Sentences with phrase «patent numbering system»

Main Japanese patent numbering system and other FAQs on Japan, China and Korea»

«Japanese patent numbering system and other FAQs on Japan, China and Korea Main Would you sell your IP on eBay?»

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Japanese patent numbering system and other FAQs on Japan, China and Korea:

Not exact matches

He has successfully launched a number of products and holds patents for various technologies and systems he co-designed.

Of course, all is not rosy for Green Mountain, as a number of food retailers and quick - serve restaurant chains have taken advantage of the Keurig system's patent expiration to pursue alternative partnerships.

The patented system overcomes many of the challenges facing materials handling: it reduces the number of pallets and amount of shrink wrap needed, eliminates the need for corrugated materials and enables an attractive, durable and effective display of the product.

The stroller has a number of ideal features including these: a patented quick fold system, a hand operated braking system, a front wheel suspension, sealed ball bearings, two sets of air tight pneumatic wheel (12» rear and 8» front).

A system for covertly reading the number plates of cars at night has been patented by the Ministry of Defence.

Through a patent - pending system devised by Carmony, Dating DNA encapsulates over 300 pieces of information down into a single 9 - digit number, including all the particulars about a person and the type of people they prefer to date.

Fine Art Registry (FAR) is a U.S. patented identification numbering system and database, realized, engineered and specially developed as a Web - based, permanent standard registration system and globally networked database for fine art, which is based on the Getty's Object ID, the core world standard for the identification of art and cultural objects.

technologies and growing patent field; the number of Dutch patents granted via the EPO system grew significantly in 2016 (apparently a new record number and the strongest growth in 10 years).

Some stakeholders GAO interviewed said that the increase in 2011 was most likely influenced by the anticipation of changes in the 2011 Leahy - Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which made several significant changes to the U.S. patent system, including limiting the number of defendants in a lawsuit, causing some plaintiffs that would have previously filed a single lawsuit with multiple defendants to break the lawsuit into multiple lawsuits.

Indeed, while district courts invalidated more than double the number of patents under § 101 in the second half of 2014 than in the entire previous year, those decisions represent a very small number of cases relative to the volume of litigation in the system.

In recent years, the USPTO has come under increasing scrutiny over the quality of its patent examinations.1 The growing push for reform of the patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent examinations.1 The growing push for reform of the patent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent system is fueled by the rapid rise of technology, financial services, telecommunications, and other innovations driving the information economy, all straining the USPTO's ability to evaluate and issue quality patents.2 Problems with patent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent quality occur when the Patent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dPatent Office grants patents on claims that are broader than what is merited by the invention and the prior art. 3 In fact, a number of these problematic patents have been issued and publicized to much fanfare, including the infamous Smuckers» peanut butter and jelly patent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent where the company asserted a patent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent on their method of making the UncrustiblesTM crust-less peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, among others.4 These «bad» or improvidently granted patents impact the USPTO's ability to promote overall patent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public dpatent quality which, I will show, has serious implications for the public domain.

No word yet on what operating system the unnamed Swatch device will run, but Hayek did say the company applied for a record number of patents in 2014, with these being reflected in «numerous innovative project launches in all segments» this year.

The appointment is significant because Lee used to hold the title «Head of Patents and Patent Strategy» at Google, (s goog) where she issued a number of blog posts like this one calling for reform of the patent sPatent Strategy» at Google, (s goog) where she issued a number of blog posts like this one calling for reform of the patent spatent system.

No, it won't curtail trolling altogether and it won't eliminate the large number of bad patents already floating through the system.

The patent appears to carefully avoid patenting an entire blockchain network by extolling a number of «embodiments» or manners in which this system can manifest itself.

With patent trolls and patent wars creating a massive drag on innovation, a number of companies have investigated ways to navigate the patent system while still promoting openness and competition.

According to the patent, the system was designed to address the increasing number of transactions that any financial enterprise is required to process from their clients.

In 2011, Congress passed legislative reforms to patent law in response to growing concerns that the patent system was unable to deal with challenges presented by the ever growing number of patent applications being submitted and the increasing complexity of the technology for which a patent is being requested.