There is a good chance that this cooperative process will reduce
patent pendency, as well as improve patent prosecution quality.
Not exact matches
Ford Motor Company v. Paice, Representative Case Nos.: IPR2014 - 00570, IPR2014 - 00875, IPR2014 - 01415, IPR2015 - 00785, IPR2015 - 00801, (PTAB)-- Represented Ford during the
pendency of the 22 inter partes review proceedings challenging the validity of hundreds of claims across five separate
patents.
Ford Motor Company v. Paice, Representative Case Nos.: IPR2014 - 00571, IPR2014 - 00904, IPR2015 - 00722, IPR2015 - 00790 (PTAB)-- Represented Ford during the
pendency of the 22 inter partes review proceedings challenging the validity of hundreds of claims across five separate
patents.
The rule that controls
patent term adjustments for application
pendency is 35 USC § 154 (b), and section 35 USC § 154 (b)(1)(B)(i) states:
As a result,
patent practitioners are able to facilitate arriving at patentable subject matter more quickly, to streamline the
patent preparation and prosecution process, decrease
pendency times, save costs, and obtain higher quality, stronger and more defensible
patents.