Sentences with phrase «pay high commission»

Arthur Darmanin: We have three main points of distinction: We pay high commission to our agents; we provide breakthrough technology; and we offer revenue sharing.

Discount brokers were disadvantaged, it said, because they were effectively cut off from the MLS, and consumers wanting to list but handle the rest of the process themselves were forced to pay high commissions.

The rule is intended to discourage brokers and other financial professionals from putting retirement - plan assets into products that pay high commissions or profit - sharing compensation to the brokers — a practice that's currently legal as long as the investments can be portrayed as «suitable» for the customer.

Brokers are often paid high commissions to sell TICs.

They're allowed to give you self - interested advice — for example, by selling you the class of mutual - fund shares that pays the highest commissions instead of lower - cost shares in the same fund.

They are pulled off the streets and are paid high commissions for milking money out of people.

Unfortunately, those are the mutual funds which most financial advisers (financial product pushers) will recommend to the public, the reason is that those are the products which will pay the highest commission.

Our elite tiers pay higher commissions than anyone in the industry.

Readers benefit from far lower prices and publishers get paid higher commissions (70 % at $ 2.99 and up).

They believe the practice can spur advisers to recommend products that pay higher commissions, rather than products that are best for the investor.

For example, a lender would pay a higher commission on a 10 - year mortgage than a 5 - year because it is more profitable for them, and because it means the broker would be selling one mortgage in a decade, instead of two, five - year mortgages.

Brokers were paid higher commissions to sell subprime mortgages than prime mortgages.

Mortgage brokers should have NEVER been paid higher commissions to sell one type of mortgage over another.

The broker should be there to help the client get the best mortgage for their needs... not to sell the mortgage that pays the highest commissions.

Advisers that use soft dollars agree to pay higher commissions to broker - dealers to execute its trades in exchange for things like Bloomberg terminals and research databases, things that the adviser could choose to pay out of its own pocket, but rarely does.

The Fund has no sales load (a charge for purchasing the fund), no soft - dollar arrangements (where fund managers receive research, data terminals and other benefits in return for paying higher commissions to brokers), no trailing fees (where funds pay brokerages an ongoing percentage of assets in order to bring business to the fund), and no 12b - 1 marketing fees (where shareholders pay an amount over and above management and operating expenses, so that funds can advertise and attract new shareholders).

To the extent Adviser obtains brokerage and research services from a broker - dealer that it otherwise would acquire at its own expense, Adviser may have an incentive pay higher commissions than would otherwise be the case.

If you are starting out as an investor, you don't want to be stuck paying high commission fees.

Private collectors almost always said this because they were paid a higher commission if they set up rehabilitation plans where borrowers paid certain minimum amounts.

You can either lease, buy, or pay higher commissions for use of the platform.

Naturally with this business model, the IB will go for the broker which pays the highest commission.

This part could be true, IF the fund family paying higher commission is American Funds, which has lower expense ratio than other typical broker - sold funds.

Then there is the illiquidity — that is what allows the sponsors the ability to pay high commissions to those who sell the annuities and non-traded REITs.

Why get index fund results when you can just buy true no - load Vanguard index funds, that don't randomly stray from their asset classes, and just say no to paying high commissions and 12b - 1 fees?

The investment adviser may cause the fund to pay a higher commission than otherwise obtainable from other brokers or dealers in return for brokerage or research services or products if the investment adviser believes that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided.

The investment adviser may cause a fund to pay a higher commission than otherwise obtainable from other brokers or dealers in return for brokerage or research services or products if the investment adviser believes that such commission is reasonable in relation to the services provided.

Then, as he started making many placements, he started demanding that he be paid higher commissions.

Life insurers do sometimes pay higher commission percentages for permanent policies, increasing the allure to agents.

Commercial insurance may pay a higher commission since they have complex underwriting requirements and time consuming to find the right company.

Whole life insurance pays higher commissions to the broker, and may also include fees for the management of the investments.

They often pay high commissions to the people who sell them, providing them a strong incentive to convince you it is the right investment for you.

They don't pay the highest commissions... and their underwriting is very tight / restrictive.

Who wouldn't want to go on a Mediterranean cruise and get paid high commissions for writing business with them?

Don't pay high commissions One of the reasons for higher life insurance premiums is that most life insurance policies pay commissions to the agent or broker.

Your financial professional (life insurance agent) gets paid higher commissions when they sell their own company's products than by selling products from other companies.

A financial advisor is interested in selling you the most expensive policy that he or she can, because they get paid the highest commissions.

Not true - car dealers usually pitch those insurers with whom they have tie - ups or those who pay them higher commissions.

Agents who steer business to a particular company because they pay a higher commission.

A recruiter's compensation is based on maximizing their commission per unit of effort, so they're incentivized to recommend companies that: 1) pay higher commissions, 2) make hiring decisions quickly, 3) are more likely to give you an offer (even if the position isn't what you really want), and 4) are more likely to have you accept the offer (maybe because the the job is a good fit, but maybe because it's a bad fit but pays very well or because the company is good at hyping up its job openings).

Number two: Even when dealing with a so - called «at - arms - length» insurance broker representative who ostensibly will choose the best policy for the best price applicable to the insured's particular needs from amongst all of the insurance companies that that brokerage deals with, the sad fact remains that some said broker reps will recommend / sell the package of a certain insurance company that pays the highest commission for said product / sale.

My response to the original post was within general context of overall public sentiment and even acknowledged that there is a market that doesn't mind paying high commission — however the younger market ie.

Even something like how to persuade FSBO's to pay higher commissions and implementation of such strategy would trigger more interest in the article.

You have no way to figure out if in fact he has put you with the right company for you, or the one that will pay him the highest commission.

AD: We pay high commissions because to get good, productive agents, you have to pay them well.

We believe in paying high commissions, but at the same time, having a business model that makes sense for the franchisee.

Perhaps Stan and other «big name» Realtors should focus more on streamlining their business models and less on bamboozling Sellers into paying higher commission on the faulty belief that paying «more» will get them a better level of service.

Our associates are not paying the high commission splits that many competitors collect, allowing them to increase their retained earnings.

What a novel idea pay a higher commission and my house will sell faster!

If so, why would you want to pay the high commissions and reduce your net proceeds?

They recently agreed to pay over $ 13 million to resolve the CFPB's charges that they paid higher commissions for higher rate loans, in spite of written compensation agreements that did not mention that practice.