Although they believe that the courts seem to be coming back to some kind of balance — albeit slowly — it still remains that the «promise doctrine» and the lack of better - defined
patent validity tests could have unfortunate consequences.
Not exact matches
Another big case examines the patentability of diagnostic
testing, and a third case in the pipeline could rethink the standard the Court set in 1983 to
test the obviousness of what is patentable — a case that could call into question the
validity of hundreds of thousands of existing
patents.
Even so, the divergence between the two rulings is more apparent than real: both held that PFD agreements can be subject to antitrust scrutiny; both considered the size of the value transferred as a relevant factor for the assessment of the settlement agreements; both rejected the «scope of the
patent»
test as being problematic; and both stressed that the
patent validity presumption is not equated to a presumption of
patent infringement.
Federal Court of Appeal Applies Supreme Court's Utility
Test for the First Time to Uphold
Validity of BMS» Dasatinib
Patent
The potential vagueness and suspect
validity of some of these
patents may affect the calculus under the four - factor
test.