Sentences with phrase «patent litigation claims»

- The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to provide educational resources for those facing abusive patent litigation claims.

Beaudoin has been a speaker at various events and recently discussed the effect of rising patent litigation claims upon innovation, touching on topics related to technology players within oil sands and the effect of patent litigation on the region's hydrocarbons industry innovation.

Not exact matches

He said the most effective way to blunt trolling is to make it less costly to see patent litigation through to court so companies will not feel pressed to settle claims quickly.

Those include: net - nets, shell companies (NOL companies, SPACs), contingent value securities (including patent trolls, CVRs, litigation claims) and discounted closed end funds.

For example, when the Apple / Samsung global patent litigation disputes started a few years ago, some commentators attributed the parties» decision not to litigate in Canada to inter alia, our lengthy discovery process and our apparent reluctance to narrow the issues early on (for example by providing claim charts (for both validity and infringement) at a preliminary stage).

Patent litigation, including managing electronic discovery efforts, working with expert witnesses to draft invalidity and non-infringement reports, drafting claim construction briefs and motions for summary judgment, and pre-trial preparations.

· Our Appellate group is known for working with our trial lawyers to handle litigation in a broad range of areas, including qui tam actions and securities, oil and gas / energy, the First Amendment, patent and intellectual property, bankruptcy, tax, commercial transactions, business torts, mass torts, catastrophic personal injury claims, condemnation and regulatory matters.

Prosecuting and defending IP infringement claims, including trademark, copyright, patent (including patent trolls), and trade secret litigation, in both State and Federal Courts throughout the United States and in front of the USPTO.

The initially promised affordability of the «unitary patent» and Unified Patent Court (UPC) especially for small and medium - sized enterprises (SMEs), which was repeated almost mantra - like throughout the EU legislative proceedings as one reason why the reform was of utmost importance, ultimately turned out to be pretty much the opposite, with the level of representation costs to be reimbursed by the losing to the winning party amounting to up to more than five times the sum which can currently be claimed in patent litigation proceedings before the German courts (for more details on the cost situation created by the reform, cf. the article «Unitary patent and court system — A poisoned gift for SMEs» patent» and Unified Patent Court (UPC) especially for small and medium - sized enterprises (SMEs), which was repeated almost mantra - like throughout the EU legislative proceedings as one reason why the reform was of utmost importance, ultimately turned out to be pretty much the opposite, with the level of representation costs to be reimbursed by the losing to the winning party amounting to up to more than five times the sum which can currently be claimed in patent litigation proceedings before the German courts (for more details on the cost situation created by the reform, cf. the article «Unitary patent and court system — A poisoned gift for SMEs» Patent Court (UPC) especially for small and medium - sized enterprises (SMEs), which was repeated almost mantra - like throughout the EU legislative proceedings as one reason why the reform was of utmost importance, ultimately turned out to be pretty much the opposite, with the level of representation costs to be reimbursed by the losing to the winning party amounting to up to more than five times the sum which can currently be claimed in patent litigation proceedings before the German courts (for more details on the cost situation created by the reform, cf. the article «Unitary patent and court system — A poisoned gift for SMEs» patent litigation proceedings before the German courts (for more details on the cost situation created by the reform, cf. the article «Unitary patent and court system — A poisoned gift for SMEs» patent and court system — A poisoned gift for SMEs» here).

He has litigated, arbitrated and mediated cases involving banking (workouts, foreclosures, «lender liability,» and other aspects of loan enforcement and collection), real estate (developer disputes, landlord / tenant litigation, broker commission disputes, boundary disputes and adverse possession), partnerships and family - owned businesses (issues involving company control, buyouts and valuation), real estate finance (default resolution, servicing and lien priority, trust disputes and guardianships), intellectual property (prosecution and defense of cases involving trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and patents) and other matters involving various contract and business tort claims.

Advising professional services firms, manufacturers and media companies in commercial arbitrations and civil litigation arising from claims of fraud, breach of contract, malpractice, veil piercing and patent infringement.

I am a patent litigator, and I have participated in dozens of Markman or claim construction hearings both as a lawyer and as a litigation consultant.

Patent Tutorial, Markman Hearings, Litigation Graphics, Patent Litigation, Judges, Claim Construction, ITC

Mr. Baker has experience in all areas of the litigation process in commercial disputes involving false advertising claims, trademark and trade dress infringement claims, copyright infringement claims, data privacy claims, patent infringement claims, art ownership and acquisition claims, trade secrets, right of publicity / privacy claims, consumer protection statute claims, and breach of contract claims.

