Sentences with phrase «pay for legal services if»

Some will fight back with distinctive, niche or personalised service but there will be a move towards what future guru Richard Susskind has called the «latent legal market» ie those who will pay for legal services if they are cheap enough.

You do not pay us for our legal services if we are not successful and if you do not receive compensation at the end of the entire claim process.

The contingency fee method of payment is designed to protect the financial interests of the client at all times because you only have to pay for our legal services if our Kansas City accident attorneys are successful with your claim and you receive compensation.

You only have to pay us for our legal services if you receive compensation, so financial concern is something that you can stop wasting your energy on when you bring your personal injury claim to the personal injury attorneys at Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C.

Not exact matches

The Bets are also being told to be self - sufficient administratively: They can rely on Alphabet for functions like legal counsel, human resources, and public relations, but only if they pay Alphabet for the services.

However, if you have a problem with goods or services you paid for with your credit card, you can take the same legal actions against the seller as you would the card issuer (depending on state law).

The lower the Loan - to - Value ratio the better because it gives some protection against the risk of a decline in property or home values (prices) which can adversely affect the MIE if it has to pay for expenses associated to selling the property that has been used as collateral such as legal fees, realtor commissionsCommissions What you pay to a broker or agent for their services.

The only way a attorney referral service can receive compensation is a flat fee per a lead, no matter if it produces legal fees or not for the attorney and the amount paid can not be in direct relation to the amount of legal fees collected.

If you talk to a lawyer and your lawyer says not to do anything, don't pay back your loans «get your lawyer to put that in writing for you»!!!! There is a legal opinion from Charles Rotenberg stating that these are real loans and they need to be serviced.

Chris Kesterson and the workers at Debt Settlement America, if you truly want to help the people in these three examples, please pay for them to go bankrupt, give them a legal fresh start and leave them in a safer place than where they are right now, struggling to save money for your monthly services fees, that you will continue to charge them, and to pay you a big percentage of their debts as a settlement fee.

However, if you have a problem with goods or services you paid for with a credit or charge card, you can take the same legal actions against the card issuer as you can take under state law against the seller.

If you think that the Legal Services Commission has let you down, the Presidency of the Social Security and Child Support Appeal Tribunals is up for grabs from next April at # 129,900 per annum so long as you have had judicial experience in a salaried or fee paid capacity.

Making the decision to hire a virtual worker or pay for legal process outsourcing can be as simple as hiring an independent contractor fresh out of law school to do easy tasks, but if you are serious about using virtual workers on a larger scale in your firm and really getting the most out of it, it is important be aware of ethics considerations; price benefits and initial investments; and intangible benefits and costs when weighing the options of paying for a full - time staff, hiring on - site independent contractors, using outsourced service providers or juggling all of the work on your own.

If clients will no longer pay for more than the value that they derive from legal services, and as competition on price continues to intensify, lawyers will be forced to control their costs and seek innovative ways in which to service their clients.

Also on the basis of Simpson's models, the effect upon competition from private legal services providers (without distinguishing between informal or formal providers) is as follows: In either type of country (wealthy or poor), wealthy social groups are willing to pay hefty premiums for access to private legal institutions, whereas poor or disadvantaged groups will prefer private legal systems only if they are cheaper to access than the state's.

A judicial attempt to provide legal services paid for by HMCTS has been overturned by the Court of Appeal in re K & H (Children)[2015] EWCA Civ 543, [2015] All ER (D) 230 (May), so the individuals will either plod on, aided if possible by the court staff, the judge and pro bono work by lawyers.

Legal costs may be reduced if the fixed fee is less than the historical cost paid by the client for similar legal servLegal costs may be reduced if the fixed fee is less than the historical cost paid by the client for similar legal servlegal services.

The demand for legal services will only increase if lawyers want to get paid less (we don't) or the government wants to increase legal aid (they don't).

As to financing such development by Canada's lawyers (instead of by commercial investors) of software for automating the delivery of routine legal services: more than $ 11 million could be raised if every lawyer in Canada paid an addition one - time $ 100 increase in annual law society fees.

We offer free initial consultations for many of the legal practice areas we handle, and we can discuss a payment plan if you are concerned about your ability to pay for our services.

If the victims of Hurricane Harvey can access out - of - state lawyers for free legal services and no one claims that the quality of those services will be harmful to those victims, or even simply inadequate, then on what basis can it be legitimate to deny the victims access to out - of - state lawyers on a fee - paying basis in a more competitive marketplace than one that is limited to Texas lawyers only?

You will only be required to pay your attorney for his / her legal services if your case has a successful outcome.

People assume that if they're not paying for legal services, they will not be adequately represented or that our lawyers must not know what they are doing.

If you want to do public interest work this summer but haven't been able to figure out how to pay for it, look no further: The Public Interest Law Initiative (PILI)'s Law Student Internship Program is open to all 1L and 2L law students from across the country who are interested in working with legal service agencies in Illinois over the summer.

And if you think about all the other needs people have, saving for retirement or putting a kid through school or making a car note or paying off loans, if you have to choose between doing one of those things and paying for legal services, you are going to go without the legal services.

If you never receive compensation from your claim, you never have to pay us anything for the legal services that we provide.

The idea is that you can bring your Fosamax injury claim to the attention of our attorneys without worrying about how much our legal support will end up costing you because you will only have to pay us for our services if we are successful with your claim and you receive compensation as a result.

The only caveat to this avenue is that you may need to be able to pay for your lawyer's services as not all lawyers accept legal aid (if you can't, don't worry; we'll cover that soon).

If I obtain a new lawyer who will pay for the legal services rendered by the old attorney?

If you are like thousands of other attorneys, you will never know, unless you decide to move to a new service provider — at which point, your legal marketing company may inform you that you have no rights to the content that you paid for.

If you are unsatisfied with your lawyer's level of service or you have a personality conflict with him / her, you can certainly shop around for another lawyer without paying more legal fees.

The model for the form drafting service is simple: attorneys pay a licensing fee to use the document automation platform, and individual users get to benefit from a low flat fee service (starting at $ 15) that helps them fill out their legal documents, and potentially even file those documents where efiling is available (and at an additional cost if one is associated with the filing).

If you are paying a lawyer for legal services, you can discuss ways to pay your bill.

; (4) taxpayers would not have to pay for a justice system that provides lawyers a good place to earn a living but doesn't provide affordable legal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rlegal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&rLegal Bill - To High?»

What if all lawyers considered it their professional duty and obligation to provide legal services to those unable to afford to pay for those services?

Lawyers don't offer services if people won't pay for them and... lots of legal issues can't be addressed at a cost of hundreds of dollars per hour.

The practical answer is that lawyers don't offer services if people won't pay for them and that lots of legal issues can't be addressed at a cost of hundreds of dollars per hour.

If on the other hand one views the 2008/2009 crisis as a once - in - a-generation event that has caused a significant economic reset — that the balance of power in legal services has shifted in favour of corporate counsel and the «more for less» mantra is more than just a passing fad, outside counsel should pay very close attention to the lesson learned here.

Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.

If the FCC is able to change the rules, service providers in the US will now have the legal sanction to throttle a Netflix and force you to pay more for accessing this data - intense service.

All of the cost of the legal services will be paid for by the agency even if you change your mind about adoption.

But wait — if you are like most people and pay for your legal services based upon an hourly rate because that is the way things have been done in the past, then this system could encourage and actually reward an inefficient lawyer.