Sentences with phrase «patent jury trial»

Won patent jury trial against LG Electronics, obtaining favorable infringement and invalidity verdicts as to all asserted claims, resulting in a 2016 Top 50 Jury Verdict in Texas.
There is no substitute for well - crafted graphics in a patent jury trial involving technology.

Not exact matches

When Oracle v. Google went to trial the first time, in 2012, the jury found in favor of Google on every patent claim.
Mr. Stellabotte is a registered patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in federal and state trial and appellate courts, including case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and jury trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.
Given that there is only a limited amount of work left to do in order to adjudicate the withdrawn patents, I think there's a pretty good chance that these patents will go to trial, be it a bench trial or a jury trial, in 2013.
Instead, this jury just confirmed what the Wall Street Journal's Apple reporter Daisuke Wakabayashi said on Twitter yesterday: «With a jury of patent / tech novices, trial comes down to which lawyer can tell the better story.»
As America's most - cited judge, Judge Richard Posner, put it last year, «Judges have difficulty understanding modern technology and jurors have even greater difficulty, yet patent plaintiffs tend to request trial by jury because they believe that jurors tend to favor patentees, believing that they must be worthy inventors defending the fruits of their invention against copycats -LSB-...]».
After a jury's finding of patent infringement, the court rules on a number of pre -(damages)- trial motions, with 3 such rulings of interest.
During a trial, I have a limited amount of time to teach the jury the technology that is patented and how an accused device would infringe (or avoid infringement) of the patent claim at issue.
Houston patent trial lawyer Demetrios Anaipakos of Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing P.C., or AZA, has won a $ 9 million federal jury verdict for Texas - based patent licensing company Saint Lawrence Communications LLC against technology heavyweight Motorola Mobility LLC for patent infringement.
We have litigated a wide variety of jury cases, bench trials, Federal Circuit appeals and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office interferences and other proceedings across a wide range of technical areas, including:
Arbitration & Mediation Attorneys Needed Bankruptcy Boating Books Careers Counselors Disposition / Court Reporters Document Examination Economic Damages Education Expert Witnesses Accidents Advertising Aviation Banking / Finance Computers Construction Document Examination Economic Damages Employment Discrimination Engineering Medical General Medical Specialty Anesthesia Chiropractic Drug Emergency & Trauma Hospital Director Neurologist Nursing Home Oncology Odontology Orthopedics Pharmacology Psychiatry Surgery Toxicology Other Financial Services Heir Tracers Horses Equine Appraisers Insurance Intellectual Property Jury & Trial Consultants Legal Malpractice Marketing Office Products Other Real Estate Real Estate Finance Security Trademarks and Patents Training Web Development
Trial Graphics, Litigation Graphics, Trial Presentation, Trial Consulting, Juries, Patent Litigation, Science, Psychology, Checklists, Medical Malpractice
After a four day jury trial, DynaEnergetics obtained a complete defense verdict, including findings of noninfringement and three different bases of invalidity for each of the patent claims.
After a five - day jury trial, the validity of a patent covering the industry transforming paperboard container for twelve - pack beverages was upheld and found infringed by the competitor.
As a result, our attorneys have deep and broad expertise in all phases of patent litigation from pre-litigation counseling through Markman hearings, dispositive motions, jury trials, and appeals.
The motion papers assert that the jury's foreman, Velvin Hogan, has given at least a dozen public interviews since the trial concluded (including an interview with the tech website The Verge), and that during those interviews he misstated the law as it regards patent infringement.
We represented defendant Belkin in a patent infringement case through two jury trials in the Eastern District of Texas and an appeal to the Federal Circuit.
Cheetah Omni LLC v. Verizon Services Corporation, et al. — Jury Trial Represented Cheetah Omni in a patent infringement lawsuit concerning fiber optic switching technology.
z4 v. Microsoft and Autodesk — Jury Trial & Appeal to Federal Circuit Represented z4 in a patent infringement case involving two patents relating to technology for reducing software piracy.
Trial Consultants, Jury Consulting, Trial Consulting, Juries, Jury Consultants, Patent Litigation, Voir Dire, Jury Selection, Insurance Coverage
As trial counsel, Mr. Davis has obtained favorable verdicts for his clients in jury and bench trials in both state and federal courts in a wide variety of trademark, patent and trade secrets cases, as well as breach of contract and corporate matters.
Mr. Nelson has practiced in federal courts all across the United States, and his litigation experience involves all aspects of litigation from pre-litigation analysis and negotiation through jury trial, including managing discovery and disputes, taking and defending depositions, selecting and preparing fact and expert witnesses, preparing and arguing dispositive and non-dispositive motions, preparing and arguing claim construction positions and briefing, and developing case strategies regarding the infringement, validity, and enforceability of patents.
Oil States also argues that since the eighteenth century, actions challenging the validity of issued patents have been decided by courts of law, and thus the patent owner's right to a jury trial is preserved under the Seventh Amendment.
