Won
patent jury trial against LG Electronics, obtaining favorable infringement and invalidity verdicts as to all asserted claims, resulting in a 2016 Top 50 Jury Verdict in Texas.
There is no substitute for well - crafted graphics in
a patent jury trial involving technology.
Not exact matches
When Oracle v. Google went to
trial the first time, in 2012, the
jury found in favor of Google on every
patent claim.
Mr. Stellabotte is a registered
patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating
patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in federal and state
trial and appellate courts, including case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and
jury trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.
Given that there is only a limited amount of work left to do in order to adjudicate the withdrawn
patents, I think there's a pretty good chance that these
patents will go to
trial, be it a bench
trial or a
jury trial, in 2013.
Instead, this
jury just confirmed what the Wall Street Journal's Apple reporter Daisuke Wakabayashi said on Twitter yesterday: «With a
jury of
patent / tech novices,
trial comes down to which lawyer can tell the better story.»
As America's most - cited judge, Judge Richard Posner, put it last year, «Judges have difficulty understanding modern technology and jurors have even greater difficulty, yet
patent plaintiffs tend to request
trial by
jury because they believe that jurors tend to favor patentees, believing that they must be worthy inventors defending the fruits of their invention against copycats -LSB-...]».
After a
jury's finding of
patent infringement, the court rules on a number of pre -(damages)-
trial motions, with 3 such rulings of interest.
During a
trial, I have a limited amount of time to teach the
jury the technology that is
patented and how an accused device would infringe (or avoid infringement) of the
patent claim at issue.
Houston
patent trial lawyer Demetrios Anaipakos of Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing P.C., or AZA, has won a $ 9 million federal
jury verdict for Texas - based
patent licensing company Saint Lawrence Communications LLC against technology heavyweight Motorola Mobility LLC for
patent infringement.
We have litigated a wide variety of
jury cases, bench
trials, Federal Circuit appeals and U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office interferences and other proceedings across a wide range of technical areas, including:
Arbitration & Mediation Attorneys Needed Bankruptcy Boating Books Careers Counselors Disposition / Court Reporters Document Examination Economic Damages Education Expert Witnesses Accidents Advertising Aviation Banking / Finance Computers Construction Document Examination Economic Damages Employment Discrimination Engineering Medical General Medical Specialty Anesthesia Chiropractic Drug Emergency & Trauma Hospital Director Neurologist Nursing Home Oncology Odontology Orthopedics Pharmacology Psychiatry Surgery Toxicology Other Financial Services Heir Tracers Horses Equine Appraisers Insurance Intellectual Property
Jury &
Trial Consultants Legal Malpractice Marketing Office Products Other Real Estate Real Estate Finance Security Trademarks and
Patents Training Web Development
Trial Graphics, Litigation Graphics,
Trial Presentation,
Trial Consulting,
Juries,
Patent Litigation, Science, Psychology, Checklists, Medical Malpractice
After a four day
jury trial, DynaEnergetics obtained a complete defense verdict, including findings of noninfringement and three different bases of invalidity for each of the
patent claims.
After a five - day
jury trial, the validity of a
patent covering the industry transforming paperboard container for twelve - pack beverages was upheld and found infringed by the competitor.
As a result, our attorneys have deep and broad expertise in all phases of
patent litigation from pre-litigation counseling through Markman hearings, dispositive motions,
jury trials, and appeals.
The motion papers assert that the
jury's foreman, Velvin Hogan, has given at least a dozen public interviews since the
trial concluded (including an interview with the tech website The Verge), and that during those interviews he misstated the law as it regards
patent infringement.
We represented defendant Belkin in a
patent infringement case through two
jury trials in the Eastern District of Texas and an appeal to the Federal Circuit.
Cheetah Omni LLC v. Verizon Services Corporation, et al. —
Jury Trial Represented Cheetah Omni in a
patent infringement lawsuit concerning fiber optic switching technology.
z4 v. Microsoft and Autodesk —
Jury Trial & Appeal to Federal Circuit Represented z4 in a
patent infringement case involving two
patents relating to technology for reducing software piracy.
Trial Consultants,
Jury Consulting,
Trial Consulting,
Juries,
Jury Consultants,
Patent Litigation, Voir Dire,
Jury Selection, Insurance Coverage
As
trial counsel, Mr. Davis has obtained favorable verdicts for his clients in
jury and bench
trials in both state and federal courts in a wide variety of trademark,
patent and trade secrets cases, as well as breach of contract and corporate matters.
Mr. Nelson has practiced in federal courts all across the United States, and his litigation experience involves all aspects of litigation from pre-litigation analysis and negotiation through
jury trial, including managing discovery and disputes, taking and defending depositions, selecting and preparing fact and expert witnesses, preparing and arguing dispositive and non-dispositive motions, preparing and arguing claim construction positions and briefing, and developing case strategies regarding the infringement, validity, and enforceability of
patents.
Oil States also argues that since the eighteenth century, actions challenging the validity of issued
patents have been decided by courts of law, and thus the
patent owner's right to a
jury trial is preserved under the Seventh Amendment.
