Sentences with phrase «pay for an item less»

If your customer needs to pay for an item less than $ 100, they will need to use an alternative payment method.

If a customer needs to pay for an item less than $ 100, they will need to use an alternative payment method.

Not exact matches

You will usually pay half or less of the original retail price for items at a consignment sale, which makes this a bit more expensive than other methods of shopping for used kids clothes, but still saves over buying new.

Of the vetoes Cuomo issued, 30 were for items that had been previously paid out, 31 were additional re-appropriations for undisbursed balances of less than $ 1,000.

But boosters for organic cotton say that paying less for conventional cotton items is penny wise and pound foolish.

The study, which appears in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), shows that when we come across low - valued items, we're willing to pay more for products we later face; by contrast, when we see high - valued items, we'll pay less for products we view in the future.

The recipient can exchange the gift for another course of equal or lesser value, or pay the difference on a more expensive item

I bought them from a pop up designer trade in shop, (where certified designer items no longer needed are sold on behalf of people for a commission) so paid far less for them brand new, as I would have direct from Chanel.

At first I was wondering why I would want a less expensive coat if they are normally an item I would pay more for.

You will pay 50 % or less for these items and be ready for summer the following year.

Now I pay more for items but I buy smarter and less.

You may pay more money for the item, but then you spend less in buying multiple things for your closet.

I am pretty shocked that people would be willing to pay > $ 50 for a fairly simple top and over $ 100 for a pair of jeans when there are so many options / sales / opportunites to pay less out there where you can find nice items for less.

Now I have more money to put towards my «designer want list» instead of paying for overpriced items that I can indeed get for less.

The implementation was different in each game but the overall problem was the same, in that the games were being made purposefully more difficult, or less interesting, unless you also paid for loot boxes which contained random in - game items.

In economic theory there's a notion called deadweight loss, or market inefficiency, which impacts a consumer when the value of an item's utility is less than the price paid for it.

It's a shame the A3 sedan won't come with the same new cut - price starting sticker as the A3 Sportback, and you'll still need to pay handsomely for all the available safety, styling and convenience items, but the base model is a heck of a lot of car for less than $ 40K.

And keep in mind, a smaller notepad means you'll pay less for the items.

Apart from the two scenarios above however, in my opinion it doesn't make sense to work with a subsidy / vanity outfit because they charge large fees for services you can do yourself for free or much less expense (e.g., copyright registration, $ 35 to do online yourself, $ 200 or more for a vanity / subsidy publisher to do for you), typically bundle services into packages that include items you don't need or don't want to pay for, and they also require you to use their editors, cover designers, etc..

Standard home insurance policies typically provide reimbursement for an item's depreciated value, meaning that you receive less compensation from your insurance company than what you paid for your items.

Generally speaking, if a purchased item has been returned for credit or some other adjustment (e.g. you choose to apply a «Rewards» amount to your account instead of getting a «$ 8 will get you $ 10» coupon for Starbucks) results in a credit to your account that gets posted on or before the due date of your most recent monthly statement, then you can pay the statement balance less the credit by the due date and still have it count as «monthly statement balance paid in full by due date.»

You can be using your cards to pay for less expensive items such as groceries.

Those who often find themselves buying stuff and then discovering that they could pay less for the same item they've just bought, will appreciate this credit card benefit — price protection.

They'll use the amount you paid for the item at the time of purchase (which would probably be less than a comparable item at current market value).

They quickly discovered that there was no money left over for their classes, had to drop out of school, and had a difficult time paying back their loans because the items they purchased were now worth far less than when they bought them.

Contents Replacement Cost: When your insurance company pays you for a damaged item, it typically pays you a depreciated cost, meaning that what you receive is less than you paid for the item.

Paying anything less than the balance in full is a dangerous practice for anyone who uses a credit card primarily for consumable items (like food, gas, and retail items).

A cash value policy, which pays for your personal property on a depreciated basis, costs less than a replacement value policy that will provide enough money for you to replace your items.

A homeowner with a few basic possessions will pay a lot less for coverage then a homeowner with high dollar collectible items and precious jewelry.

While you're reviewing your possessions, think about whether you want to insure them for actual cash value (where the policy would pay less money for older items than you paid for them new) or for replacement cost (which would cover to replace the items).

But wait... it's been a few days, and there's your item for $ 15 less than you paid!

Everyone hates that a shop owner pays you 1 / 6th or less of what they will sell you the item for — why not fix it?

Switched price tags and mistakes in deposits If a person switches the price tags on two items and then leaves the store, knowing that he is paying less for the item being bought than the original price tag, then that person may be charged with theft.

A cash value policy, which pays for your personal property on a depreciated basis, costs less than a replacement value policy that will provide enough money for you to replace your items.

ACV is obviously cheaper because it only provides payment for the depreciated value for losses less deductible, while full replacement pays out for what it would cost today to replace the lost or destroyed item new.

This could mean you receive less than what you originally paid for an item.

The downside is that you might possibly get less than what you originally paid for, depending on the item.

Home Improvement Pays off Heart of Dixie Dwellers paid less than average for auto insurance in 2007, but homeowners insurance was a big - ticket item that same year with an average of $ 905, the I.I.I. reports.

Without the endorsement, you would receive the depreciated value of your personal property — meaning that the compensation you'd receive from your insurance company would be less than what you paid for an item.

That means that you will get the full amount of your money you paid for your items even if they are worth less now, like that priceless ultimate outdoor frisbee you adore so much.

Actual cash value or ACV coverage has a less expensive premium, but it only reimburses the policy holder for the depreciated value of an item lost in a claim situation, while full replacement pays out for the present - day cost of a new replacement item.

The cost of paying for this Memphis coverage is going to be much less than paying for the replacement of lost or damaged items on your own.

So you may get less than you paid for older items.

Realistically, it costs a lot less to pay for an affordable premium each month for a renters policy than it would to replace every item within your Northeast Bronx rented property.

However, there were problems in trying to figure out how much should be sent over, as well as the problem of deciding who should be paying for what because the less - time parent still would end up buying things for the kids, or providing health insurance coverage or paying for other items on their (albeit «less») time.