Sentences with phrase «past temperature projections»

Not exact matches

Our record is also of interest to climate policy developments, because it opens the door to detailed comparisons between past atmospheric CO2 concentrations, global temperatures, and sea levels, which has enormous value to long - term future climate projections.»

«A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea - level rise» «Testing the robustness of semi-empirical sea level projections» «Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st - century sea - level rise» «Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea level rise» «Global sea level rise scenarios for the United States National Climate Assessment» «Reconstructing sea level from paleo and projected temperatures 200 to 2100AD» «Global sea level linked to global temperature» «Upper limit for sea level projections by 2100»

It should say something like «Although CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere have risen in line with earlier projections, globally - averaged temperature observations have risen less than projected and are currently at or below the low end of the range in past IPCC assessments.»

Based on our inferred close relationship between past and future temperature evolution, our study suggests that paleo - climatic data can help to reduce uncertainty in future climate projections.

Research Highlights Summary from Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Global Temperature Projections 100 ° days: Past and Future

The simulations were shown to reproduce the observed strong reduction in past crop yields induced by high temperatures, thereby confirming that they capture one main mechanism for future projections.

1)... to argue that the observed global mean temperature anomalies of the past decade falsifies the model projections of global mean temperature change, as contrarians have been fond of claiming, is clearly wrong.

Arctic ice melt is accelerating even faster than the most recent projections — temperatures over the past six years are the highest since measurements began in 1880.

I'm afraid that much of the strength of the reaction to your questions was based on past experiences - I can not count how many times someone has commented here and on other climate blogs claiming despite the evidence that mismatches between specific projections and observed temperatures somehow invalidate all climate modeling, despite the projected emissions not matching actuals.

One element of a compromise that I would suggest is that when referring to past temperatures and future predictions / projections that the term «estimated» be used before the number of the temperature being discussed.

Dana Nuccitelli presented a talk on climate model accuracy — comparing past global temperature projections to observations, and effectively debunking associated myths.

«Data from the past helped calibrate our model, and will improve sea level rise projections under scenarios of future temperature increases,» says Rahmstorf.

Let's look in more detail at the paper's key figure, the one that looks at past and (forecast) future global temperatures, «Hindcast / forecast decadal variations in global mean temperature, as compared with observations and standard climate model projections» (click to enlarge)

The primary reason to ignore chicken little forecasts of thermageddon is the warmists» unquestioned acceptance of WAGs as to past «global average temperatures», which is matched only by their blind belief in the projections of GCMs as to future GATs.

With a growing perspective among editors and reviewers that climate papers must present conclusionary temperature trends, projections, and reconstructions in order to proceed past an initial «fatal flaw» analsys, important contributions to the literature may never make it to the light of day.