passages where God commands Israel to slaughter people.

I'm tired of showing passages where god murders babies and christians tell me I took it out of context.

Passages where Jesus gives authority to His disciples are popular texts for this idea (e.g., Matt 28:18, Luke 10:19).

Nevertheless we do glean two things from the passages where Satan is mentioned:

There are countless passages where those who choose not to believe are condemned to hell.

This provocative view is expressed in many biblical passages where God is cited as the direct cause of evil (Ex.

We know this because of the many passages where God gives an assessment of the way that people arrange their societies in Scripture.

In this work he commented one by one on all his writings, giving details about the date and circumstances of the work, noting places where he had changed his mind, pointing out passages where he got things wrong, for example where he had cited a biblical text from memory and not gotten it correct.

You can find passages where people have choice, but you can also find passages where they are destined and unable to choose.

If you read to the end of Holder's letter, to the passage where he says, «Were such an emergency to arise, I would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the president on the scope of his authority,» it becomes clear that, despite invoking Pearl Harbor and 9/11, even he isn't envisioning a response to an attack in process, which would have to happen immediately.

In Origin of Species there is a passage where Darwin expresses fear about the entire idea that he posits in the book and fear about the possibility of being held accountable for it.

I don't recall the passage where Jesus broke the law by running out on the field during sporting events waving stupid signs.