As I explained in a previous post, «the decision on Apple's claims was very specific not only to the four patents at issue at that stage of the litigation but also to the course of events in that litigation (as I pointed out in my detailed analysis)», as evidenced by the fact that Apple has meanwhile won two preliminary injunctions against Samsung, while «Judge Posner's position on FRAND is universally - applicable, and it will be extremely influential, throughout and beyond the United States», to Google's (Motorola's) dismay.

Patent Tutorial, Markman Hearings, Trial Graphics, Litigation Graphics, Trial Presentation, Trial Consulting, Animation, Patent Litigation, PowerPoint, Claim Construction, Information Design

If the new standard causes the Federal Circuit's relatively high reversal rate on claim construction to decrease, parties may go to greater lengths to avoid litigation in forums with relatively inexperienced judges or uneven track records in determining patent cases.

In addition to her patent litigation practice, Gabrielle has litigated complex commercial matters involving claims of trade dress infringement, trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and unfair competition.

In addition, although the Gunn Court noted that state court interpretations of the Patent Act would not be binding on federal courts, [10] final state court judgments determining patent issues, such as validity, infringement, or claim construction, may well be binding on a patentee in subsequent litigation involving the same or related paPatent Act would not be binding on federal courts, [10] final state court judgments determining patent issues, such as validity, infringement, or claim construction, may well be binding on a patentee in subsequent litigation involving the same or related papatent issues, such as validity, infringement, or claim construction, may well be binding on a patentee in subsequent litigation involving the same or related patents.

Apple wanted a better outcome, but the decision on Apple's claims was very specific not only to the four patents at issue at that stage of the litigation but also to the course of events in that litigation (as I pointed out in my detailed analysis).

It should be noted that the proper claim construction standard for PTAB trial proceedings is a subject of patent reform bills pending in Congress, which would direct the USPTO to apply the same standard as that used in federal court litigation.

Drawing on attorneys from across practice areas and offices, Weil has developed an impressive track record advising with respect to shareholder claims and demands for litigation, internal whistleblower complaints, class and collective actions brought by employees relating to pay, worker classification, and discrimination claims, product liability issues and recalls, privacy rights, intellectual property disputes (patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets), regulatory investigations commenced by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Justice, and state attorneys general, and major disputes with suppliers and competitors.

The Court seemed most concerned by the procedural impact of claim construction in PTAB trials, and the potential effect on district court litigation concerning the same patents.

To allow such extrinsic evidence for the purpose of defining the monopoly would undermine the public notice function of the claims, and increase uncertainty as well as fuelling the already overheated engines of patent litigation.

The kinds of representation we provide involve: (1) litigation and appeals regarding a wide variety of legal issues; (2) employment disputes, including discrimination claims and accusations of noncompliance with wage and hour laws; (3) intellectual property matters regarding patents, trademarks and copyright infringements; (4) commercial real estate matters; (5) business law disputes; and (6) alternative dispute resolution («ADR») matters, including mediation and arbitration cases.

In this latest chapter of a long - running litigation involving the direct infringement of patent claims involving multiple actors, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently concluded that a defendant can be liable for direct infringement when it «conditions participation in an activity or receipt of a benefit...

Markman Hearings, Litigation Consulting, Patent Litigation, Claim Construction, ITC, Federal Circuit, Inter Partes Review

Stewart Sokol & Larkin's general liability defense spans the distance from individual policy holders to large corporations, and we are committed to helping our clients through liability scenarios ranging from personal injury / wrongful death, premises liability, product liability, uninsured / underinsured motorist liability, insurance coverage litigation, civil rights claims, construction defect to patent / trademark infringement.

Mr. Nelson has practiced in federal courts all across the United States, and his litigation experience involves all aspects of litigation from pre-litigation analysis and negotiation through jury trial, including managing discovery and disputes, taking and defending depositions, selecting and preparing fact and expert witnesses, preparing and arguing dispositive and non-dispositive motions, preparing and arguing claim construction positions and briefing, and developing case strategies regarding the infringement, validity, and enforceability of patents.

His experience in patent prosecution has helped him better understand the process of obtaining a patent, including analyzing file histories, which has been invaluable to him during litigation, especially in formulating claim construction and invalidity positions.

J. Owen Todd, a partner in the firm, serves as a mediator and arbitrator in the resolution of civil disputes, including matters of product liability, environmental issues, complex commercial litigation, employment discrimination and harassment, patent and copyright claims, divorce, probate litigation, and personal injury claims.

