As a result of online e-commerce marketplaces, such as Amazon, eBay, and Alibaba, beginning to enforce design patent rights asserted by design patent holders without the benefit of any type of judicial or administrative review, allegedly infringing products are being taken down from the online marketplace without formally engaging in design
patent claim construction.
Shubha Ghosh provided commentary on Teva v. Sandoz, the recent Supreme Court recent decision on
patent claim construction, for a January post on the blog PatentlyO.
While some companies having robust design portfolios stand to benefit from the establishment of design patent take down procedures, many companies facing allegations of infringement may nonetheless find themselves swept up in a nascent process that is being implemented within forums that are ill - suited for final arbitration regarding design
patent claim construction.
Tagged Daubert, Markman Rulings, patent,
Patent Claim Construction, patent damages, patent litigation, pittsburgh intellectual property litigation, Pittsburgh patent lawyers, texas patent verdicts
Tagged en banc, Federal Circuit, intellectual property litigation, patent,
Patent Claim Construction, patent litigation, pittsburgh intellectual property litigation, pittsburgh patent litigation
Apple notes (as I did in my post on the amicus briefs) that the 37 law professors supporting Samsung are the only group of amici to side with Samsung on design
patent claim construction.
Anderson, Jonas and Menell, Peter S., From De Novo Review to Informal Deference: An Historical, Empirical, and Normative Analysis of the Standard of Appellate Review for
Patent Claim Construction, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper (September 20, 2012)
On January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first patent decision of the current term, rejecting the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's long - standing practice of reviewing district court
patent claim construction rulings, including subsidiary findings, without deference.
Patent claim construction.
Not exact matches
The week in IP — PTAB
claim construction change Burberry sues Target ITC on course for record Broadcom / Toyota
patent dispute Dr Dre at the TTAB
In Nova Chemicals Corporation v. Dow Chemical Company, 2016 FCA 216, the court said that a judge is «nevertheless entitled to some leeway» on
claim construction because the trial judge is better placed to understand the intricacies of the
patent and its technology.
Want to see damages only in
patent cases that have reached a
claim construction hearing?
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has since released new guidelines for a purposive
construction of
patent claims, as well as a new examination practice for computer - implemented inventions.
Patent litigation, including managing electronic discovery efforts, working with expert witnesses to draft invalidity and non-infringement reports, drafting
claim construction briefs and motions for summary judgment, and pre-trial preparations.
On Friday, it didn't take long (after this blog was first to highlight the issue because I had been following the «Posner case» in detail over the years) before the appeals court ruling affirming Judge Posner's
claim construction of the» 647
patent was discussed everywhere, and that was good.
Now she has a problem, and the only reasonable solution I can see is that the» 647
patent be withdrawn from the current case because Apple's infringement argument and its damages
claim, both erroneously supported by Judge Koh, were based on a wrong
claim construction.
But there can be no confusion about the fact that Judge Posner himself had outlined a workaround for the» 647
patent based on his
claim construction, which now also governs the California case:
I am a
patent litigator, and I have participated in dozens of Markman or
claim construction hearings both as a lawyer and as a litigation consultant.
Patent Tutorial, Markman Hearings, Litigation Graphics,
Patent Litigation, Judges,
Claim Construction, ITC
But he did recognize that prosecution history doesn't have much of a bearing on
claim construction in Germany — which is exactly why I believe Samsung decided to assert this particular
patent in Germany and not in the United States.
Prior to the Federal Circuit
claim construction ruling, I thought it might take a long time to find out how strong that
patent is.
Obtained a positive
claim construction ruling for the
patent holder as well as an order excluding evidence of certain prior art from the defendants.
Ultimately, it is unclear whether the different
claim construction standards applied will prove substantial enough to prevent issue preclusion in later district court
patent infringement actions.
e-Briefs,
Patent Tutorial, Markman Hearings, Arbitration / Mediation, Presentation Graphics, Advocacy Graphics, Judges,
Claim Construction, Depositions, White Collar, Class Action
Obtained a positive
claim construction ruling for Ford during an inter partes review proceeding before the
Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB») that found an express disclaimer in the prosecution history of the patent - in -
Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB») that found an express disclaimer in the prosecution history of the
patent - in -
patent - in - suit.
Represented mobile phone industry leader, strategizing
claim construction and
patent noninfringement positions in an ITC action involving semiconductor packaging.
