Sentences with phrase «patent utility issues»
The United States urges Canada to engage meaningfully with affected stakeholders and the United States on patent utility issues.»
http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/ Not exact matches
A list of the top patent firms that are ranked based on the total number of U.S. utility patents that issued in 2016 where the patent firms...
We compiled a list of the top patent firms, which are ranked based on the total number of U.S. utility patents that issued in 2015 where the...
The analysis, which examined 4.6 million utility patents issued from 1976 to 2013, was led by Cassidy R. Sugimoto, an associate professor of informatics at the School of Informatics and Computing at IU Bloomington.
As Gary Stix reviewed in «Owning the Stuff of Life,» in the February issue, companies and universities have been on a spree of patenting not only whole genes but also genetic fragments of unknown utility.
Crist has criticized Canadian «promise» case law for invalidating pharmaceutical patents for lack of utility despite the fact that the medicines at issue were commercially successful.
1999)-- Enforced Juicy Whip's patent on beverage dispenser technology, including three successful precedent - setting appeals to the Federal Circuit on issues of patent utility, invalidity standards, and damages.
The new large entity issue fee for a utility patent will increase $ 40 to $ 1,000.
A utility patent covers inventions, that is, non-obvious and useful processes, machines, manufactured articles, or compositions of matter; plant patents are issued for new varieties of plants; and design patents protect ornamental designs.
Nearly every year for the past decade, the Patent Offices have issued more utility and design patents.
Despite the uncertainty, in 2017, there were approximately 5 % more issued utility patents and roughly 10 % more issued design patents than in 2016.
Sometime this year, the 10 millionth U.S. utility patent will issue.
Six years after the SCC considered the NOC case (finding Sanofi's patent not anticipated or obvious), the SCC will once again consider the validity of the same patent in an action (re-litigating issues of obviousness, and considering utility / Promise).
While utility patents are issued for new and useful inventions, design patents cover non-functional, ornamental aspects of a product.
The jury also found that Apple proved by clear and convincing evidence that Samsung infringement was willful as to all the utility patents at issue, in addition to the design patents on the iPhone.