J. Christopher Fox, II (Business Litigation)-- Fox is a partner whose practice encompasses a broad range of commercial disputes, including contractual issues arising in the financial services arena, matters relating to restrictive covenants and unfair competition claims, and litigation of patent and trademark infringement claims, as well as defense and prosecution of claims for misappropriation of tradLitigation)-- Fox is a partner whose practice encompasses a broad range of commercial disputes, including contractual issues arising in the financial services arena, matters relating to restrictive covenants and unfair competition claims, and litigation of patent and trademark infringement claims, as well as defense and prosecution of claims for misappropriation of tradlitigation of patent and trademark infringement claims, as well as defense and prosecution of claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.

The district court litigation and the IPR proceeded in parallel, with the district court construing the «053 patent claims in a manner that undercut Greene's invalidity contentions.

Our Houston commercial litigation lawyers also have experience in intellectual property claims, patent disputes, insurance disputes, and securities fraud.

Speaker, «Advanced Patent Prosecution: Electrical Claim Drafting, Drawings and Designs, Mechanical Claim Prosecution, Claim Drafting with a View Toward Litigation,» SLWK seminars, 2004 - 2005

Rather, as the Supreme Court has explained in a series of decisions over the past decade, the rule in patent cases should be the same as in any other sort of litigation — in this case, the equitable doctrine of laches may not be used by accused infringers as a defense because there is a statute of limitations present to limit claims.

As our country becomes more and more dependant on an intellectual property economy (as opposed to manufacturing or agriculture), it's becoming increasingly important to reduce the amount of money wasted on frivolous litigation and patent claims.

This later patent (No. 5,946,647 shown below) has just now been returned to the Samsung litigation based upon an order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which in an opinion last Friday (April 25, 2014) revived the patent by affirming a claim construction by Judge Richard A. Posner from a different case by Apple against Motorola — Judge Posner's claim construction contrasted with that of Judge Luch Koh in the Samsung litigation.

A high percentage of claim constructions in U.S. patent litigation are modified on appeal.

We advise our clients in all aspects of intellectual property law, including counseling, litigation, licensing and prosecution matters that involve patents, trademarks, service marks, domain names, trade dress, trade secrets, copyrights, privacy and advertising claims.

Patent Tutorial, Markman Hearings, Trial Graphics, Litigation Graphics, Demonstrative Evidence, Animation, Patent Litigation, PowerPoint, Claim Construction, Information Design

The court's reasoning largely focused on two aspects of the case: Eon - Net's litigation tactics (including filing a lawsuit based on an unreasonable interpretation of the meaning of the patent claims, destroying documents that could have been relevant to the litigation, and not participating in the claim construction process in good faith), and Eon - Net's failure to properly investigate Flagstar and compare the accused product to the patent claims prior to filing suit in the first place.

While IPR proceedings are directed to invalidating patent claims, they contain some features typically found in traditional patent litigation, including motions practice, expert declarations and depositions and other discovery issues.

Advising and representing a global technology company in a number of patent litigations, including defending it against standard - essential patent assertions and against the largest ever damages claim brought in patent infringement proceedings in Germany.

Let's now have a look at claim 1 of the patent as limited during litigation (the two other claims at stake are dependent claims):

Complex Commercial Litigation: assists in representation of leading corporations and financial institutions in complex commercial litigation, including patent infringement claims and securities invesLitigation: assists in representation of leading corporations and financial institutions in complex commercial litigation, including patent infringement claims and securities inveslitigation, including patent infringement claims and securities investigations.

The exact way a patent claim is constructed is central to patent litigation.

I navigate these various decisions and guidelines by working in collaboration with my clients as to various ways to claim their respective inventions (e.g., claiming non-natural claim elements where needed to illustrate patentably eligible subject matter, or alternatively looking for appropriate arguments that meet the USPTO's guidelines), proper development of a patent specification that can be used for prosecution and litigation purposes (e.g., good actual, prophetic and comparative examples to illustrate the novelty and nonobviousness of the invention while still maintaining a broad claim scope of protection for future enforcement), and continual review of the client's patent landscape (via competitive and white space analyses and updates) to look for additional IP opportunities.

The outcome of a multi-million dollar patent litigation may hinge upon the interpretation of a single word or two in a patent claim.

Serving as lead litigation counsel in two patent infringement cases involving methods for intron - sequence analysis DNA and genomic mapping, including obtaining a favorable claim construction ruling on all 15 disputed claim terms which drove a favorable settlement.