Patent Tutorial, Markman Hearings, Trial Graphics, Litigation Graphics, Trial Presentation, Trial Consulting, Animation,
Patent Litigation, PowerPoint,
Claim Construction, Information Design
If the new standard causes the Federal Circuit's relatively high reversal rate on
claim construction to decrease, parties may go to greater lengths to avoid litigation in forums with relatively inexperienced judges or uneven track records in determining
patent cases.
District Court amended its original
claim construction order based on the PTAB's ruling and granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Ford on the ground that the express disclaimer prevented the
patent - in - suit from covering Ford's vehicles.
Breyer noted that although Markman gives the district judge sole responsibility to construe a
patent claim, it recognizes that
claim construction will require subsidiary factual findings.
In addition, although the Gunn Court noted that state court interpretations of the
Patent Act would not be binding on federal courts, [10] final state court judgments determining patent issues, such as validity, infringement, or claim construction, may well be binding on a patentee in subsequent litigation involving the same or related pa
Patent Act would not be binding on federal courts, [10] final state court judgments determining
patent issues, such as validity, infringement, or claim construction, may well be binding on a patentee in subsequent litigation involving the same or related pa
patent issues, such as validity, infringement, or
claim construction, may well be binding on a patentee in subsequent litigation involving the same or related
patents.
The
construction of disputed
claim terms often determines whether an accused product infringes the
patent and can be pivotal to invalidity defenses.
But
claim construction proceedings may include voluminous evidence concerning matters outside the
patent document and prosecution history.
2005)(en banc), it is likely to introduce important strategic issues in
patent cases, especially relating to conduct of
claim construction proceedings.
A technology tutorial and
claim construction hearing for the
patents asserted in the second complaint will be held (if the court approves this stipulation) on October 10, 2013.
Judge Newman filed a separate dissent, pointing out that all amicus briefs submitted in the case argued against different standards in PTAB and district court proceedings, stressing the concern that different
claim constructions would lead to uncertainty a lack of predictability in
patent rights.
In the ensuing trial, the PTAB construed the
claims by giving them the «broadest reasonable
construction in light of the specification of the
patent in which it appears.»
Mr. Kaplan has successfully represented various insurers in a multitude of complex coverage disputes, including disputes stemming from
claims for directors and officers liability, professional liability, environmental contamination, disparagement of competitor's products, violation of false
claims act statutes,
construction defects, trademark, copyright and
patent infringement, and violation of constitutional rights.
It should be noted that the proper
claim construction standard for PTAB trial proceedings is a subject of
patent reform bills pending in Congress, which would direct the USPTO to apply the same standard as that used in federal court litigation.
For reasons I explained in my previous post, the» 647
claim construction from the «Posner case» was accepted by Apple last week when it brought a motion for a remand of a reexamination procedure jointly with the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
The Court seemed most concerned by the procedural impact of
claim construction in PTAB trials, and the potential effect on district court litigation concerning the same
patents.
The Supreme Court spent the vast majority of the argument questioning counsel about the BRI
claim construction standard, and discussed the
patent owner's ability to appeal PTAB institution decisions only briefly.
And Apple itself accepted that
construction on May 14 when it moved, jointly with the United States
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), for a remand of the reexamination of the broadest» 647
claims.
Under that
claim construction, the
patent isn't nearly as valuable as Apple is
claiming in the California Samsung case.
A
claim construction and
patent law blog with news of recent court rulings on the topics.
[239] This case highlights a potential risk in taking a simpler approach to
claim construction by ignoring extrinsic evidence, such as the prosecution history of the
patent in suit.
There, [the patentee] would likely not have been allowed to argue a
claim construction that attempts to recapture ground conceded during prosecution of the
patent application to avoid prior art.
In contrast in Canada, the Supreme Court in 2000 held that «extrinsic» material, including the prosecution history of the
patent, was not to be considered for
claim construction, i.e. determining what the words of the
patent mean.
If you had a pretty good, but still losing
claim construction argument at the district court, you have an argument to the Federal Circuit that you had a reasonable believe you didn't infringe the
patent because of it.
defensive defeats (proving Android's wide - scale infringement of third - party
patents): item 4 (
claim construction in second Apple v. Samsung case) and item 12 (German appeals court affirms Microsoft's multi-part SMS injunction)