The period starts with either the market authorization date (where a patent was previously issued) or
the patent issue date (if market approval was previously obtained).
Not exact matches
Biddington's provides a list of
patent numbers cross-referenced with the
dates they were
issued to help in determining the age of antiques and collectibles.
116 (3) The certificate's term is calculated by subtracting five years from the period beginning on the filing
date of the application for the
patent and ending on the day on which the authorization for sale set out in the certificate is
issued, but in any event is for a maximum of two years.
The review recognised that this was subject to the important
issue of translations which has bogged down the proposal to
date and that innovators may consequently have to pay for translations where a
patent was registered in other Community languages.
This session will review the biosimilars litigation to
date; analyze the substantive
issues; and discuss important questions about the BPCIA
patent challenge procedures that have yet to be resolved.
The ONCA held it was open to the motions judge to accept «essentially unrefuted» expert evidence that in the hypothetical but - for world Health Canada would have
issued Apotex its Notice of Compliance as of its
patent hold
date and that Health Canada would not have suspended or revoked the Notice of Compliance in the absence of exceptional circumstances.
April 2002 Roundtable: Special Risk Management
Issues for
Patent Law Firms — Panel Presentation
Date: April 24, 2002 More information and audio presentation are available.
The problem the D'677
patent faces here is that the USPTO has determined (for now) that this
patent «is not entitled to benefit of the filing
date» of two previous Apple design
patent applications because the design at
issue was not disclosed in those earlier applications.
The
date for sufficiency may be a rare
issue — the Novartis
patent was an Old Act
patent (filed before 1989 and therefore only published at the time of issuance which was 10 years after filing).
Sterling Lumber Company v. Harrison, 2010 FCA 21, was a rare instance where the court granted summary judgment on
issues of
patent validity based on an admission during discovery of sales made prior to the relevant
date that embodied the claims of the
patent at
issue.
At
issue are several
patents, at least one of which which
dates back to 1998.