Sentences with phrase «passenger dummy»

In the full width rigid barrier test, readings from the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection of the chest.

However, readings from the rear passenger dummy indicated poor protection of the head and chest, with injury parameters for both body regions exceeding safe limits.

For the front passenger dummy, all critical body areas were well protected.

All injury measures recorded on the driver dummy were low, but forces recorded on the rear passenger dummy indicated the possibility of rib fractures or internal organ injuries.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, the pelvis of the rear passenger dummy slipped beneath the lap portion of the seatbelt.

In the side test, curtain - style airbags prevented the heads of driver and rear passenger dummies from contacting the intruding barrier.

With the optional side airbags, all four attachment points for the seat occupied by the rear passenger dummy completely dislodged.

These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structure ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests, as are rear passenger dummy injury and head protection ratings, because no changes were made affecting structure or rear seat occupants.

However, the pelvis of the rear passenger dummy slipped under the lap section of the seatbelt and protection of the pelvis was rated as poor.

The front passenger dummy can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.

Readings from the chest of the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection.

However, the pelvis of the rear passenger dummy slipped below the lap section of the seatbelt.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked well together to keep the passenger dummy's head from coming close to any stiff structure or outside objects that could cause injury.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was protected by the side airbag.

Instead of just a driver dummy, a passenger dummy also is seated in front.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was protected by the side airbags.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was protected by the side airbag (the C - pillar trim was dislodged by the inflating airbag and does not pose an injury risk).

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the window glass and window sill of the rear passenger door and by the pillar behind the door.

In the side impact test for both models, measures taken from both the driver dummy and the passenger dummy seated in the rear seat indicated low risk of significant injuries in a real - world crash like this one.

Protection of the rear passenger dummy was also good or adequate.

In the first test, the side curtain airbag did not deploy properly, and the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the window sill of the rear door.

«In the side test of the Neon, the barrier hit the heads of both the driver and rear passenger dummies,» Lund points out.

Plus the rear passenger dummy's head was struck by the windowsill and the pillar behind the rear door.

In the test without the head protection airbag, the heads of the driver and rear passenger dummies were struck by the hood of the pickup truck.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the window trim, which was dislodged during the crash (dummy removed from van to show the impact point).

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the window sill and window frame of the rear passenger door and the pillar behind the door.

Although the overall side crash protection still would have been rated good, with low risk of injuries to both driver and rear passenger dummies, Nissan engineers were concerned about the interference with the deployment of the side curtain airbag.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the interior side trim.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, protection of the head, neck and chest of the rear passenger dummy was rated as poor and no points were scored for this dummy.

Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas in this test.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated poor protection for this part of the body and protection of the head was rated as marginal, based on measured decelerations.

Smeared red and yellow greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was protected by the side airbag in the Institute's test.

For the rear passenger dummy, a combination of chest compression and high shoulder belt load indicated poor chest protection, and that of the neck was rated as marginal.

The door sill was pushed in laterally 12 cm toward the passenger dummy.

Protection was good for all critical body areas of the passenger dummy in this test.

Chest protection for the rear passenger dummy was adequate and that of the driver dummy was again marginal.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door and the window sill of the rear door.

However, measurement of compression indicated poor protection for the chest of the rear passenger dummy and head decelerations demonstrated weak head protection.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the window frame and sill of the rear passenger door.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was protected by the side airbag in the second test.

Driver chest protection was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression In the full - width rigid barrier frontal impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger dummies was rated as good, except for the chest, protection of which was adequate.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door and the window glass and window sill of the rear door.

In the tests of the Camry and Accord with side airbags, most injury measures for the front and rear passenger dummies were low.

Likewise for the rear passenger dummy: poor protection of the head resulted in all points being lost.

In that test, maximum points were scored for the protection of the passenger dummy and only a fraction of a point was lost for the driver.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was hit by the pillar behind the rear passenger door (second test shown).

In the full - width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was good for all critical body areas and, for the rear passenger dummy, it was good apart from the chest, protection of which was adequate.

Protection of the front passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas.

Smeared greasepaint shows where the rear passenger dummy's head was protected by the side airbag (the blue strip is a kind of liner for the airbag).