As a real - life example, the e-book examines in detail the recent high - stakes patent case between Apple and Samsung and takes a close look at the trial exhibits that both sides introduced, from the point of view of how convincing they were likely to be to a jury.
He has represented clients in all phases of IP litigation, including patent jury and bench trials and appeals, pre-trial proceedings, and successfully arguing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
He litigates and tries cases in courts throughout the country, including Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), including eight jury trials and nineteen bench trials, six of which were patent trials at the ITC.
Trial Graphics, Trial Consultants, Litigation Graphics, Jury Consulting, Courtroom Presentations, Litigation Consulting, Trial Consulting, Patent Litigation
He has represented clients in all phases of IP litigation, including patent jury and bench trials and appeals, pre-trial proceedings, and successfully arguing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
In a 7 - 2 opinion authored by Associate Justice Thomas, the Court rejected Oil States» contention that the IPR process violated the separation of powers of Article III and a patent owner's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial on the question of patent validity.
Besides accepting all items on which Oracle and Google had reached agreement in their joint memorandum, the judge granted Oracle its most important wish: the final decision on the number of asserted patent claims to go to jury trial will not be taken now but instead at the final pre-trial conference.
Find other patent litigation jury consulting, litigation graphics on trial technology discussions on A2L Consulting's site:
We have tried hundreds of cases before juries and judges, in federal and state courts, administrative bodies such as the Patent and Trademark Office and the International Trade Commission (ITC), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) and in a myriad of foreign tribunals.
In 2005, Mr. Fenster obtained a jury verdict of non-infringement for a defendant in a patent trial in Central District of California involving construction equipment.
Trial Graphics, Trial Consultants, Litigation Graphics, Trial Presentation, Jury Consulting, Courtroom Presentations, Mock Trial, Juries, Patent Litigation, Storytelling, Apple v. Samsung
We have litigated over 250 patent cases in the past two years, with achievements that include outright wins on motions to dismiss, summary judgments, bench and jury trials.
I think you'll find articles like these very helpful: 5 Tips For Inter Partes Review Hearing Presentations at the PTO 11 Tips for Winning at Your Markman Hearings 16 PowerPoint Litigation Graphics You Won't Believe Are PowerPoint Introducing Mock Markman Hearings to Patent Litigation Trial Graphics in Patent Litigation - 11 Great Demonstrative Tips Explaining a Complicated Process Using Trial Graphics 10 Things Every Mock Jury Ever Has Said 5 Questions to Ask in Voir Dire... Always 5 Essential Elements of Storytelling and Persuasion 12 Worst PowerPoint Mistakes Litigators Make
The plaintiff in the challenge had been issued patents in the late 1970s based on an application from 1959, but on the eve of jury trial in 1982, the case had been continued pending a reexamination under the new statute.
After a six - day trial, the jury awarded a complete defense victory finding that HTC did not infringe the asserted patent, and that the patent claims are invalid based on anticipation and / or obviousness.
Apple told an eight - member jury during opening statements in a high - profile California federal damages trial Tuesday that Samsung owes it more than $ 1 billion for infringing three of Apple's design patents covering iPhones, while Samsung pegged the number at just $ 28 million.
His experience includes numerous Section 337 trials at the ITC, jury and bench trials in district court and patent office litigation, including more than 60 inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.
He has tried 33 cases before juries, ranging from patent infringement to white - collar criminal trials.
Of course, it would still be up to a jury to decide, but based on Apple's proposed and supported interpretation of the law, the judge presiding over a cupholder design patent trial wouldn't have a choice but to instruct the jury that a total, unapportioned disgorgement of profits is possible under the law.
Guilty verdicts of juries in criminal cases, and any verdict in a civil case like a patent law case, are subject to post-trial review by the trial judge who can throw out the verdict or call for a new trial for a variety of reasons, and to appeal.
A jury trial, however, often costs millions and defendant are often forced to litigate in troll - friendly jurisdictions like East Texas, which have built cottage industries around patent lawsuits.
In 2010, Jack Henry went all the way to trial against Joao Bock Transaction Systems and convinced a jury to invalidate claims from the» 725 patent.
The complaint is typical of tactics used by patent trolls: invoking old patents to make sweeping claims, while demanding an injunction, damages and a jury trial.
Oracle had originally sued Google for both patent infringement and copyright infringement, but a jury found the patents were not infringed and the trial judge ruled that the APIs were not copyrightable.
Defendants would be required to go through expensive discovery, or even a full jury trial, to get a ruling on patent eligibility.
Twitter (which has never paid to settle a suit with a patent troll) recently won a jury trial against VS Technologies, which owned a patent for a «Method and system for creating an interactive virtual community of famous people.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z