Socks and Simon are the only ones who do not realize how
pathetic their arguments have become.
All pathetic arguments with no other intention than to speculate bollocks.
I hope we don't hear (as we did initially in the reports of arsenic in fruit juice) any more
pathetic arguments regarding the toxicological merits of organic vs. inorganic arsenic.
Why is it that you only have the same
pathetic arguments and tactics?
It's a common
pathetic argument from many Christians who are defenseless against what the Bible ACTALLY SAYS.
The one presupposing is you idiot, not me, that's the problem with your whole
pathetic argument.
That's the most
pathetic argument I've ever heard.
It is a puerile and
pathetic argument, meant to guilt people into acquiescence, but since it is being entertained, we must ask whether it is true.
What they are doing is a perfectly acceptable political mechanism that has been used numerous times in the past by both republicans and democrats; thus
this pathetic argument about them not doing their jobs etc is completely disingenuous because they are, in fact, doing their jobs.
Very
pathetic argument of yours.
Sadly there seems to be no limit to how
pathetic the argument can be, and some people still consider it plausible.
Michael, that's such
a pathetic argument.
Not exact matches
Well, saying it is one thing, but can you explain how, exactly, these
arguments are
pathetic?
Fred, while I laugh at your
pathetic «
arguments, my points are serious ones.
Third your
pathetic Discovery Insti.tute intelligent design anti-evolution
arguments have all been debunked many times.
Vic, your
arguments are truly
pathetic.
By the way, just to dissect your
pathetic attempt at making an
argument by mere numerical coincidence.
I have seen enough debates to know the atheists
arguments are fairly
pathetic.
The fact that you can't figure out how to write «psychiatrists» or even «shrinks», but have to use the
pathetic «physic», which doesn't make any sense at all, is evidence that you're not bright enough to make a cogent
argument against gay marriage.
Am I
pathetic because I have a crappy life, or because you could not refute my
arguments against your bible and god?
Perhaps the chief of Ivan's demonic deceptions is the widespread acceptance of the Inquisitor's
argument that «miracle, mystery, and authority» are
pathetic necessities for weak - willed men.
Pick and choose what you want to prop up your flimsy
argument...
pathetic.
It's getting very boring and the
arguments are becoming
pathetic.
now everybody just talk Shiit about us and with us fans being the joke in every pub... sport bar even in every
argument... on Thursday when we were a goal down against Koln two Chelsea fans who just walked into the bar where I was watching the game were like» look at them, see how
pathetic they are.
those three
arguments were
pathetic.
There is nowhere in the constitution that any ministerial portfolio has been created... So far as they have ministerial roles and functions, the only Minister who has been given constitutional recognition is the office of the Attorney General so with due respect to him, I do not see how he will have any serious
argument to press home either in the court or within Parliament because it is
pathetic... I am afraid his
argument is jejune.
Australia's Marine Geophysical Laboratory has publicly stated: «Gore's circumstantial
arguments are so weak that they are
pathetic.»
How exactly are you proving your point when you admit (emphasis mine)... «yes, the temperature moved FIRST» and you make hidden conciliatory statements like... «for the MAJORITY of that time» and then you freely admit... «CO2 did not trigger the warmings» and then you rely on the lamest of hollow
arguments... «according to climate THEORY and model EXPERIMENTS» and then you stumble back to close with complete opinion and conjecture... «we may well» and «The likely candidates» Anyone with a brain will read your post and laugh - it's
pathetic and you've actually done nothing but strengthen the skeptics
argument.
The complex reality of geologic processes are not conducive to your primitive dualistic operating system Your sloganeering as
argument while
pathetic, it's all you have.
While I empathize with Norm's tortured soul, his tortured logic is a
pathetic trap that plays into the dyskeptic
arguments of people who can make any temperature record seem to mean anything they want by simply abandoning the hard learned lessons of skepticism that tell us to judge data by signal: noise and appropriate statistical analyses.
Obviously AGW proponent's scientific
arguments are having an effect for Pilmer to be resorting to a
pathetic attack like this.
Your attempts to support the usual warmist
arguments from authority are
pathetic.
The
argument that paul s keeps trying to make about how much (or little) per capita the oil money represents is
pathetic.
I know I know NAR stance is lending standards are too strict... As long as FHA has it's
pathetic core requirements you can't make that
argument.