As a real - life example, the e-book examines in detail the recent high - stakes
patent case between Apple and Samsung and takes a close look at the
trial exhibits that both sides introduced, from the point of view of how convincing they were likely to be to a
jury.
He has represented clients in all phases of IP litigation, including
patent jury and bench
trials and appeals, pre-trial proceedings, and successfully arguing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
He litigates and tries cases in courts throughout the country, including Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), including eight
jury trials and nineteen bench
trials, six of which were
patent trials at the ITC.
Trial Graphics,
Trial Consultants, Litigation Graphics,
Jury Consulting, Courtroom Presentations, Litigation Consulting,
Trial Consulting,
Patent Litigation
He has represented clients in all phases of IP litigation, including
patent jury and bench
trials and appeals, pre-trial proceedings, and successfully arguing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
In a 7 - 2 opinion authored by Associate Justice Thomas, the Court rejected Oil States» contention that the IPR process violated the separation of powers of Article III and a
patent owner's Seventh Amendment right to a
jury trial on the question of
patent validity.
Besides accepting all items on which Oracle and Google had reached agreement in their joint memorandum, the judge granted Oracle its most important wish: the final decision on the number of asserted
patent claims to go to
jury trial will not be taken now but instead at the final pre-
trial conference.
Find other
patent litigation
jury consulting, litigation graphics on
trial technology discussions on A2L Consulting's site:
We have tried hundreds of cases before
juries and judges, in federal and state courts, administrative bodies such as the
Patent and Trademark Office and the International Trade Commission (ITC),
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), Trademark
Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) and in a myriad of foreign tribunals.
In 2005, Mr. Fenster obtained a
jury verdict of non-infringement for a defendant in a
patent trial in Central District of California involving construction equipment.
Trial Graphics,
Trial Consultants, Litigation Graphics,
Trial Presentation,
Jury Consulting, Courtroom Presentations, Mock
Trial,
Juries,
Patent Litigation, Storytelling, Apple v. Samsung
We have litigated over 250
patent cases in the past two years, with achievements that include outright wins on motions to dismiss, summary judgments, bench and
jury trials.
I think you'll find articles like these very helpful: 5 Tips For Inter Partes Review Hearing Presentations at the PTO 11 Tips for Winning at Your Markman Hearings 16 PowerPoint Litigation Graphics You Won't Believe Are PowerPoint Introducing Mock Markman Hearings to
Patent Litigation
Trial Graphics in
Patent Litigation - 11 Great Demonstrative Tips Explaining a Complicated Process Using
Trial Graphics 10 Things Every Mock
Jury Ever Has Said 5 Questions to Ask in Voir Dire... Always 5 Essential Elements of Storytelling and Persuasion 12 Worst PowerPoint Mistakes Litigators Make
The plaintiff in the challenge had been issued
patents in the late 1970s based on an application from 1959, but on the eve of
jury trial in 1982, the case had been continued pending a reexamination under the new statute.
After a six - day
trial, the
jury awarded a complete defense victory finding that HTC did not infringe the asserted
patent, and that the
patent claims are invalid based on anticipation and / or obviousness.
Apple told an eight - member
jury during opening statements in a high - profile California federal damages
trial Tuesday that Samsung owes it more than $ 1 billion for infringing three of Apple's design
patents covering iPhones, while Samsung pegged the number at just $ 28 million.
His experience includes numerous Section 337
trials at the ITC,
jury and bench
trials in district court and
patent office litigation, including more than 60 inter partes review (IPR) proceedings.
He has tried 33 cases before
juries, ranging from
patent infringement to white - collar criminal
trials.
Of course, it would still be up to a
jury to decide, but based on Apple's proposed and supported interpretation of the law, the judge presiding over a cupholder design
patent trial wouldn't have a choice but to instruct the
jury that a total, unapportioned disgorgement of profits is possible under the law.
Guilty verdicts of
juries in criminal cases, and any verdict in a civil case like a
patent law case, are subject to post-
trial review by the
trial judge who can throw out the verdict or call for a new
trial for a variety of reasons, and to appeal.
A
jury trial, however, often costs millions and defendant are often forced to litigate in troll - friendly jurisdictions like East Texas, which have built cottage industries around
patent lawsuits.
In 2010, Jack Henry went all the way to
trial against Joao Bock Transaction Systems and convinced a
jury to invalidate claims from the» 725
patent.
The complaint is typical of tactics used by
patent trolls: invoking old
patents to make sweeping claims, while demanding an injunction, damages and a
jury trial.
Oracle had originally sued Google for both
patent infringement and copyright infringement, but a
jury found the
patents were not infringed and the
trial judge ruled that the APIs were not copyrightable.
Defendants would be required to go through expensive discovery, or even a full
jury trial, to get a ruling on
patent eligibility.
Twitter (which has never paid to settle a suit with a
patent troll) recently won a
jury trial against VS Technologies, which owned a
patent for a «Method and system for creating an interactive virtual community of famous people.»